Somatic Hypermutation in Antibody Evolution

Abstract

Somatic hypermutation (SHM) of immunoglobulin (Ig) genes is a major mechanism for amplifying the antibody repertoire of vertebrates. SHM results in high frequencies of point mutations in the variable region of Ig genes, the region encoding the antigen‐binding domain of antibodies. The constant region is spared, ensuring conservation of the biological functions of antibodies. We briefly review the biology of SHM and its molecular hallmarks. We discuss what is known and what remains to be investigated of the molecular process that creates the mutations, including the properties, normal and aberrant functions of the activation induced deoxy‐cytidine deaminase, AID, the enzyme that initiates SHM.

Keywords: immunoglobulin genes; antibodies; activation‐induced cytidine deaminase; hypermutation

Figure 1.

(a) The schematic shows the murine immunoglobulin (Ig) heavy chain locus before (top) and after (bottom) somatic hypermutation (SHM) and class switch recombination (CSR). Locations of mRNA transcripts encoding the entire heavy chain (V, variable and C, constant exons), and noncoding switch (S)‐region transcripts that are required for switch recombination, are shown as arrows beneath the top locus. SHM introduces point mutations (asterisks) into the VDJ‐rearranged exon that encodes the Ig V region – the region of the encoded antibody that defines the antigen specificity. CSR is a region‐specific recombination event in which a deletion between two S regions occurs. The deletion results in the fusion of a new Ig C‐region isotype to the V region. (b) A model for the mechanism of SHM. Activation‐induced cytosine deaminase (AID) phosphorylation by PKA prompts interaction with the single‐stranded binding protein RPA. AID complexed with RPA deaminates cytosine bases in double‐stranded DNA (dsDNA), with a preference for cytosines in the hotpsot sequence AGC/GCT (corresponding to the WRC/GYW motif). Cytosine deamination creates a U–G mispair. Left unrepaired, replication (1) would cause a C/G to T/A mutation. Alternatively, removal of the U by Ung leaves an abasic site (dash) that is uninformative for DNA synthesis by a replication polymerase or translesion polymerase, thereby creating mutations to any possible base at the position of the original deaminated cytosine, and potentially neighbouring bases by a translesion polymerase (2). If the abasic site is processed to a nick (by enzymes such as AP endonuclease, AP endo), and then to a single base pair gap, translesion polymerases could fill‐in the single base pair gap or extend the gap for several nucleotides and copy the opposite strand with one or more mismatched nucleotides to generate one or more mutations (3). The mismatch repair protein Msh2/6 may also bind the U–G mismatch. Following Msh2/6 recognition of the mismatch, other mismatch repair factors (not shown) catalyse removal of one strand; the strand harbouring a nearby nick, which in this case could be either strand, will be removed. In pathway 4, the G‐containing strand is removed, leaving a U in single‐stranded DNA that is efficiently removed by Ung. Mutations therefore can arise by DNA synthesis using the uninformative abasic site as a template, and/or by gap‐filling by translesion polymerase(s). In pathway 5, the U‐containing strand is removed, and mutations also could arise by gap‐filling using translesion polymerase. REV1, a dCMP transferase, inserts a cytosine opposite abasic sites. Thus, REV1 can act in pathways 2 and 4 to generate C to G mutations at the original base deaminated by AID (6).

close

References

Basu U, Chaudhuri J, Phan RT, Datta A and Alt FW (2007) Regulation of activation induced deaminase via phosphorylation. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 596: 129–137.

Brink R (2007) Germinal‐center B cells in the zone. Immunity 26: 552–554.

Casali P, Pal Z, Xu Z and Zan H (2006) DNA repair in antibody somatic hypermutation. Trends in Immunology 27: 313–321.

Durandy A, Taubenheim N, Peron S and Fischer A (2007) Pathophysiology of B‐cell intrinsic immunoglobulin class switch recombination deficiencies. Advances in Immunology 94: 275–306.

Longerich S, Basu U, Alt F and Storb U (2006) AID in somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination. Current Opinion in Immunology 16: 164–174.

Michael N, Shen H, Longerich S et al. (2003) The E box motif CAGGTG enhances somatic hypermutation without enhancing transcription. Immunity 19: 235–242.

Muramatsu M, Kinoshita K, Fagarasan S et al. (2000) Class switch recombination and somatic hypermutation require activation‐induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a potential RNA editing enzyme. Cell 102: 553–563.

Okazaki IM, Kotani A and Honjo T (2007) Role of AID in tumorigenesis. Advances in Immunology 94: 245–273.

Peters A and Storb U (1996) Somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin genes is linked to transcription initiation. Immunity 4: 57–65.

Ramiro A, San‐Martin BR, McBride K et al. (2007) The role of activation‐induced deaminase in antibody diversification and chromosome translocations. Advances in Immunology 94: 75–107.

Shen HM, Ratnam S and Storb U (2005) Targeting of the activation‐induced cytosine deaminase is strongly influenced by the sequence and structure of the targeted DNA. Molecular and Cellular Biology 25: 10815–10821.

Yang SY and Schatz DG (2007) Targeting of AID‐mediated sequence diversification by cis‐acting determinants. Advances in Immunology 94: 109–125.

Further Reading

Berek C, Berger A and Apel M (1991) Maturation of the immune response in germinal centers. Cell 67: 1121–1129.

Bransteitter R, Pham P, Calabrese P and Goodman MF (2004) Biochemical analysis of hypermutational targeting by wild type and mutant activation‐induced cytidine deaminase. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 279: 51612–51621.

Gonzales‐Fernandes A and Milstein C (1993) Analysis of somatic hypermutation in mouse Peyer's patches using immunoglobulin κ light‐chain transgenes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 90: 9862–9866.

Jansen JG, Langerak P, Tsaalbi‐Shtylik A et al. (2006) Strand‐biased defect in C/G transversions in hypermutating immunoglobulin genes in Rev1‐deficient mice. The Journal of Experimental Medicine 203(2): 319–323.

Longerich S, Meira L, Shah D, Samson L and Storb U (2007) Alkyladenine DNA glycosylase (Aag) in somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination. DNA Repair 6: 1764–1773.

Michael N, Martin T, Nicolae D et al. (2002) Effects of sequence and structure on the hypermutability of immunoglobulin genes. Immunity 16: 123–134.

Shen H, Peters A, Baron B, Zhu X and Storb U (1998) Mutation of BCL‐6 gene in normal B cells by the process of somatic hypermutation of Ig genes. Science 280: 1750–1752.

Shen HM, Tanaka A, Bozek G, Nicolae D and Storb U (2006) Somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination in Msh6(−/−)Ung(−/−) double‐knockout mice. Journal of Immunology 177: 5386–5392.

Winter D, Sattar N, Mai J‐J and Gearhart P (1997) Insertion of 2 kb of bacteriophage DNA between an immunoglobulin promoter and leader exon stops somatic hypermutation in a kappa transgene. Molecular Immunology 43: 359–366.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Longerich, Simonne, and Storb, Ursula(Jul 2008) Somatic Hypermutation in Antibody Evolution. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0000842.pub2]