Extreme Thermophiles

Abstract

Extreme thermophiles are microorganisms adapted to temperatures normally found only in hot springs, hydrothermal vents and similar sites of geothermal activity. These microorganisms include diverse archaea and bacteria and represent a wide range of metabolic strategies. The geothermal environments populated by extreme thermophiles provide chemical resources for microbial metabolism. Various molecular features enable the cells of extreme thermophiles to function optimally at these temperatures, which kill other cells. These features include low‐molecular weight compounds that stabilise the conformations of proteins and nucleic acids, enzymes with intrinsically stable folded conformations and unusual lipids that form highly impermeable membranes. Metabolic activities and intrinsically stable enzymes of extreme thermophiles offer advantages for industrial and diagnostic processes ranging from ore processing to molecular genotyping.

Key Concepts

  • Bacteria and archaea consist of very simple (prokaryotic) cells but they vary greatly with respect to metabolic capabilities, physiological limits and other fundamental properties.
  • The term ‘extreme thermophile’ usually denotes a microorganism which requires the temperatures found in geothermal environments for its optimal growth.
  • Geothermal environments provide inorganic nutrients and sources of chemical energy that certain bacteria and archaea can utilise.
  • Extreme thermophiles use two general strategies to avoid thermal denaturation of their enzymes: extrinsic stabilisation, conferred by certain small molecules, and intrinsic stabilisation, conferred by the specific structure and conformation of the enzyme itself.
  • The intrinsically thermostable enzymes of extreme thermophiles are useful for biotechnology because they allow chemical reactions to be catalysed with high specificity at high temperatures or under other harsh conditions.

Keywords: optimal growth temperature (Topt); molecular phylogeny; microbial biogeography; enzyme denaturation; extrinsic stabilisation; intrinsic stabilisation; DNA damage; proton‐motive force (PMF); bioleaching; polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

Figure 1. The three cardinal temperatures of microbial growth.
Figure 2. A universal molecular phylogeny. The tree depicts the relatedness of small‐subunit ribosomal RNAs among all cellular organisms (Woese et al., ). The total branch length between two organisms (end points) reflects the number of differences between the two nucleotide sequences. The heavy lines mark the lineages of extreme thermophiles and hyperthermophiles. The irregular box (blue) indicates the molecular divergence of multicellular organisms (plants, animals and fungi).
Figure 3. The cellular structure of some extreme thermophiles: (a) Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus. The cell is approximately 1 μm long, and layers corresponding to cytoplasmic membrane and cell wall are visible around the periphery (ultrathin section, electron micrograph). Wiegel and Ljungdahl . Reproduced with permission of Springer Nature. (b) Dictyoglomus thermophilium strain Rt8N2 (Patel et al., ; light microscopy, phase contrast). At this stage of growth, very long rod‐shaped cells are arranged around the periphery of a spherical membrane or envelope of approximately 20 μm in diameter. Courtesy of Morgan and Wiegel. (c) Thermotoga maritima (electron micrograph, ultrathin section). The cell body is approximately 1 μm long, densely stained and bounded by a cytoplasmic membrane and cell wall. The ‘toga’ is an outer membrane that surrounds the cell, leaving large spaces at the ends. Courtesy of Drs Reinhard Rachel and Karl O. Stetter. (d) Thermosipho species (electron micrograph, platinum shadowing). Several cells (marked by arrows) are enclosed in one long sheath, or toga, which becomes visible between the cells (intercellular regions of ‘empty’ toga marked by arrowheads). The total length of sheathed cells shown is approximately 20 μm. Courtesy of Drs Reinhard Rachel and Karl O. Stetter. (e) Sulfolobus acidocaldarius (electron micrograph, ultrathin section). Two irregular cells are shown in contact, each with an envelope that creates a characteristic ‘picket fence’ pattern in the cross‐section. This represents an S‐layer canopy (outer stained layer) held approximately 20 nm away from the cytoplasmic membrane by thin supports (visible in certain regions of the cell margin). The width of the panel corresponds to approximately 1 μm.
close

References

Albers SV, van de Vossenberg JL, Driessen AJ and Konings WN (2000) Adaptations of the archaeal cell membrane to heat stress. Frontiers in Bioscience 5: D813–D820.

Amend JP and Shock EL (2001) Energetics of overall metabolic reactions of thermophilic and hyperthermophilic archaea and bacteria. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 25: 175–243.

Atalah J, Cáceres‐Moreno P, Espina G and Blamey JM (2019) Thermophiles and the applications of their enzymes as new biocatalysts. Bioresource Technology 280: 478–488.

Atomi H, Matsumi R and Imanaka T (2004) Reverse gyrase is not a prerequisite for hyperthermophilic life. Journal of Bacteriology 186: 4829–4833.

Bize A, Karlsson EA, Ekefjard K, et al. (2009) A unique virus release mechanism in the Archaea. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 106: 11306–11311.

Chen Z and Wan C (2017) Non‐sterile fermentations for the economical biochemical conversion of renewable feedstocks. Biotechnology Letters 39: 1765–1777.

Forterre P (2002) A hot story from comparative genomics: reverse gyrase is the only hyperthermophile‐specific protein. Trends in Genetics 18: 236–237.

