Secoviridae: A Family of Plant Picorna‐Like Viruses with Monopartite or Bipartite Genomes


Members of the family Secoviridae, referred to as secovirids, are plant viruses that share features with animal and human viruses of the family Picornaviridae and other insect or marine viruses of the order Picornavirales. These common features include a conserved structure of the icosahedral virus particles, the expression of viral proteins by proteolytic cleavage of large polyproteins and viral replication proteins with conserved sequence motifs, including the viral RNA‐dependent RNA polymerase and protease. Secovirids also share the distinguishing feature of encoding specialised proteins that enable their movement in plant and counteract plant defence mechanisms, such as RNA silencing. The family Secoviridae includes eight genera. Members of the genera Comovirus, Fabavirus, Nepovirus, Cheravirus, Sadwavirus and Torradovirus have a bipartite positive‐strand RNA genome, whereas members of the genera Sequivirus and Waikavirus have a monopartite genome.

Key Concepts

  • Many plant viruses are related to animal and human viruses of the family Picornaviridae and to other picorna‐like viruses infecting algae and arthropods.
  • A recent update in the taxonomy of plant picorna‐like viruses has led to the creation of the family Secoviridae which amalgamates the previous families Comoviridae and Sequiviridae as well as the genera Cheravirus, Sequivirus and Torradovirus.
  • Secovirids share common characteristics including having both similar virus particle structures and genomic organizations and requiring specialised proteins to facilitate their movement within the host plant or counteract plant defence mechanism.
  • Secovirids produce their proteins in the form of large polyproteins that are cleaved at specific sites by a viral protease.
  • Replication of the viral RNA occurs in large protein complexes in association with intracellular membranes from the host.
  • Plant cells infected with secovirids generally display tubular structures that are composed of the viral movement protein, contain virus‐like particles and traverse the cell wall. These tubular structures are involved in the movement of the virus from cell to cell.
  • Secovirids can be transmitted through seeds and pollen or with the help of nematode or arthropod vectors and their spread in the field is largely dependent on their mode of transmission.
  • Some secovirids have been successfully exploited as plant vectors, allowing epitope presentation for vaccine production, expression of proteins in plants and silencing of endogenous plant genes.

Keywords: picornavirales; protease; virus taxonomy; plant–virus interactions; cell‐to‐cell movement; virus replication

