Immunological Adhesion and Homing Molecules

Abstract

Leucocytes must interact with other cells and extracellular matrix molecules to migrate from the bloodstream to lymphoid and nonlymphoid tissues, to detect and respond to antigen and to exert immune functions. Adhesion and homing molecules on the surface of leucocytes and interacting cells provide mechanical stability and contribute to the specificity of such interactions.

Keywords: integrins; selectins; vascular addressins; immunoglobulin superfamily

Figure 1.

Schematic representation of lymphocyte homing pathways. In principle, lymphocytes can home from the blood to any tissue in the body (red arrows), but different lymphocyte subsets prefer distinct target organs. Naive lymphocytes and central memory cells home preferentially to secondary lymphoid organs, i.e. lymph nodes (LNs), tonsils, spleen and the organized lymphoid aggregates in the wall of the small intestine called Peyer's patches. B cells are the predominant subset in most mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissues, whereas T cells are more frequent in peripheral LNs. Effector memory cells migrate preferentially to nonlymphoid tissues. Extravascular lymphocytes return to the blood via the lymphatic system (blue arrows) or when they reside in the spleen, enter the bloodstream directly. Ag, antigen.

Figure 2.

Leucocyte behaviour in the microcirculation. Leucocytes enter the microvasculature via arterioles with diameters ranging from 15 to 100 μm(1). Many capillaries (5–10 μm diameter) are narrower than the average diameter of a leucocyte (6–10 μm). Thus, the relatively stiff leucocytes must deform before they can enter the capillary ostium (2). During their passage through the narrow capillary, red blood cells (RBCs) pile up behind the slow‐moving leucocytes (3). Upon entry into postcapillary venules (diameter 10–100 μm), the RBCs pass the slow‐moving cells. Collisions with RBCs force leucocytes toward the margin of the bloodstream, allowing the cells’ microvilli to touch the vessel wall (4). If the venular endothelial cells express appropriate ligands for microvillus‐associated adhesion receptors, leucocytes become tethered and roll slowly downstream (5). The rolling cells are pushed further against the vascular wall by the flowing blood. This allows contact of additional adhesion molecules on the planar cell body with the endothelial surface. In the presence of an appropriate activating stimulus, these molecules bind more strongly and arrest the cell (6). Subsequently, the stuck cell begins to spread and extends a pseudopodium through the endothelial barrier (7). Eventually, adherent leucocytes emigrate and enter the extravascular compartment. In most organs, adhesion is supported only by endothelial cells in venules (broken lines indicate the capillary–venular border) but not in arterioles or capillaries. This spatial distinction may have evolved from the need to preserve tissue perfusion. The temporary reduction in vessel diameter associated with leucocyte adhesion causes a concomitant increase in vascular resistance. As arterioles are the main resistance vessels of the body, leucocyte adhesion in arterioles could affect organ perfusion significantly. Similarly, leucocyte adhesion in a capillary would result in complete luminal occlusion until the cell has diapedesed through the endothelial lining. The contribution of venules to the overall resistance of a microvascular bed is very small. Thus, the haemodynamic effects of leucocyte recruitment in venules are negligible. (Note: Most RBCs were omitted from this drawing for clarity; the physiological ratio of RBCs leucocytes is about 1000:1.)

Figure 3.

The multistep adhesion cascade. Frequent collisions occur between blood cells that move at different relative positions within a vessel, because cells move faster in the centreline of microvessels and slower at the vessel wall (arrows on left indicate a typical laminar flow profile). Collisions with RBCs facilitate leucocyte contact with endothelial cells. When leucocyte microvilli touch the endothelium, several different adhesion pathways can function either alone or in concert to mediate tethering. As soon as adhesive contact has been initiated, the tethered cells begin to roll slowly downstream. The adhesion molecules that mediate tethering and rolling are largely the same, but tethering is greatly facilitated by leucocyte receptors, which occur at high density on the tips of microvilli, whereas subsequent rolling is not influenced by the topography of adhesion receptors. When a rolling cell encounters a chemoattractant stimulus such as a chemokine, the activating signal induces rapid activation of β2 or α4 integrins, which bind to endothelial immunoglobulin superfamily members. The engagement of L‐selectin with its endothelial ligand, peripheral lymph node addressin (PNAd), can also trigger intracellular signalling events that may contribute to integrin activation. The subsequent step, transmigration, is the least understood event in the cascade. Some immunoglobulin superfamily members as well as α4 and β2 integrins have been suggested to play a role in this process. CD, cluster of differentiation; ESL, E‐selectin ligand; ICAM, intercellular adhesion molecule; JAM, junctional adhesion molecule; LFA, leucocyte functional antigen; LT, leucotriene; MAdCAM, mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule; Mac, macrophage antigen; PAF, platelet‐activating factor; PECAM, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule; PSGL, P‐selectin glycoprotein ligand; VAP, vascular adhesion protein; VCAM, vascular cell adhesion molecule.

