Phototaxis: Microbial

Abstract

Phototaxis in its broadest sense is light‐regulated movement of motile organisms (microorganisms in the case of microbial phototaxis), usually resulting in their attraction to (positive phototaxis) or avoidance of (negative phototaxis) illuminated regions. Prokaryotes often use a time‐biased random walk strategy under which they choose directions randomly, but move for longer time periods in the chosen direction when that direction happens to be correct. They use type I sensory rhodopsin photoreceptors and two‐component histidine kinase‐mediated phosphotransfer systems to regulate flagellar movement. Eukaryotic microbes by contrast can sense and respond to the direction of light by regulating the direction of movement. Phototransduction pathways in eukaryotic microbes appear to involve protein phosphorylation/dephosphorylation at serine or threonine residues, and the responsible kinases and phosphatases are regulated by second messengers. This review focuses on select representative organisms from each of the three taxonomic domains whose photosensory signal transduction pathways have been studied. Although many components of the signal transduction pathways controlling phototaxis have been identified, there is still much to be elucidated.

Key Concepts:

  • Phototaxis enables microorganisms to position themselves in an environment that is optimal for survival.

  • Organisms from all three taxonomic domains display phototaxis with differing photosensory signal transduction pathways.

  • Photosensory signal transduction pathways in eubacteria and archaea involve the coupling of signals from photoreceptors to the same signalling pathways as are used by these organisms for chemotaxis.

  • Phototransduction pathways in eukaryotic microbes appear to involve protein phosphorylation/dephosphorylation at serine or threonine residues, and the responsible kinases and phosphatases are regulated by second messengers.

Keywords: phototaxis; photomovement; photophobic response; photokinesis; photosensory transduction

Figure 1.

A model for photosensory and chemosensory signalling pathways in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Photoactive yellow protein (PYP) elicits repellent responses via an as yet unknown pathway (indicated by the question mark) that probably involves a CheA‐like histidine kinase and a CheY‐like reponse regulator. Attractant responses to light are elicited by increases in the rate of photosynthetic electron transport (blue arrows), which is coupled to proton pumping (brown arrow) across the photosynthetic membranes. The rate of electron transport may be sensed via the FAD prosthetic group of an Aer‐related methyl‐accepting chemotaxis protein (MCPAer), which in turn passes attractant signals to CheWII, CheAII and thence to a CheY‐related protein. Chemotactic attractant signals are passed via multiple CheW, ‐A and ‐Y proteins to converge with the signalling pathways for phototaxis. Genes involved in chemosensory and photosensory signal transduction are found in multiple loci, as shown in the inset. All are transcribed from left to right and some are transcribed as parts of large polycistronic transcripts from the operons shown. Red arrows indicate repellent signals, and green arrows indicate attractant signals. Attractant signals inhibit, whereas repellent signals enhance, the rate of phosphorylation of CheY. Interaction of the phosphorylated form of CheY with the flagellar motor switch causes the motor in Rba. sphaeroides to cease rotation.

Figure 2.

A model for photosensory signalling pathways in Halobacterium salinarum. Interconversions between the different forms of the two photoreceptors SRI and SRII are indicated by black arrows, and the yellow hv labels indicate which steps are light‐driven. SRI can exist in both attractant (S373) and repellent (Sb510) signalling states and S373 is converted back to SRI587, either via Sb510 in a fast light‐dependent pathway or via a slower light‐independent route. The signalling state(s) of SRII pass repellent signals to the flagellar motors. Attractant signals (green arrows) inhibit, and repellent signals (red arrows) enhance, the rate of phosphorylation of CheY. Interaction of the phosphorylated form of CheY with the flagellar motor switch causes reversal of the direction of motor rotation.

Figure 3.