Figure 1. Compared architecture of the capsids of members of the family Secoviridae. In all members of the order Picornavirales, the capsid is formed from 60 subunits (shown at the right of the figure). In the case of human and animal viruses belonging to the family Picornaviridae and of some plant picorna‐like viruses (sequiviruses, waikaviruses, cheraviruses and torradoviruses), each subunit is made up of three proteins, VP1–VP3, and each protein is folded as a single barrel (top of the figure). In comoviruses, fabaviruses and sadwaviruses (middle), the domains corresponding to VP2 and VP3 are fused into a single protein (large coat protein, L) folded in two barrels (Lin et al., ), whereas the VP1 domain is contained in a separate protein folded in a single barrel (small coat protein, S). In nepoviruses (bottom), the three domains are fused into a single coat protein (CP) folded in three barrels (Le Gall et al., ; Chandrasekar and Johnson, ; Seitsonen et al., ).
Figure 2. Genomic organization of members of the family Secoviridae compared with that of Human enterovirus‐C (HEV‐C), a typical member of the family Picornaviridae. The RNA genome is depicted with a horizontal line. The circle at the 5′ end of the genome represents the VPg protein bound to the 5′ end of the RNA (open circle: the presence of a VPg is probable but has not been confirmed experimentally). The polyadenylated tail is also shown at the 3′ end of the RNA (An). The single large polyprotein encoded by a large open reading frame in the RNA of most secovirids is shown with boxes. Vertical lines within the polyproteins represent cleavage sites that have been identified experimentally (solid lines) or that are deduced based on sequence comparisons (dotted lines). Regions of the polyproteins that are conserved among secovirids are shown in yellow (replication proteins), blue (CPs) and green (MP). Highly conserved motifs are represented by the star (RNA‐dependent RNA polymerase motif), the diamond (protease motif), the triangle (nucleotide‐binding site motif within the putative helicase domain) and the red circle (protease cofactor motif). Hatched areas within the open reading frame or broken lines below the untranslated regions indicate areas that are identical between RNA1 and RNA2. In torradoviruses and waikaviruses, additional open reading frames are shown by the smaller boxes above the larger open reading frame. In the case of comoviruses, the two narrow boxes in RNA2 represent alternative translation initiation at two different AUGs to produce two overlapping polyproteins. After proteolytic cleavage of these polyproteins, the 58‐kDa protein (shown in white) will be released from the larger polyprotein and the MP (shown in green) will be released from the smaller polyprotein. Virus abbreviations are as in Table.
Figure 3. Electron micrograph depicting purified nepovirus particles. Purified particles from a Tomato ringspot virus isolate in negative staining. Note the empty particle, which is penetrated by the negative stain (arrow). Bar represents 25 nm. Reprinted from Sanfacon H (2008) © Elsevier.
Figure 4. Hierarchical clustering of members of the family Secoviridae and selected members of the order Picornavirales based on the Pro‐Pol amino acid sequence. The families and genera are delineated on the right. Amino acid sequences between the conserved CG motif in the protease and the conserved GDD motif in the RNA‐dependent RNA polymerase were aligned (Le Gall et al., ; Sanfacon et al., ). Results are presented as a phylogram with Potato virus Y (PVY, a member of the family Potyviridae), used as an outgroup. Black circles indicate nodes supported by bootstrap values above 85%. Virus acronyms are as defined in Tables and . Additional acronyms are as follows: HaRNAV (Heterosigma akashiwo RNA virus), CrPV (Cricket paralysis virus), IFV (Infectious flacherie virus), HAV (Hepatitis A virus), FMDV (Foot‐and‐mouth disease virus), EMCV (Encephalomyocarditis virus) and ERBV (Equine rhinitis B virus).
Figure 5. Electron micrograph depicting cytopathological structures typical of nepovirus‐infected cells. (a) Proliferation of membrane vesicles observed in the vicinity of the nucleus (Nc) in cells infected with a Tomato ringspot virus isolate. (b) Tubular structures containing virus‐like particles accumulating near the cell wall (CW) in cells infected with a Peach rosette mosaic virus isolate. (c) Tubular structure traversing the cell wall in cells infected with an Arabis mosaic virus isolate. Bars represent 200 nm. Reprinted from Sanfacon H (2008) © Elsevier.


Allaire M, Chernaia MM, Malcolm BA and James MN (1994) Picornaviral 3C cysteine proteinases have a fold similar to chymotrypsin‐like serine proteinases. Nature 369: 72–76.

Amari K, Boutant E, Hofmann C, et al. (2010) A family of plasmodesmal proteins with receptor‐like properties for plant viral movement proteins. PLOS pathogens 6: e1001119.

Amari K, Lerich A, Schmitt‐Keichinger C, Dolja VV and Ritzenthaler C (2011) Tubule‐guided cell‐to‐cell movement of a plant virus requires class XI myosin motors. PLOS Pathogens 7: e1002327.

Argos P, Kamer G, Nicklin MJ and Wimmer E (1984) Similarity in gene organization and homology between proteins of animal picornaviruses and a plant comovirus suggest common ancestry of these virus families. Nucleic Acids Research 12: 7251–7267.

Bazan JF and Fletterick RJ (1988) Viral cysteine proteases are homologous to the trypsin‐like family of serine proteases: structural and functional implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 85: 7872–7876.

Bruening G (1990) Replication of satellite RNA of tobacco ringspot virus. Seminars in Virology 1: 127–134.

Canizares MC, Taylor KM and Lomonossoff GP (2004) Surface‐exposed C‐terminal amino acids of the small coat protein of Cowpea mosaic virus are required for suppression of silencing. Journal of General Virology 85: 3431–3435.

Carette JE, Verver J, Martens J, et al. (2002) Characterization of plant proteins that interact with cowpea mosaic virus '60K' protein in the yeast two‐hybrid system. Journal of General Virology 83: 885–893.

