Protein Kinases: Signatures in Cancer

Since the discovery of the first protein kinase crystal structure, structures of over 50 protein kinases have been solved. This crystallographic tour-de-force has catalysed structure-based design of specific inhibitors, resulting in over 100 000 patent protected molecules. One-third of the pharmaceutical industry R&D worldwide is directed towards kinase inhibition. Concerted efforts resulted in Food and Drug Administration approval for several drugs including the most successful oncology drug – imatinib (Gleevec) developed by Novartis. The challenge now is to overcome drug resistance and increase drug efficacy through genetic patient stratification in clinical trials and clinical practice. Clinical data of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequences that contain key genes serve as the basis for establishing signatures for responding patients and allow the ‘tailoring’ of a particular drug to specific patient populations. Such a signature-based approach can enhance the value of already approved drugs and may be used to treat patients with different cancer subtypes.

Key concepts:

  • All kinase inhibitors that are FDA approved as first in line oncology drugs compete with ATP binding to the kinase catalytic core.
  • Clinical responses of CML cancer patients to imatinib depend on the specific genetic signatures of the patients.
  • Resistance of CML patients to imatinib can be overcome by structure-based redesigning of the inhibitor molecule.
  • Imatinib can treat cancer patients with very different cancer subtypes, such as CML and GIST.
  • CML and GIST patients responding to imatinib have common activating kinase mutations.
  • Only 10% of NSCLC patients respond to gefitinib or erlotinib; these responding patients have specific genetic signatures.
  • Activating mutants of responding NSCLC patients have a lower affinity to ATP.
  • There is a common site in the catalytic core of kinases where mutations can lead to higher affinity to ATP and this site can also be associated with patients who develop resistance to imatinib, gefinitib and erlotinib.

Keywords: kinase; cancer; drug design; drug resistance; Gleevec; activating mutations

Figure 1. ATP competitive inhibition of catalytic cores of protein kinases. Key tenets of structure-based design of inhibitors utilizing inactive and active conformation of catalytic cores. (a) Schematic representation of the conserved catalytic core of the protein kinase family: a, N-terminal domain; b, C-terminal domain; c, inhibitor bounding at the cleft between the two domains potentially involving (f, e) two hydrophobic pockets and d, hydrogen bonds (one, two or three) that anchor the inhibitor to the linker between the N- and C-terminal lobes. Protein kinases exist in inactive-unphosphorylated form (g, green) and active phosphorylated form (g, yellow). (b) On phoshorylation the activation loop (g) undergoes conformational changes and creates a template for the protein substrate. Inhibitor binding interaction differs for the unphosphorylated (inactive, green) and phosphorylated (active, yellow) states of protein kinase. (c) Ribbon diagram of the crystal structures of active insulin receptor (IR) kinase domain in the ‘open’ apoprotein conformation (1IRK.pdb; Hubbard et al., 1994) with the activation loop (green) in the inactive unphosphorylated state. (d) IR in the ‘closed’ ATP-bound conformation with the activation loop (yellow) in the active triphosphorylated state (phosphotyrosines – stick) (1GAG.pdb; Parang et al., 2001). (e) Ribbon diagram of the crystal structure of active protein kinase A (PKA) kinase domain in the ‘open’ apoprotein (1CTP.pdb; Karlsson et al., 1993) with the activation loop (yellow) in the active state (phosphothreonine – stick) and (f) the ‘closed’ ATP-bound conformations of PKA with a bound ATP analogue (stick) (1ATP.pdb; Zheng et al., 1993) with the activation loop (yellow) in the active state (phosphothreonine – stick). The ‘open’ and ‘closed’ conformations relative to the ATP-binding pocket of fully active protein kinase result from the rotation and translation of the N-terminal lobe in respect to the C-terminal lobe. The axis of rotation passes through the region linking the N- and C-terminal lobes. The red residue marks the ‘gatekeeper’ residue M1076 in IR and M120 in PKA. Substrate peptides, or peptide inhibitors, are represented as magenta ribbons.