A model for Dictyostelium slug photosensory and thermosensory signalling pathways. The top panel shows a pseudocolour image of two slugs migrating on a water agar surface towards a light source to the right of the figure. Each slug is about a millimetre in length and migrates across the agar surface at about 1 mm h−1. The lower panel shows a lateral view of a migrating slug. The ‘thought bubbles’ emanating from the tip indicate that the tip controls slug behaviour via the indicated pathways. Signals from photoreceptor and thermoreceptor converge early and thence control the concentrations of the intracellular second messengers cAMP, cGMP, Ca2+ and possibly IP3. The evidence for inositol polyphosphate (IP3) involvement is the pharmacological effect of Li+, whose target could also (or instead) be glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3). Heterotrimeric (Gα1βγ, Gα4βγ, Gα7βγ and Gα8βγ) and small (RasD) GTP‐binding proteins and their regulators (MEGAP1 or WAVE‐associated RacGAP Protein (WRP), RasGEFE and RasGEFL) are involved in transducing the signals to regulate components of the actomyosin cytoskeleton. At least some of the signalling proteins (RasD, Erk2, PKB and GRP125) are recruited by the actin‐binding scaffolding protein filamin into a photosensory signalling complex. This modulates the tip activation and inhibition signals that determine the position of the slug tip. Transient lateral imbalances between tip activation and inhibition thus induced by light and temperature gradients cause temporary lateral shifts in tip position and thence slug turning, because the slug ‘follows its nose’. Depending upon whether tip activation or inhibition dominates the response, the slug turns either towards or away from the light source, or up or down the temperature gradient. Sign reversals in slug turning responses result from switches in the balance between control by tip activation and inhibition. This explains direction‐dependent sign reversals in phototaxis that cause bidirectional phototaxis and temperature‐dependent sign reversals in thermotaxis that cause movement towards the warmth or the cold depending on the temperature. Tip activation signals are believed to be carried by three‐dimensional spiral scroll waves of extracellular cAMP (shown in cyan in the lower panel, with the direction of propagation in red) analogous to the two‐dimensional cAMP waves that mediate aggregation. At the rear boundary of the tip region, the wave twists and breaks into a train of planar waves that propagate backwards through the rear of the slug. Candidate tip inhibitors are slug turning factor (STF), ammonia and adenosine. Some of the elements used in this figure were kindly provided by Dr Siegert F, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.

close

References

Anders K, von Stetten D, Mailliet J et al. (2011) Spectroscopic and photochemical characterization of the red‐light sensitive photosensory module of Cph2 from Synechocystis PCC 6803. Photochemistry and Photobiology 87: 160–173.

Annesley SJ, Bandala‐Sanchez E, Ahmed AU and Fisher PR (2007) Filamin repeat segments required for photosensory signalling in Dictyostelium discoideum. BMC Cell Biology 8: 48.

Armitage JP (1997) Behavioural responses of bacteria to light and oxygen. Archives of Microbiology 168: 249–261.

Bandala‐Sanchez E, Annesley SJ and Fisher PR (2006) A phototaxis signalling complex in Dictyostelium discoideum. European Journal of Cell Biology 85: 1099–1106.

Berleman JE and Bauer CE (2005) A che‐like signal transduction cascade involved in controlling flagella biosynthesis in Rhodospirillum centenum. Molecular Microbiology 55: 1390–1402.

Bhaya D, Takahashi A and Grossman AR (2001) Light regulation of type IV pilus‐dependent motility by chemosensor‐like elements in Synechocystis PCC6803. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 98: 7540–7545.

Bösger J, Wagner V, Weisheit W and Mittag M (2009) Analysis of flagellar phosphoproteins from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Eukaryotic Cell 8: 922–932.

Crielaard W, Kort R and Hellingwerf KJ (2001) Photoactive yellow protein, a photoreceptor from purple bacteria. In: Häder DP and Lebert M (eds) Photomovement, pp. 179–192. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Fabczak H, Sobierajska K and Fabczak S (2008) A rhodopsin immunoanalog in the related photosensitive protozoans Blepharisma japonicum and Stentor coeruleus. Photochemical and Photobiological Sciences 7: 1041–1045.

Fiedler B, Börner T and Wilde A (2005) Phototaxis in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803: role of different photoreceptors. Photochemistry and Photobiology 81: 1481–1488.

