Enzymes: Irreversible Inhibition


Many drugs that are in clinical use work by irreversibly inhibiting specific enzymes, either in the individual being treated or in an invading organism. Enzyme inhibitors are also of value for understanding the behaviour of individual enzymes and metabolic systems. Recovery from irreversible inhibition requires the synthesis of new enzyme. Although those irreversible inhibitors that react with specific groups in the enzyme protein generally inhibit more than one enzyme, those that initially form a noncovalent complex with the enzyme, with subsequent reaction within that complex leading to the formation of a covalent bond, can show a high degree of selectivity. Kinetic studies, which are detailed in this account, can be used to distinguish the different types of inhibition and the factors that contribute to effectiveness and selectivity.

Key Concepts:

  • Irreversible inhibition cannot be reversed by the removal of the excess inhibitor from the system.

  • Recovery from reversible inhibition depends on the removal of the inhibitor from the system, whereas recovery from irreversible inhibition requires the synthesis of fresh enzyme.

  • Enzyme turnover in the tissues is a balance between the rate of its synthesis and degradation.

  • Nonspecific irreversible inhibitors can react with several groups of the same type in different proteins.

  • Specific irreversible inhibitors form an initial noncovalent complex with the enzyme before the reaction within that complex to form a covalent bond.

  • Active‐site‐directed inhibitors contain a reactive grouping attached to a substrate analogue.

  • Mechanism‐based inhibitors can be highly specific because they depend on the activity of the enzyme to form a reactive intermediate that then reacts irreversibly with the enzyme.

  • Suicide substrates behave as both substrates and irreversible enzyme inhibitors in divergent processes.

  • Dosage schedule for effective therapy with irreversible inhibitors is dependant on the half‐life of enzyme turnover.

Keywords: enzyme modification; kinetics (of inhibition); Kcat inhibitors; mechanism‐based enzyme inhibitors; suicide inhibitors; suicide substrates

Figure 1.

First‐order inactivation of an enzyme. (a) Determination of the apparent first‐order rate constant (k′). (b) Dependence of k′ upon substrate concentration for a nonspecific irreversible inhibitor.

Figure 2.

Irreversible inhibition of an enzyme by a nonspecific irreversible inhibitor. The rate of activity loss is given by the rate constant kA and k1′ and k2 are the apparent rate constants for the modification of amino acid residues X and Y, which are both necessary for activity (kA=k1′+k2′). Residue Z cannot be involved since kZ′>kA, and no conclusion can be reached about residue W, which does not react.

Figure 3.

Variation of the apparent first‐order rate constant for a specific irreversible inhibitor with inhibitor concentration according to eqns and .

Figure 4.

Substrate transformation in the presence of a nonspecific irreversible inhibitor (eqn ). Determination of the pseudo‐first‐order rate constant (k′) and Ks according to eqn .

Figure 5.

Substrate transformation in the presence of a specific irreversible inhibitor (eqn ). Determination of the kinetic parameters according to (a) eqn and (b) eqn .

Figure 6.

Time course of substrate transformation in the presence of an irreversible inhibitor according to (a) eqn , also showing the loss of active enzyme, and (b) eqn .

Figure 7.

Product formation in the presence of an irreversible inhibitor. When inhibition is complete the reaction cannot be restarted with substrate, but will restart if additional enzyme is added.

Figure 8.

Kinetic analysis of reaction time courses in the presence of a specific irreversible inhibitor (eqn ). (a) Variation of the apparent first‐order rate constant with substrate concentration according to eqns and . (b) The dependence of the intercepts of the lines in (a) on the inhibitor concentration.

Figure 9.

Determination of the partition ratio (r) for the inactivation of an enzyme by a suicide‐substrate, according to eqn .

Figure 10.

Kinetic behaviour of a suicide‐substrate (eqn ). (a) Analysis of the time course for enzyme inactivation analysed according to eqn . (b) Analysis of the time course for inhibitor disappearance analysed according to eqn . The meaning of the parameters M, K′ and kin is given in Table .

Figure 11.

Recovery of enzyme activity in vivo after administration of a single dose of an irreversible inhibitor. The main curve is fitted to a simple first‐order equation. The inset shows the behaviour of the integrated form according to eqn .



Aldridge WN (1989) Cholinesterase and esterase inhibitors and reactivators of organophosphorus‐inhibited esterases. In: Sandler M and Smith HJ (eds) Design of Enzyme Inhibitors as Drugs, pp. 294–313. London: Oxford University Press.

Burke MA, Maini PK and Murray JD (1990) On the kinetics of suicide substrates. Biophysical Chemistry 37: 81–90.

Chang L, Chang C and Lin S (2000) Critical role of tyrosine 277 in the ligand‐binding and transactivating properties of retinoic acid receptor alpha. Biochemistry 39: 2183–2192.

Crestfield AM, Stein WH and Moore S (1963) Alkylation and identification of the histidine residues at the active site of ribonuclease. Journal of Biological Chemistry 238: 2413–2419.

Davison AN (1955) Return of cholinesterase activity in the rat after inhibition by organophosphorus compounds. 2. A comparative study of true and pseudo cholinesterase. Biochemical Journal 60: 339–346.