Carrier K, Hans F and Sanfacon H (1999) Mutagenesis of amino acids at two tomato ringspot nepovirus cleavage sites: effect on proteolytic processing in cis and in trans by the 3C‐like protease. Virology 258: 161–175.

Carrier K, Xiang Y and Sanfacon H (2001) Genomic organization of RNA2 of Tomato ringspot virus: processing at a third cleavage site in the N‐terminal region of the polyprotein in vitro. Journal of General Virology 82: 1785–1790.

Carvalho CM, Wellink J, Ribeiro SG, Goldbach RW and Van Lent JW (2003) The C‐terminal region of the movement protein of Cowpea mosaic virus is involved in binding to the large but not to the small coat protein. Journal of General Virology 84: 2271–2277.

Chandrasekar V and Johnson JE (1998) The structure of tobacco ringspot virus: a link in the evolution of icosahedral capsids in the picornavirus superfamily. Structure 6: 157–171.

Chen ZG, Stauffacher C, Li Y, et al. (1989) Protein‐RNA interactions in an icosahedral virus at 3.0 A resolution. Science 245: 154–159.

Chisholm J, Zhang G, Wang A and Sanfacon H (2007) Peripheral association of a polyprotein precursor form of the RNA‐dependent RNA polymerase of Tomato ringspot virus with the membrane‐bound viral replication complex. Virology 368: 133–144.

Dorssers L, Van der Kroll S, Van der Meer J, Van Kammen A and Zabel P (1984) Purification of cowpea mosaic virus RNA replication complex: identification of a virus‐encoded 110,000‐dalton polypeptide responsible for RNA chain elongation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 81: 1951–1955.

Franssen H, Leunissen J, Goldbach R, Lomonossoff G and Zimmern D (1984) Homologous sequences in non‐structural proteins from cowpea mosaic virus and picornaviruses. The EMBO Journal 3: 855–861.

Gaire F, Schmitt C, Stussi‐Garaud C, Pinck L and Ritzenthaler C (1999) Protein 2A of grapevine fanleaf nepovirus is implicated in RNA2 replication and colocalizes to the replication site. Virology 264: 25–36.

Ghoshal B and Sanfacon H (2014) Temperature‐dependent symptom recovery in Nicotiana benthamiana plants infected with tomato ringspot virus is associated with reduced translation of viral RNA2 and requires ARGONAUTE 1. Virology 456–457: 188–197.

Gorbalenya AE, Donchenko AP, Blinov VM and Koonin EV (1989) Cysteine proteases of positive strand RNA viruses and chymotrypsin‐like serine proteases. A distinct protein superfamily with a common structural fold. FEBS Letters 243: 103–114.

Hemmer O, Oncino C and Fritsch C (1993) Efficient replication of the in vitro transcripts from cloned cDNA of tomato black ring virus satellite RNA requires the 48K satellite RNA‐encoded protein. Virology 194: 800–806.

Huet H, Mahendra S, Wang J, et al. (1999) Near immunity to rice tungro spherical virus achieved in rice by a replicase‐mediated resistance strategy. Phytopathology 89: 1022–1027.

Isogai M, Tatuto N, Ujiie C, Watanabe M and Yoshikawa N (2012) Identification and characterization of blueberry latent spherical virus, a new member of subgroup C in the genus Nepovirus. Archives of Virology 157: 297–303.

Isogai M, Watanabe K, Uchidate Y and Yoshikawa N (2006) Protein‐protein‐ and protein‐RNA‐binding properties of the movement protein and VP25 coat protein of Apple latent spherical virus. Virology 352: 178–187.

Jelly NS, Schellenbaum P, Walter B and Maillot P (2012) Transient expression of artificial microRNAs targeting Grapevine fanleaf virus and evidence for RNA silencing in grapevine somatic embryos. Transgenic Research 21: 1319–1327.

Jovel J, Walker M and Sanfacon H (2007) Recovery of Nicotiana benthamiana plants from a necrotic response induced by a nepovirus is associated with RNA silencing but not with reduced virus titer. Journal of Virology 81: 12285–12297.