Fisher PR (2001) Genetic analysis of phototaxis in Dictyostelium. In: Häder DP and Lebert M (eds) Photomovement, pp. 519–559. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Francione LM, Annesley SJ, Carilla‐Latorre S, Escalante R and Fisher PR (2011) The Dictyostelium model for mitochondrial disease. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology 22: 120–130.

Fuhrmann M, Stahlberg A, Govorunova E, Rank S and Hegemann P (2001) The abundant retinal protein of the Chlamydomonas eye is not the photoreceptor for phototaxis and photophobic responses. Journal of Cell Science 114: 3857–3863.

Gloss A, Rivero F, Khaire N et al. (2003) Villidin, a novel WD‐repeat and villin‐related protein from Dictyostelium, is associated with membranes and the cytoskeleton. Molecular Biology of the Cell 14: 2716–2727.

Heath RJW and Insall RH (2008) Dictyostelium MEGAPs: F‐BAR domain proteins that regulate motility and membrane tubulation in contractile vacuoles. Journal of Cell Science 121: 1054–1064.

Ikeuchi M and Ishizuka T (2008) Cyanobacteriochromes: a new superfamily of tetrapyrrole‐binding photoreceptors in cyanobacteria. Photochemical and Photobiological Sciences 7: 1159–1167.

Imamoto Y and Kataoka M (2007) Structure and photoreaction of photoactive yellow protein, a structural prototype of the PAS domain superfamily. Photochemistry and Photobiology 83: 40–49.

Jékely G (2009) Evolution of phototaxis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 364: 2795–2808.

Josef K, Saranak J and Foster KW (2005) Ciliary behavior of a negatively phototactic Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton 61: 97–111.

Kreutel S, Kuhn A and Kiefer D (2010) The photosensor protein Ppr of Rhodocista centenaria is linked to the chemotaxis signalling pathway. BMC Microbiology 10: 281.

Kuhlmann H‐W (1998) Photomovements in ciliated protozoa. Naturwissenschaften 85: 143–154.

Marwan W (2001) Photomovement and photomorphogenesis in Physarum polycephalum: targeting of cytoskeleton and gene expression by light. In: Häder DP and Lebert M (eds) Photomovement, pp. 561–587. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Mitchell DR (2000) Chlamydomonas flagella. Journal of Phycology 36: 261–273.

Moon Y‐J, Kim SY, Jung K‐H et al. (2011) Cyanobacterial phytochrome Cph2 is a negative regulator in phototaxis toward UV‐A. FEBS Letters 585: 335–340.

Moon Y‐J, Lee E‐M, Park YM et al. (2010) The role of cyanopterin in UV/blue light signal transduction of cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 phototaxis. Plant Cell Physiology 51: 969–980.

Noegel AA, Blau‐Wasser R, Sultana H et al. (2004) The cyclase‐associated protein CAP as regulator of cell polarity and cAMP signaling in Dictyostelium. Molecular Biology of the Cell 15: 934–939.

Pellequer J‐L, Wager‐Smith KA, Kay SA and Getzoff ED (1998) Photoactive yellow protein: a structural prototype for the three‐dimensional fold of the PAS domain superfamily. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 95: 5884–5890.

Ritter E, Stehfest K, Berndt A, Hegemann P and Bartl FJ (2008) Monitoring light‐induced structural changes of channelrhodopsin‐2 by UV‐visible and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Biological Chemistry 283: 35033–35041.

Sasaki J, Tsai AI and Spudich JL (2011) Opposite displacement of helix F in attractant and repellent signaling by sensory Rhodopsin–Htr complexes. Journal of Biological Chemistry 286: 18868–18877.

Schlesner M, Miller A, Streif S et al. (2009) Identification of archaea‐specific chemotaxis proteins which interact with the flagellar apparatus. BMC Microbiology 9: 56.

Sineshchekov OA, Sasaki J, Phillips BJ and Spudich JL (2008) A Schiff base connectivity switch in sensory rhodopsin signaling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 105: 16159–16164.

Sineshchekov OA, Sasaki J, Wang J and Spudich JL (2010) Attractant and repellent signaling conformers of sensory rhodopsin–transducer complexes. Biochemistry 49: 6696–6704.