Dixon M, Webb EC, Thorne CJR and Tipton KF (1979) Enzymes, 3rd edn, pp. 361–381. New York: Academic Press.

Ensinger HA, Pauly HE, Pfleiderer G and Stiefel T (1978) The role of Zn(ii) in calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase studied by the influence of chelating agents and chemical modification of histidine residues. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 527: 432–441.

Forsberg A and Puu G (1984) Kinetics for the inhibition of acetylcholinesterase from the electric eel by some organophosphates and carbamates. European Journal of Biochemistry 140: 153–156.

Fowler CJ, Mantle TJ and Tipton KF (1982) The nature of the inhibition of rat liver monoamine oxidase types A and B by the acetylenic inhibitors clorgyline, l‐deprenyl and pargyline. Biochemical Pharmacology 31: 3555–3561.

Garciía‐Cánovas F, Tudela J, Varón R and Vázquez AM (1989) Experimental methods for kinetic study of suicide substrate. Journal of Enzyme Inhibition 3: 81–90.

Golicnik M (2002) On a nonelementary progress curve equation and its application in enzyme kinetics. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences 42: 157–161.

Gray PJ (1991) The effects of systematic errors on the analysis of irreversible enzyme inhibition progress curves. Biochemical Journal 257: 419–424.

Gray PJ and Duggleby RG (1989) Analysis of kinetic data for irreversible enzyme inhibition. Biochemical Journal 257: 419–424.

Hadad N, Feng W and Shoshan‐Barmatz V (1999) Modification of ryanodine receptor/Ca2+ release channel with dinitrofluorobenzene. Biochemical Journal 342: 239–248.

Kawasaki Y, Sato K, Shinmoto H and Dosako S (2000) Role of basic residues of human lactoferrin in the interaction with B lymphocytes. Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry 64: 314–318.

Kitz R and Wilson IB (1962) Esters of methanesulfonic acid as irreversible inhibitors of acetylcholinesterase. Journal of Biological Chemistry 337: 3245.

Lemke HD, Bergmeyer J, Straub J and Oesterhelt D (1982) Reversible inhibition of the proton pump bacteriorhodopsin by modification of tyrosine 64. Journal of Biological Chemistry 257: 9384–9388.

Liu W and Tsou CL (1986) Determination of rate constants for the irreversible inhibition of acetylcholine esterase by continuously monitoring the substrate reaction in the presence of the inhibitor. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 870: 185–190.

Liu W, Zhao KY and Tsou C (1985) Reactivation kinetics of diethylphosphoryl acetylcholine esterase. European Journal of Biochemistry 151: 525–529.

MacInnes I, Schorstein DE, Suckling CJ and Wrigglesworth R (1981) Latent inhibitors. Part 2. Allylic inhibitors of alcohol dehydrogenase. Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions I: 1103–1108.

Minelli A, Charteris AT, Voltattorni CB and John RA (1979) Reactions of DOPA (3,4‐dihydroxyphenylalanine) decarboxylase with DOPA. Biochemical Journal 183: 361–368.

Navarro‐Lozano MJ, Valero E, Váron R and Garcia‐Carmona F (1995) Kinetic study of an enzyme‐catalysed reaction in the presence of novel irreversible‐type inhibitors that react with the product of enzymatic catalysis. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 57: 157–168.

Nichols DJ, Keeling PL, Spalding M and Guan H (2000) Involvement of conserved aspartate and glutamate residues in the catalysis and substrate binding of maize starch synthase. Biochemistry 39: 7820–7825.

Palfreyman MG, Bey P and Sjoerdsma A (1987) Enzyme‐activated/mechanism‐based inhibitors. In: Marshall RD and Tipton KF (eds) Essays in Biochemistry, vol. 23, pp. 27–81. London: Academic Press.

Rakitzis ET (1990) Kinetic analysis of regeneration by dilution of a covalently modified protein. Biochemical Journal 268: 669–670.

Rakitzis ET and Papandreou P (1999) Kinetic analysis of parallel reactions, the initial reactant of which presents with two interconvertible isomeric forms (hydrolysis and hydroxylaminolysis of 6‐phosphogluconolactone). Journal of Theoretical Biology 200: 427–434.

Ray WJ and Koshland DE (1961) A method for characterizing the type and numbers of groups involved in enzyme action. Journal of Biological Chemistry 236: 1973–1979.

Ronzio RA, Rowe WB and Meister A (1969) Studies on the mechanism of inhibition of glutamine synthetase by methionine sulfoximine. Biochemistry 8: 1066–1075.

Shaw E (1989) Active‐site‐directed irreversible inhibitors. In: Sandler M and Smith HJ (eds) Design of Enzyme Inhibitors as Drugs, pp. 49–69. London: Oxford University Press.

Soares AM, Guerra‐Sa R, Borja‐Oliveira CR et al. (2000) Structural and functional characterization of BnSP‐7, a Lys49 myotoxic phospholipase A(2) homologue from Bothrops neuwiedi pauloensis venom. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 378: 201–209.