Grogan DW (1998) Hyperthermophiles and the problem of DNA instability. Molecular Microbiology 28: 1043–1049.

Grogan DW (2004) Stability and repair of DNA in hyperthermophilic archaea. Current Issues in Molecular Biology 6: 137–144.

Grogan DW, Carver GT and Drake JW (2001) Genetic fidelity under harsh conditions: analysis of spontaneous mutation in the thermoacidophilic archaeon Sulfolobus acidocaldarius. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 98: 7928–7933.

Grogan DW (2016) Proteins of DNA replication from extreme thermophiles: PCR and beyond. In: Rampelotto PH (ed.) Biotechnology of Extremophiles: Advances and Challenges., pp 525–538. Springer International Publishing.

Guiral M, Prunetti L, Aussignargues C, et al. (2012) The hyperthermophilic bacterium Aquifex aeolicus: from respiratory pathways to extremely resistant enzymes and biotechnological applications. Advances in Microbial Physiology 61: 125–194.

Han H, Ling Z, Khan A, et al. (2019) Improvements of thermophilic enzymes: from genetic modifications to applications. Bioresource Technology 279: 350–361.

Hildebrand F, Meyer A and Eyre‐Walker A (2010) Evidence of selection upon genomic GC‐content in bacteria. PLoS Genetics 6: e1001107.

Huber H and Prangishvili D (2006) Sulfolobales. In: Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer K‐H and Stackebrandt E (eds) The Prokaryotes: a Handbook on the Biology of Bacteria, 3rd edn, pp 28–51. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC: New York, NY.

Jaenicke R (1991) Protein stability and molecular adaptation to extreme conditions. European Journal of Biochemistry 202: 715–728.

Kletzin A (1989) Coupled enzymatic production of sulfite, thiosulfate, and hydrogen sulfide from sulfur: purification and properties of a sulfur oxygenase reductase from the facultatively anaerobic archaebacterium Desulfurolobus ambivalens. Journal of Bacteriology 171: 1638–1643.

Mao D and Grogan D (2012) Genomic evidence of rapid, global‐scale gene flow in a Sulfolobus species. ISME Journal 6: 1613–1616.

Olson GJ, Brierley JA and Brierley CL (2003) Bioleaching review part B: progress in bioleaching: applications of microbial processes by the minerals industries. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 63: 249–257.

Olson DG, Sparling R and Lynd LR (2015) Ethanol production by engineered thermophiles. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 33: 130–141.

Oshima T, Moriya T and Terui Y (2011) Identification, chemical synthesis, and biological functions of unusual polyamines produced by extreme thermophiles. Methods in Molecular Biology 720: 81–111.

Patel BK, Morgan HW, Wiegel J and Daniel RM (1987) Isolation of an extremely thermophilic chemoorganotrophic anaerobe similar to Dictyoglomus thermophilium from New Zealand hot springs. Archives of Microbiology 147: 21–24.

Pina M, Bize A, Forterre P and Prangishvili D (2011) The archeoviruses. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 35: 1035–1054.

Santos H and da Costa MS (2002) Compatible solutes of organisms that live in hot saline environments. Environmental Microbiology 4: 501–509.

Selmer M, Dunham CM, Murphy FV 4th, et al. (2006) Structure of the 70S ribosome complexed with mRNA and tRNA. Science 313: 1935–1942.

Sharp R and Williams R (1995) Thermus Species. Plenum Press: New York.

Sleytr UB, Egelseer EM, Ilk N, Pum D and Schuster B (2007) S‐Layers as a basic building block in a molecular construction kit. FEBS Journal 274: 323–334.

Urbieta MS, Donati ER, Chan KG, et al. (2015) Thermophiles in the genomic era: biodiversity, science and applications. Biotechnology Advances 33: 633–647.

Visone V, Vettone A, Serpe M, et al. (2014) Chromatin structure and dynamics in hot environments: architectural proteins and DNA topoisomerases of thermophilic archaea. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 15: 17162–17187.

Whitaker RJ, Grogan DW and Taylor JW (2003) Geographic barriers isolate endemic populations of hyperthermophilic archaea. Science 301: 976–978.

Wiedmann M, Wilson WJ, Czajka J, et al. (1994) Ligase chain reaction (LCR) – overview and applications. PCR Methods and Applications 3: S51–S64.

Wiegel J and Ljungdahl LG (1981) Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus gen. nov. spec. nov., a new, extreme thermophilic, anaerobic bacterium. Archives of Microbiology 128: 343–348.

Wildhaber I, Santarius U and Baumeister W (1987) Three‐dimensional structure of the surface protein of Desulfurococcus mobilis. Journal of Bacteriology 169: 5563–5568.

Woese CR, Kandler O and Wheelis ML (1990) Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 87: 4576–4579.

Yu MX, Slater MR and Ackermann HW (2006) Isolation and characterization of Thermus bacteriophages. Archives of Virology 151: 663–679.

Further Reading

Cavicchioli R (ed.) (2007) Archaea: Cellular and Molecular Biology. ASM Press: Washington, DC.

Robb FT, Antranikian G, Grogan D and Driessen A (eds) (2008) Thermophiles: Biology and Technology at High Temperatures. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis: Boca Raton, USA.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Grogan, Dennis W(Mar 2020) Extreme Thermophiles. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0000392.pub3]