Axon Guidance at the Midline

Abstract

Much has been learnt about how axons are guided along their appropriate paths by studying axon growth at the midline of the central nervous system in a number of model systems. The specialized midline cells produce both attractive and repellent short‐ and long‐range signals and the axons express specific receptors that are dynamically regulated. It has become clear from these studies that the molecular mechanisms used to guide axons have been highly conserved during evolution.

Keywords: axon guidance; midline; central nervous system; embryo; genes

Figure 1.

Axons within the nerve cord of vertebrates and invertebrates choose whether to cross or not cross the midline. (a) In the vertebrate neural tube, commissural axons (C) cross the floor plate (FP) cells that lie at the ventral midline (yellow shading). Once across the midline these axons turn to join a longitudinal tract (L) on the opposite side and do not recross the midline. The floor plate cells produce a variety of signals to regulate the outgrowth of these axons. (b) In the segmental Drosophila nerve cord, axons make the same decision. The majority of axons are commissural axons (C) and cross the midline in either an anterior (AC) or posterior (PC) commissural axon tract. After crossing the midline these axons also join a longitudinal pathway (L). A smaller population of axons never cross the midline and extend within the longitudinal tracts on one side of the nerve cord. At the midline of the fly nerve cord are a specialized group of cells (yellow shading) that provide many of the same signals as does the floor plate in vertebrates.

Figure 2.

Structures of selected molecules that mediate axon guidance decisions at the midline. A variety of ligands and receptors that are necessary to guide axons at the midline have been identified (as described in the text). These schematics illustrate the types of domains contained within these molecules. (The structures are not drawn to scale.)

Figure 3.

Commissural axons switch their behaviour at the midline. Once across the midline they are no longer attracted to it. This change in axon sensitivity is in part due to changes in the molecular composition of the axon surface. (a) Drosophila axons that do not cross the midline continually express Robo and are sensitive to the midline repellent Slit. In commissural axons Comm prevents Robo from reaching the cell surface prior to crossing. Comm activity is reduced in these axons after crossing and Robo surface levels increase. (b) Vertebrate commissural axons switch cell surface antigens after midline crossing. Rodent commissural axons initially express TAG‐1 but then switch to express L1 once across the midline. (c) Vertebrate commissural axons also become sensitive to the repellent midline signals Slit, Sema3 and ephrin‐B after midline crossing. The increase in ephrin sensitivity is due to a local activation of Eph receptor translation in the crossed axons. Eph receptor activity not only drives these axons away from the midline but also dictates where they turn into a longitudinal tract. A lateral patch of ephrin expression prevents axons continuing too far dorsally and directs them to turn longitudinally.

Figure 4.

The Rac/Rho/Cdc42 GTPases have a central role in coupling axon guidance signals to changes in the actin cytoskeleton. In their active GTP‐bound state the GTPases promote actin reorganization. Activation of Rac and Cdc42 promotes axon extension, while activation of Rho stimulates stress fibre formation and prevents outgrowth. Thus signals promoting outgrowth increase the activity of Rac and Cdc42, while repellent signals increase Rho activity. The guidance receptors active at the central nervous system midline regulate the GTPases either through direct interactions, as proposed for the plexins, or by regulating the activity of guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) or GTPase‐activating proteins (GAPs) that promote or inhibit, respectively, formation of the active GTP‐bound state. Ephexin and RhoGEF stimulate Rho activity while the srGAPs reduce Cdc42 activity. The GTPases control the state of the actin cytoskeleton through a number of effector molecules, including PAK, MLCK and ROCK. The Robo receptor also acts on the actin cytoskeleton via its ability to regulate Enabled (Ena). This activity is modulated by the Abelson tyrosine kinase (Abl).

close

References

Bonkowsky JL, Yoshikawa S, O'Keefe DD, Scully AL and Thomas JB (1999) Axon routing across the midline controlled by the Drosophila Derailed receptor. Nature 402: 540–544.

Brittis PA, Lu Q and Flanagan JG (2002) Axonal protein synthesis provides a mechanism for localized regulation at an intermediate target. Cell 110: 223–235.

Brose K and Tessier‐Lavigne M (2000) Slit proteins: key regulators of axon guidance axonal branching, and cell migration. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 10: 95–102.

Dickson BJ (2001) Rho GTPases in growth cone guidance. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 11: 103–110.

Dodd J, Morton SB, Karagogeos D, Yamamoto M and Jessell TM (1988) Spatial regulation of axonal glycoprotein expression on subsets of embryonic spinal neurons. Neuron 1: 105–116.