Karetnikov A and Lehto K (2008) Translation mechanisms involving long‐distance base pairing interactions between the 5' and 3' non‐translated regions and internal ribosomal entry are conserved for both genomic RNAs of Blackcurrant reversion nepovirus. Virology 371: 292–308.

Karran RA and Sanfacon H (2014) Tomato ringspot virus coat protein binds to ARGONAUTE 1 and suppresses the translation repression of a reporter gene. Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions 27: 933–943.

Laliberte JF and Sanfacon H (2010) Cellular remodeling during plant virus infection. Annual Review of Phytopathology 48: 69–91.

Lai‐Kee‐Him J, Schellenberger P, Dumas C, et al. (2013) The backbone model of the Arabis mosaic virus reveals new insights into functional domains of Nepovirus capsid. Journal of Structural Biology 182: 1–9.

Le Gall O, Candresse T and Dunez J (1995) Transfer of the 3' non‐translated region of grapevine chrome mosaic virus RNA‐1 by recombination to tomato black ring virus RNA‐2 in pseudorecombinant isolates. Journal of General Virology 76: 1285–1289.

Le Gall O, Christian P, Fauquet CM, et al. (2008) Picornavirales, a proposed order of positive‐sense single‐stranded RNA viruses with a pseudo‐T = 3 virion architecture. Archives of Virology 153: 715–727.

Le Gall O, Sanfacon H, Ikegami M, et al. (2007) Cheravirus and Sadwavirus: two unassigned genera of plant positive‐sense single‐stranded RNA viruses formerly considered atypical members of the genus Nepovirus (family Comoviridae). Archives of Virology 159: 1767–1774.

Li C, Sasaki N, Isogai M and Yoshikawa N (2004) Stable expression of foreign proteins in herbaceous and apple plants using Apple latent spherical virus RNA2 vectors. Archives of Virology 149: 1541–1558.

Lin J, Ali AK, Chen P, et al. (2013) A stem‐loop structure in the 5' untranslated region of Bean pod mottle virus RNA2 is specifically required for RNA2 accumulation. Journal of General Virology 94: 1415–1420.

Lin J, Chen Z, Usha R, et al. (1999) The refined crystal structure of cowpea mosaic virus at 2.8 A resolution. Virology 265: 20–34.

Lin J, Guo J, Finer J, et al. (2014) The bean pod mottle virus RNA2‐encoded 58‐kilodalton protein P58 is required in cis for RNA2 accumulation. Journal of Virology 88: 3213–3222.

Nolke G, Cobanov P, Uhde‐Holzem K, et al. (2009) Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV)‐specific antibodies confer GFLV and Arabis mosaic virus (ArMV) resistance in Nicotiana benthamiana. Molecular Plant Pathology 10: 41–49.

Peters SA, Voorhorst WG, Wery J, Wellink J and van Kammen A (1992) A regulatory role for the 32K protein in proteolytic processing of cowpea mosaic virus polyproteins. Virology 191: 81–89.

Ratcliff F, Harrison BD and Baulcombe DC (1997) A similarity between viral defense and gene silencing in plants. Science 276: 1558–1560.

Rott ME, Tremaine JH and Rochon DM (1991) Comparison of the 5' and 3' termini of tomato ringspot virus RNA1 and RNA2: evidence for RNA recombination. Virology 185: 468–472.

Sainsbury F, Canizares MC and Lomonossoff GP (2010) Cowpea mosaic virus: the plant virus‐based biotechnology workhorse. Annual Review of Phytopathology 48: 437–455.

Sanfacon H (2013) Investigating the role of viral integral membrane proteins in promoting the assembly of nepovirus and comovirus replication factories. Frontiers in Plant Science 3: 313.

Sanfacon H, Wellink J, Le Gall O, et al. (2009) Secoviridae: a proposed family of plant viruses within the order Picornavirales that combines the families Sequiviridae and Comoviridae, the unassigned genera Cheravirus and Sadwavirus, and the proposed genus Torradovirus. Archives of Virology 154: 899–907.