Figure 2. Fighting off patients' resistance through reversible inhibition by going after both inactive and active conformations of catalytic core of c-Abl kinase. Structure-based design of reversible inhibitors aiming at CML patients' resistance to imatinib. (a) Co-crystal structure of imatinib bound to the inactive unphosphorylated catalytic core of c-Abl (2HYY.pdb; Cowan-Jacob et al., 2007). (b) Co-crystal structure of nilotinib bound to the inactive unphosphorylated catalytic core of c-Abl (3CS9.pdb; Weisberg et al., 2005). (c) Co-crystal structure of desatinib bound to the active phosphorylated catalytic core of c-Abl (2GQG.pdb; Tokarski et al., 2006). Chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patient drug resistant mutations (O'Hare et al., 2007) for each drug are mapped on the co-crystals structures to illustrate the general location within the catalytic core (side chains displayed are the native structure and not the mutation). Green side-chains (sticks) are of intermediate resistance, whereas red side-chain positions (sticks) are for strong resistance. A common, strong drug resistant mutant T315I (red) in CML cancer patients lies in the conserved linker region next to the axis of rotation of the N-terminal lobe. Drug space filling models and chemical structures with ligand hydrogen bond interactions with the enzyme are shown on the left side of panels a, b and c.
Figure 3. Fighting off resistance through irreversible inhibition. Structure-based design of reversible and irreversible inhibitors of active conformation of EGFR kinase catalytic core. (a) Gefinitib bound to the catalytic core of EGFR containing the wild-type T790 (red) with the activation loop in the active conformation, but unphosphorylated (2ITY.pdb; Yun et al., 2007). (b) Irreversible inhibitor HKI-272 bound to the catalytic core of EGFR-containing mutant T790M (red) with the activation loop in the active conformation, but unphosphorylated (2JIV.pdb; Yun et al., 2008). Drug chemical structures and space filling models along with hydrogen-bond network interactions with the enzyme are on the left sides of panels a and b.
Figure 4. Inhibiting downstream kinases. Structure-based design of MEK inhibitor with the first non-ATP competitive inhibitor of kinase and the structure-based design of PI3 kinase inhibitors. (a) Co-crystal structure of MEK kinase domain with inhibitor clinical candidate PD 0325901 and ADP (3EQG.pdb; Fischmann et al., 2009). (i) Chemical structures of ligands and hydrogen bond network interactions between ligands and the enzyme along with a (ii) space-filling models. (iii) A ribbon drawing of MEK kinase in complex with ADP and PD 0325901. The activation region (yellow) forms a helix. Inhibitors of MEK are unique to the vast majority of protein kinase inhibitors, the mode of binding at a site adjacent to ATP, so that the inhibitor is noncompetitive with ATP. The analogous gatekeeper residue, M143, is positioned in contact with both the ATP and PD 0325901 inhibitor. (b) PI3 kinase gamma with inhibitor GDC0941 (3DBS.pdb; Folkes et al., 2008). (i) Chemical structure of inhibitor GDC0941 and the hydrogen bond interactions with the enzyme along with a (ii) space-filling model of GDC0941. (iii) A ribbon drawing of PI3K gamma with the extended N-terminal region (magenta), the kinase N-terminal domain (blue), the kinase C-termial domain (light blue), the activation loop (yellow), the gatekeeper residue I879 (red), and GDC0941 (stick).
Figure 5. Going ‘downstream’  Cancer-activated kinases in RAS/B-RAF/MEK and PI3KA/mTOR/AKT phosphate signalling pathways. Receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) and downstream kinases with cancer-activating mutations are outlined in dark blue. Activating mutations have been identified in chronic myeloid leukaemia, gastrointestinal stromal cancer, nonsmall cell lung cancer, skin melanoma cancer and in colon cancer.
close
 References
    Barker AJ, Gibson KH, Grundy W et al. (2001) Studies leading to the identification of ZD1839 (IRESSA): an orally active, selective epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeted to the treatment of cancer. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 11: 1911–1914.
    Carey KD, Garton AJ, Romero MS et al. (2006) Kinetic analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor somatic mutant proteins shows increased sensitivity to the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor erlotinib. Cancer Research 66: 8163–8171.