Guthrie S (1997) Axon guidance: netrin receptors are revealed. Current Biology 7: R6–9.

Hedgecock EM, Culotti JG and Hall DH (1990) The unc‐5, unc‐6, and unc‐40 genes guide circumferential migrations of pioneer axons and mesodermal cells on the epidermis in C. elegans. Neuron 4: 61–85.

Hong K, Hinck L, Nishiyama M et al. (1999) A ligand‐gated association between cytoplasmic domains of UNC5 and DCC family receptors converts netrin‐induced growth cone attraction to repulsion. Cell 97: 927–941.

Hummel T, Schimmelpfeng K and Klambt C (1999) Commissure formation in the embryonic CNS of Drosophila. Developmental Biology 209: 381–398.

Imondi R, Wideman C and Kaprielian Z (2000) Complementary expression of transmembrane ephrins and their receptors in the mouse spinal cord: a possible role in constraining the orientation of longitudinally projecting axons. Development 127: 1397–1410.

Kidd T, Brose K, Mitchell KJ et al. (1998a) Roundabout controls axon crossing of the CNS midline and defines a novel subfamily of evolutionarily conserved guidance receptors. Cell 92: 205–215.

Kidd T, Russell C, Goodman CS and Tear G (1998b) Dosage‐sensitive and complementary functions of roundabout and commissureless control axon crossing of the CNS midline. Neuron 20: 25–33.

Myers PZ and Bastiani MJ (1993) Cell–cell interactions during the migration of an identified commissural growth cone in the embryonic grasshopper. Journal of Neuroscience 13: 115–126.

Plump AS, Erskine L, Sabatier C et al. (2002) Slit1 and Slit2 cooperate to prevent premature midline crossing of retinal axons in the mouse visual system. Neuron 33: 219–232.

Rosenzweig M and Garrity P (2002) Axon targeting meets protein trafficking: Comm takes Robo to the cleaners. Developmental Cell 3: 301–302.

Serafini T, Kennedy TE, Galko MJ et al. (1994) The netrins define a family of axon outgrowth‐promoting proteins homologous to C‐Elegans Unc‐6. Cell 78: 409–424.

Stoeckli ET and Landmesser LT (1995) Axonin‐1, Nr‐Cam, and Ng‐Cam play different roles in the in‐vivo guidance of chick commissural neurons. Neuron 14: 1165–1179.

Sun Q, Bahri S, Schmid A, Chia W and Zinn K (2000) Receptor tyrosine phosphatases regulate axon guidance across the midline of the Drosophila embryo. Development 127: 801–812.

Tanaka E and Sabry J (1995) Making the connection: cytoskeletal rearrangements during growth cone guidance. Cell 83: 171–176.

Tear G (2001) A new code for axons. Nature 409: 472–473.

Tessier‐Lavigne M and Goodman CS (1996) The molecular biology of axon guidance. Science 274: 1123–1133.

Xian J, Clark KJ, Fordham R et al. (2001) Inadequate lung development and bronchial hyperplasia in mice with a targeted deletion in the Dutt1/Robo1 gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 98: 15062–15066.

Zou Y, Stoeckli E, Chen H and Tessier‐Lavigne M (2000) Squeezing axons out of the gray matter: a role for slit and semaphorin proteins from midline and ventral spinal cord. Cell 102: 363–375.

Further Reading

Brown M, Keynes R and Lumsden A (2001) Growth and guidance of axons and dendrites. In: The Developing Brain, pp 218–260. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Grunwald IC and Klein R (2002) Axon guidance: receptor complexes and signalling mechanisms. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 12: 250–259.

Kaprielian Z, Runko E and Imondi R (2001) Axon guidance at the midline choice point. Developmental Dynamics 221: 154–181.

Mueller BK (1999) Growth cone guidance: first steps towards a deeper understanding. Annual Review of Neuroscience 22: 351–388.

Patel BN and van Vactor DL (2002) Axon guidance: the cytoplasmic tail. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 14: 221–229.

Rusch J and van Vactor D (2000) New roundabouts send axons into the Fas lane. Neuron 28: 637–640.

Song H and Poo M‐M (2001) The cell biology of neuronal navigation. Nature Cell Biology 3: E81–E88.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Tear, Guy, and Georgiou, Marios(Jul 2003) Axon Guidance at the Midline. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1038/npg.els.0000828]