Santovito E, Mascia T, Siddiqui SA, et al. (2014) Infection cycle of artichoke italian latent virus in tobacco plants: meristem invasion and recovery from disease symptoms. PLoS One 9: e99446.

Schellenberger P, Sauter C, Lorber B, et al. (2011) Structural insights into viral determinants of nematode mediated Grapevine fanleaf virus transmission. PLOS pathogens 7: e1002034.

Seitsonen JJ, Susi P, Lemmetty A and Butcher SJ (2008) Structure of the mite‐transmitted Blackcurrant reversion nepovirus using electron cryo‐microscopy. Virology 378: 162–168.

Turnbull‐Ross AD, Reavy B, Mayo MA and Murant AF (1992) The nucleotide sequence of parsnip yellow fleck virus: a plant picorna‐like virus. Journal of General Virology 73: 3203–3211.

Verbeek M, Dullemans AM, van den Heuvel JF, Maris PC and van der Vlugt RA (2007) Identification and characterisation of tomato torrado virus, a new plant picorna‐like virus from tomato. Archives of Virology 152: 881–890.

Vigne E, Komar V and Fuchs M (2004) Field safety assessment of recombination in transgenic grapevines expressing the coat protein gene of Grapevine fanleaf virus. Transgenic Research 13: 165–179.

Wang A and Sanfacon H (2000) Proteolytic processing at a novel cleavage site in the N‐terminal region of the tomato ringspot nepovirus RNA‐1‐encoded polyprotein in vitro. Journal of General Virology 81: 2771–2781.

Wetzel T, Chisholm J, Bassler A and Sanfacon H (2008) Characterization of proteinase cleavage sites in the N‐terminal region of the RNA1‐encoded polyprotein from Arabis mosaic virus (subgroup A nepovirus). Virology 375: 159–169.

Wetzel T, Chisholm J, Dupuis‐Maguiraga L, Bassler A and Sanfacon H (2013) In vitro and in vivo evidence for differences in the protease activity of two arabis mosaic nepovirus isolates and their impact on the infectivity of chimeric cDNA clones. Virology 446: 102–111.

Yaegashi H, Yamatsuta T, Takahashi T, et al. (2007) Characterization of virus‐induced gene silencing in tobacco plants infected with apple latent spherical virus. Archives of Virology 152: 1839–1849.

Zhang C and Ghabrial SA (2006) Development of Bean pod mottle virus‐based vectors for stable protein expression and sequence‐specific virus‐induced gene silencing in soybean. Virology 344: 401–411.

Further Reading

King AMQ, Adams MJ, Carstens EB Lefkowitz EJ (2012) Virus Taxonomy, Ninth Report of the International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV). [See in particular chapters on Picornavirales (pp. 835–839) and Secoviridae (pp. 881–899)]. London: Elsevier/Academic Press. For updates to virus taxonomy that occurred after publication of the Ninth Report, please refer to the following ICTV URL:].

Mahy BWJ and Van Regenmortel MH (eds) (2008) Encyclopedia of Virology, 3rd edn. Vol. 3, pp. 405–413. [See in particular chapters on Cowpea mosaic virus (pp. 569–574), Nepovirus (pp. 405–413) and Sadwavirus (pp. 523–526).] Oxford: Elsevier.

Pouwels J, Carette JE, Van Lent J and Wellink J (2002) Cowpea mosaic virus: effects on host cell processes. Molecular Plant Pathology 3: 411–418.

Sanfacon H, Zhang G, Chisholm J, Jafarpour B and Jovel J (2006) Molecular biology of Tomato ringspot nepovirus, a pathogen of ornamentals, small fruits and fruit trees. In: Teixeira da Silva J, (ed). Floriculture, Ornamental and Plant Biotechnology: Advances and Topical Issues, 1st edn. Vol. 3, pp. 540–546. London, UK: Global Science Books.

Susi P (2004) Black currant reversion virus, a mite‐transmitted nepovirus. Molecular Plant Pathology 5: 167–173.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Sanfaçon, Hélène(Apr 2015) Secoviridae: A Family of Plant Picorna‐Like Viruses with Monopartite or Bipartite Genomes. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0000764.pub3]