Transfer RNA Recognition by Synthetases

Fidelity of transfer ribonucleic acid (tRNA) charging by amino acids ensures correct translation of the genetic code into proteins. Charging is catalysed by a set of enzymes known as aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Owing to the degeneracy of the genetic code, some of the different tRNAs have the same amino acid attached to them. Specificity of the charging reaction is ensured by positive elements, the identity determinants unique to each tRNA and responsible for its recognition by the cognate synthetase, and negative elements, the antideterminants that prevent false recognitions. To fulfil the aminoacylation specificity and prevent noncognate aminoacyl-tRNA delivery to the ribosome, some synthetases also mediate proofreading reactions that increase fidelity of the tRNA charging. In such reactions, misactivated amino acids or mischarged tRNAs are checked in specific sites and noncognate products are hydrolysed.

Keywords: aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase; genetic code; protein synthesis; RNA recognition; tRNA

Figure 1. Cloverleaf folding of transfer RNA (tRNA) with location of known identity nucleotides. The standard cloverleaf structure and conventional numbering system are used. Constant nucleotides are explicitly indicated (T and are modified residues: ribothymidine and pseudouridine). The · symbol indicates Watson–Crick base pairings, including G·U pairs; thin black lines indicate other base pairings. The inset represents the L-shaped structure of tRNA and highlights its different domains. To designate identity positions for a given amino acid, the single-letter code for amino acids is used. The figure emphasizes the clustering of the strongest identity elements in three domains of the tRNA molecule: the two distal extremities and the core region. Notice that not all of the nucleotides at these positions are used for a given identity (e.g. only G3·U70 for alanine identity; only U35 and A73 for tyrosine identity). The figure makes a distinction between identities of tRNAs recognized by class I and class II synthetases. aVariable region (e.g. long extra arm of tRNASer, nucleotides 44–48 for tRNAPhe); bLevitt pair 15–48 of tRNACys; cvariable pocket (nucleotide 20 for tRNAAla, tRNAArg, tRNALeu and tRNAPhe). Characterized individual modified nucleosides that act as identity determinants in tRNA anticodon loops are shown in the inset (k2C, lysidine; s2U, 2-thiouridine; mnm5s2U, 5-methylaminomethyl-2-thiouridine; Q, queuosine; I, inosine; , pseudouridine; m1G, 1-methylguanosine; t6A, N-6-threonylcarbamoyladenosine and yW, wybutosine).
Figure 2. Conformations of the ATP molecules interacting with class I and class II synthetases. The ATP conformations are those found in the GlnRS–tRNAGlnATP (left side) and AspRS–tRNAAspATP (right side) complexes. In class I aaRSs, the ATP molecule exhibits an extended conformation reminiscent of that found in other enzymes containing a Rossmann fold. In class II aaRSs, the ATP adopts a bent conformation with the -phosphate folded back over the adenine base. The figure displays the ATP molecule in two orientations with the adenine ring facing the reader (top) or rotated by 90° (bottom).
Figure 3. Different binding modes of the ATP and tRNA molecules observed in the class I GlnRS–tRNAGlnATP complex and the class II AspRS–tRNAAspATP complex. The upper part of the figure shows the ATP positions relative to the tRNA acceptor arms. The lower part of the figure shows the different binding approaches of the tRNA molecule.
close
 Further Reading
    Beuning PJ and Musier-Forsyth K (1999) Transfer RNA recognition by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Biopolymers 52: 1–28.
    Eriani G, Delarue M, Poch O, Gangloff J and Moras D (1990) Partition of tRNA synthetases into two classes based on mutually exclusive sets of sequence motifs. Nature 347: 203–206.
    Francklyn CS, First EA, Perona JJ and Hou YM (2008) Methods for kinetic and thermodynamic analysis of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Methods 44: 100–118.
    Giegé R (2008) Toward a more complete view of tRNA biology. Nature Structural and Molecular Biology 15: 1007–1014.
    Giegé R, Sissler M and Florentz C (1998) Universal rules and idiosyncratic features in tRNA identity. Nucleic Acids Research 26: 5017–5035.
    book Grosjean H (ed.) (2009) DNA and RNA Modification Enzymes: Comparative Structure, Mechanism, Functions, Cellular Interactions and Evolution. Austin, TX: Landes Bioscience.
    Ibba M and Söll D (2000) Aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis. Annual Review of Biochemistry 69: 617–650.
    McClain WH (1993) Rules that govern tRNA identity in protein synthesis. Journal of Molecular Biology 234: 257–280.
    Schimmel P, Giegé R, Moras D and Yokoyama S (1993) An operational RNA code for amino acids and possible relationship to genetic code. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 90: 8763–8768.
    Xie J and Schultz PG (2005) Adding amino acids to the genetic repertoire. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 9: 548–554.
Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Giegé, Richard, and Eriani, Gilbert(Sep 2009) Transfer RNA Recognition by Synthetases. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0000531.pub2]