    Corbin AS, Bachdunger E, Pascal F and Druker BJ (2002) Analysis of the structural basis of specificity of inhibition of the Abl kinase by STI571. Journal of Biological Chemistry 277: 32214–32219.
    Corless CL, Fletcher JA and Heinrich MC (2004) Biology of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Journal of Clinical Oncology 22: 3813–3825.
    Cowan-Jacob SW, Fendrich G, Floersheimer A et al. (2007) Structural biology contributions to the discovery of drugs to treat chronic myelogenous leukaemia. Acta Crystallographica Section D 63: 80–93.
    Debiec-Rychter M, Sciot R, Le Cesne A et al. (2006) KIT mutations and dose selection for imatinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. European Journal of Cancer 42: 1093–1103.
    Druker BJ, Guilhot F, O'Brien SG et al. (2006) Five-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia. New England Journal of Medicine 355: 2408–2417.
    Fabbro D, Ruetz S, Buchdunger E et al. (2002) Protein kinases as targets for anticancer agents: from inhibitors to useful drugs. Pharmacology & Therapeutics 93: 79–98.
    Fabian MA, Biggs WH 3rd, Treiber DK et al. (2005) A small molecule-kinase interaction map for clinical kinase inhibitors. Nature Biotechnology 23: 329–336.
    Fischmann T, Smith C, Mayhood T et al. (2009) Crystal structures of MEK1 binary and ternary complexes with nucleotides and inhibitors. Biochemistry 48: 2661–2674.
    Folkes AJ, Ahmadi K, Alderton WK et al. (2008) The identification of 2-(1H-indazol-4-yl)-6-(4-methanesulfonyl-piperazin-1-ylmethyl)-4-morpholin-4-yl-thieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine (GDC-0941) as a potent, selective, orally bioavailable inhibitor of class I PI3 kinase for the treatment of cancer. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 51: 5522–5532.
    Furet P, Caravetti G, Lydon N et al. (1995) Modeling study of protein kinase inhibitors: binding mode of staurosporine origin of the selectivity of CGP 52411. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 9: 465–472.
    Heinrich MC, Corless CL, Duensing A et al. (2003) PDGFRA-activating mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Science 299: 708–710.
    Hirota S, Isozaki K, Moriyama Y et al. (1998) Gain of function of c-kit in human gastrointestinal tumors. Science 279: 577–580.
    Hoeben A, Schoffski P and Debiec-Rychter M (2008) Clinical implications of mutational analysis in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. British Journal of Cancer 98: 684–688.
    Hubbard SR, Wei L, Ellis L and Hendrickson WA (1994) Crystal structure of the tyrosine kinase domain of the human insulin receptor. Nature 372: 746–754.
    Karlsson R, Zheng J, Xuong N, Taylor SS and Sowadski JM (1993) Structure of the mammalian catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase and an inhibitor peptide displays an open conformation. Acta Crystallographica Section D 49: 381–388.
    Knighton DR, Cadena DL, Zheng J-H et al. (1993) Structural features that specify tyrosine kinase activity deduced from homology modeling of the EGF receptor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 90: 5001–5005.
    Knighton DR, Zheng J, Ten Eyck LF et al. (1991a) Crystal structure of the catalytic subunit of cyclic adenosine monophosphate-dependent protein kinase. Science 253: 407–414.
    Knighton DR, Zheng J-H, Ten Eyck LF et al. (1991b) Structure of a peptide inhibitor bound to the catalytic subunit of cyclic adenosine monophosphate-dependent protein kinase. Science 253: 414–420.
    Kobayashi S, Boggon TJ, Dayaram T et al. (2005) EGFR mutations and resistance of non-small cell lung cancer to gefinitib. New England Journal of Medicine 352: 786–792.
    Kumar A, Petri ET, Halmos B and Boggon TJ (2008) Structure and clinical relevance of the epidermal growth factor receptor in human cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 26: 1742–1751.
    Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R et al. (2004) Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. New England Journal of Medicine 350: 2129–2139.
    Mardsen BD and Knapp S (2008) Doing more than just the structure-structural genomics in kinase drug discovery. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 12: 40–45.