Sobierajska K, Fabczak H and Fabczak S (2007) Phosducin interacts with the G‐protein βγ‐dimer of ciliate protozoan Blepharisma japonicum upon illumination. Journal of Experimental Biology 210: 4213–4223.

Song J‐Y, Cho HS, Cho J‐I et al. (2011) Near‐UV cyanobacteriochrome signaling system elicits negative phototaxis in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 108: 10780–10785.

Spudich JL (1999) Variations on a molecular switch: transport and sensory signalling by archaeal rhodopsins. Molecular Microbiology 28: 1051–1058.

Streif S, Staudinger WF, Marwan W and Oesterhelt D (2008) Flagellar rotation in the archaeon Halobacterium salinarum depends on ATP. Journal of Molecular Biology 384: 1–8.

Sudo Y and Spudich JL (2006) Three strategically placed hydrogen‐bonding residues convert a proton pump into a sensory receptor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 103: 16129–16134.

Sugden C, Ross S, Annesley SJ et al. (2011) A Dictyostelium SH2 domain adaptor protein required for correct DIF‐1 signaling and pattern formation. Developmental Biology 353: 290–301.

Suzuki D, Furutani Y, Inoue K et al. (2009) Effects of chloride ion binding on the photochemical properties of Salinibacter sensory rhodopsin I. Journal of Molecular Biology 392: 48–62.

Taylor BL, Zhulin IB and Johnson MS (1999) Aerotaxis and other energy‐sensing behavior in bacteria. Annual Review of Microbiology 53: 103–128.

Wagner V, Ullmann K, Mollwo A et al. (2008) The phosphoproteome of a Chlamydomonas reinhardtii eyespot fraction includes key proteins of the light signaling pathway. Plant Physiology 146: 772–788.

Wilkins A, Szafranski K, Fraser DJ et al. (2005) The Dictyostelium genome encodes numerous RasGEFs with multiple biological roles. Genome Biology 6: R68.

Yagasaki J, Suzuki D, Ihara K et al. (2010) Spectroscopic studies of a sensory rhodopsin I homologue from the archaeon Haloarcula vallismortis. Biochemistry 49: 1183–1190.

Yoshihara S, Shimada T, Matsuoka D et al. (2006) Reconstitution of blue‐green reversible photoconversion of a cyanobacterial photoreceptor, PixJ1, in phycocyanobilin‐producing E. coli. Biochemistry 45: 3775–3784.

Further Reading

Fabczak H (2000) Protozoa as model system for studies of sensory light transduction: photophobic response in the ciliate Stentor and Blepharisma. Acta Protozoologica 39: 171–181.

Fisher PR (1997) Directional movement of migrating slugs. In: Maeda Y, Inouye K and Takeuchi I (eds) Dictyostelium A Model System for Cell and Developmental Biology, pp. 437–452. Tokyo: Universal Academy Press.

Gualteri P (2001) Morphology of photoreceptor systems in microalgae. Micron 32: 411–426.

Häder D‐P and Lebert M (eds) (2001) Photomovement. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Hoff WD, Jung KH and Spudich JL (1997) Molecular mechanism of photosignalling by archaeal sensory rhodopsins. Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure 26: 223–258.

Möglich A and Yang X (2010) Structure and function of plant photoreceptors. Annual Review of Plant Biology 61: 21–47.

Montgomery BL (2007) Sensing the light: photoreceptive systems and signal transduction in cyanobacteria. Molecular Microbiology 64: 16–27.

Sasaki J and Spudich JL (2008) Signal transfer in haloarchaeal sensory rhodopsin–transducer complexes. Photochemistry and Photobiology 84: 863–868.

Sineshchekov OA and Govorunova EG (1999) Rhodopsin‐mediated photosensing in green flagellated algae. Trends in Plant Science 4: 58–63.

Spudich JL, Yang C‐S, Jung K‐H and Spudich EN (2000) Retinylidene proteins: structures and functions from archaea to humans. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 16: 365–392.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Allan, Claire Y, and Fisher, Paul R(Oct 2011) Phototaxis: Microbial. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0000399.pub2]