Tatsunami S, Yago M and Hosoe M (1981) Kinetics of suicide substrates: steady‐state treatments and computer‐aided exact solutions. Biochemica et Biophysica Acta 662: 226–235.

Tian WX and Tsou C‐L (1982) Determination of the rate constant of enzyme modification by measuring the substrate reaction in the presence of the modifier. Biochemistry 21: 1028–1032.

Tipton KF (1996) Patterns of enzyme inhibition. In: Engel PC (ed.) Enzymology LabFax, pp. 115–174. Oxford: Bios Scientific Publishers. San Diego: Academic Press.

Tipton KF, Davey GP and McDonald AG (2011) Kinetic behavior and reversible inhibition of monoamine oxidases – enzymes that many want dead. International Review of Neurobiology 100: 43–64.

Tipton KF, McCrodden JM and Youdim MBH (1986) Oxidation and enzyme‐activated irreversible inhibition of rat liver monoamine oxidase‐B by 1‐methyl‐4‐phenyl‐1,2,3,6‐tetrahydropyridine (MPTP). Biochemical Journal 240: 379–383.

Topham CM (1990) A generalized theoretical treatment of the kinetics of an enzyme‐catalysed reaction in the presence of an unstable irreversible modifier. Journal of Theoretical Biology 145: 547–572.

Tsou C‐L (1962) Relation between modification of functional groups of proteins and their biological activity. I. A graphical method for the determination of the number and type of essential groups. Scientia Sinica 11: 1536–1538.

Tsubaki M, Kobayashi K, Ichise T, Takeuchi F and Tagawa S (2000) Diethyl pyrocarbonate modification abolishes fast electron accepting ability of cytochrome b561 from ascorbate but does not influence electron donation to monodehydroascorbate radical: identification of the modification sites by mass spectrometric analysis. Biochemistry 39: 3276–3284.

Varón R, García‐Cánovas F, García‐Moreno M et al. (2002) Kinetic analysis of the general modifier mechanism of Botts and Morales involving a suicide substrate. Journal of Theoretical Biology 218: 355–374.

Waley SG (1980) Kinetics of suicide substrates. Biochemical Journal 185: 771–775.

Waley SG (1985) Kinetics of suicide substrates: practical procedures for determining parameters. Biochemical Journal 277: 843–849.

Walker B and Elmore DT (1984) The irreversible inhibition of urokinase, kidney‐cell plasminogen activator, plasmin and β‐trypsin by 1‐(N‐6‐amino‐n‐hexyl)carbamoylimidazole. Biochemical Journal 221: 277–280.

Wen L, Miao ZW and Qing WD (1999) Chemical modification of xylanase from Trichosporon cutaneum shows the presence of carboxyl groups and cysteine residues essential for enzyme activity. Journal of Protein Chemistry 18: 677–686.

Wimalasena K and Haines DC (1996) A general progress curve method for the kinetic analysis of suicide enzyme inhibitors. Analytical Biochemistry 234: 175–182.

Wink MR, Buffon A, Bonan CD et al. (2000) Effect of protein‐modifying reagents on ecto‐apyrase from rat brain. International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology 32: 105–113.

Wiseman JS, Tayrien G and Abeles RH (1980) Kinetics of the reaction of cyclopropanone hydrate with yeast aldehyde dehydrogenase: a model for enzyme–substrate interaction. Biochemistry 19: 4222–4231.

Further Reading

Copeland RA (2005) Evaluation of Enzyme Inhibitors in Drug Discovery. Hoboken: Wiley–Interscience.

Fontana E, Dansette PM and Poli SM (2005) Cytochrome P450 enzymes mechanism based inhibitors: common sub‐structures and reactivity. Current Drug Metabolism 6: 413–454.

Giacobini E (ed.) (2000) Cholinesterases and Cholinesterase Inhibitors: Basic Preclinical and Clinical Aspects. London: Blackwell.

Lundblad RL (2005) Chemical Reagents for Protein Modification. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Means GE and Feeney RE (1993) Chemical modification of proteins. In: Chambers JAA and Rickwood D (eds) Biochemistry LabFax, pp. 215–245. Oxford: Bios Scientific Publishers. San Diego: Academic Press.

Purich DL (ed.) (2009) Contemporary Enzyme Kinetics and Mechanism, 3rd edn. New York: Academic Press.

Sandler M and Smith HJ (eds) (1989, 1994) Design of Enzyme Inhibitors as Drugs, vols 1, 2. London: Oxford University Press.

Schramm VL (2011) Enzymatic transition states, transition‐state analogs, dynamics, thermodynamics, and lifetimes. Annual Review of Biochemistry 80: 703–732.

Silverman RB (1995) Mechanism‐based enzyme inactivators. Methods in Enzymology 249: 240–283.

Wolfenden R (1999) Conformational aspects of inhibitor design: enzyme‐substrate interactions in the transition state. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry 7: 647–652.

Zollner H (1999) Handbook of Enzyme Inhibitors, 3rd edn. Weinheim: Wiley‐VCH.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
McDonald, Andrew G, and Tipton, Keith F(Jun 2012) Enzymes: Irreversible Inhibition. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0000601.pub2]