    Mellinghoff IK, Wang MY, Vivanco I et al. (2005) Molecular determinants of the response of glioblastomas to EGFR kinase inhibitors. New England Journal of Medicine 353: 2012–2024.
    Michaloglu C, Vredeveld LCW, Mooi WJ and Peeper DS (2008) BRAF E600 in benign and malignant human tumors. Oncogene 27: 877–895.
    Moyer JD, Barbacci EG, Iwata KK et al. (1997) Induction of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest by CP-358,774, an inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase. Cancer Research 57: 4838–4848.
    Niho S, Kubota K, Goto K et al. (2006) First-line single agent treatment with genfitinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study. Journal of Clinical Oncology 24: 64–69.
    O'Hare T, Eide CA and Deininger MWN (2007) Bcr-Abl kinase domain mutations, drug resistance and the road to a cure for chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 110: 2242–2249.
    Parang K, Till JH, Ablooglu AJ et al. (2001) Mechanism-based design of a protein kinase inhibitor. Nature Structural Biology 8: 37–41.
    Sharma SV, Bell DW, Settleman J and Haber DA (2007) Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer. Nature Reviews 7: 169–181.
    Solit DB, Garraway LA, Pratilas CA et al. (2006) BRAF mutation predicts sensitivity to MEK inhibition. Nature 439: 358–362.
    Southall NT and Ajay   (2006) Kinase patent space visualization using chemical replacement. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 49: 2103–2109.
    book Sowadski JM and Epstein LF (2001) Protein Kinases. Encyclopedia of Life Sciences Macmillan London. London: Nature Publishing Group.
    Sowadski JM, Epstein LF, Lankiewicz L and Karlsson R (1999) Conformational diversity of catalytic cores of protein kinases. Pharmacology & Therapeutics 82: 157–164.
    Tokarski JS, Newitt J, Chang CYJ et al. (2006) The structure of dasanitib (BMS-354825) bound to activated ABL kinase domain elucidates its inhibitory activity against imatinib-resistant ABL mutants. Cancer Research 66: 5790–5797.
    Wan PT, Garnett MJ, Roe SM et al. (2004) Mechanism of activation of the RAF-ERK signaling pathway by oncogenic mutations of BRAF. Cell 116: 855–867.
    Weisberg E, Manley PW, Breitenstein W et al. (2005) Characterization of AMN107, a selective inhibitor of native and mutant Bcr-Abl. Cancer Cell 7: 129–141.
    Wissner A and Mansour TS (2008) The development of HKI-272 and related compounds for the treatment of cancer. Archiv der Pharmazie 341: 465–477.
    Yun C-H, Boggon TJ, Li Y et al. (2007) Structures of lung cancer-derived EGFR mutants and inhibitor complexes: mechanism of activation and insights into differential inhibitor sensitivity. Cancer Cell 11: 217–227.
    Yun CH, Mengwasser KE, Toms AV et al. (2008) The T790M mutation in EGFR kinase causes drug resistance by increasing the affinity for ATP. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of the USA 105: 2070–2075.
    Zheng J, Trafny EA, Knighton DR et al. (1993) 2.2 A refined crystal structure of the catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase complexed with MnATP and a peptide inhibitor. Acta Crystallographica Section D 49: 362–365.
 Further Reading
    Gray JW and Chin L (2008) Translating insights from cancer genome into clinical practice. Nature 425: 553–563.
    Johnson LN (2009) Protein kinase inhibitors: contributions from structure to clinical compounds. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics 42: 1–40.
    Liao JJ-L (2007) Molecular recognition of protein kinase binding pockets for design of potent and selective kinase inhibitors. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 50: 409–424.
    Sawyers CL (2008) The cancer biomarker problem. Nature 452: 548–552.
    Trusheim MR, Berndt ER and Douglas FL (2007) Stratified medicine: strategic and economic implications of combining drugs and clinical biomarkers. Nature Drug Discovery 6: 287–293.
    Zhang J, Yang PL and Gray NS (2009) Targeting cancer with small molecule kinase inhibitors. Nature 9: 28–39.
Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Sowadski, Janusz M, and Suto, Robert K(Dec 2009) Protein Kinases: Signatures in Cancer. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0000659.pub2]