Figure 4.

The major primary adhesion pathways. All the leucocyte‐expressed primary adhesion molecules shown here are clustered on the tips of microvilli. They are thus strategically positioned to mediate rapid tethering. Primary adhesion molecules are constitutively active, i.e. they bind to their counterreceptors without the need for previous stimulation. Most primary interactions occur directly between leucocytes and endothelial cells. In addition, L‐selectin can also bind to P‐selectin glycoprotein ligand 1 (PSGL‐1) on the surface of other leucocytes (broken arrow). This interaction may be relevant when large numbers of adherent cells have accumulated in a vessel. These cells are effectively part of the vessel wall and may contribute to the recruitment of additional leucocytes via the L‐selectin–PSGL‐1 pathway (PSGL‐1 requires sulfation of at least one of three tyrosine residues (sulfation sites are identified by ‘S’) to interact efficiently with P‐ and L‐selectin, whereas E‐selectin binding is sulfation independent). MAdCAM, mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule. PNAd, peripheral lymph node addressin. PSGL, P‐selectin glycoprotein ligand. S, sulfate. SGP200, sialylated glycoprotein. sLeX, sialyl‐LewisX. VCAM, vascular cell adhesion molecule.

Figure 5.

The major secondary adhesion pathways. Leucocyte activation is necessary for binding of the β2 integrins to their immunoglobulin ligands, intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM‐1) and ICAM‐2. Enhanced binding activity is also required for the α4 integrins, α4β1 and α4β7, to mediate firm arrest on vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM‐1) and mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule 1 (MAdCAM‐1), respectively. LFA, leucocyte functional antigen; Mac, macrophage antigen.

Figure 6.

The selectins. Each selectin has a C‐type (Ca2+ dependent) lectin domain at the N‐terminus. This domain contains the recognition site for selectin ligands. The epithelial growth factor (EGF)‐like domain is required for optimal lectin function in P‐selectin. The short consensus repeats (SCRs) are thought to function as modular spacers to elevate the lectin domain above the cell surface. The membrane‐proximal region of L‐selectin contains a cleavage site for a metalloprotease, which rapidly removes L‐selectin from the cell surface when leucocytes become activated.

Figure 7.

Biosynthesis of LewisX (LeX) and sialyl‐LewisX (sLeX). Both carbohydrates are expressed abundantly on myeloid cells. Expression of sLeX is upregulated on many activated and memory lymphocytes, particularly on T‐helper 1 cells, due to transcriptional induction of the α1,3‐fucosyltransferase (FucT)‐VII. The enzymatic steps that lead to Core 1 or 2 O‐glycan synthesis (by core 1 or 2 β1,6‐N‐acetylglucosaminyltransferase) and α1,3‐fucosylation of core 1 or 2 branches, which consist of one or more lactosamines, are necessary for selectin ligands expressed on leucocytes. FucT‐VII is also required for the expression of peripheral lymph node addressin (PNAd) in high endothelial venules. The major product of FucT‐IV is LeX, which is not a selectin ligand. When the supply of Core 2 O‐glycan (or perhaps α2,3‐sialyl transferase or sialic acid) is limited, FucT‐IV competes with FucT‐VII for the shared substrate and, thus, can reduce the biosynthesis of selectin ligands. FucT‐IV can also fucosylate sialylated core 2 glycans and produce a small amount of sLeX. Sialylated glycans may be further modified, for example by sulfotransferase(s), which add a sulfate (SO4) moiety to the 6’ or 6 position of galactose or N‐acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc), respectively. These modifications have been identified in GlyCAM, a sialomucin that is decorated with the MECA 79 epitope. Sulfation of PNAd is critical for L‐selectin binding.

Figure 8.

Selected leucocyte‐expressed integrins and their ligands. Each of the integrins shown has been implicated in leucocyte homing, but so far only the adhesion pathways indicated by thick lines have been proved to be important in this context. Ligands expressed on the luminal surface of endothelial cells are highlighted by black frames ICAM, intercellular adhesion molecule; LFA, leucocyte functional antigen; Mac, macrophage antigen; MAdCAM, mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule; VCAM, vascular cell adhesion molecule; VLA, very late antigen.

close

References

von Andrian UH, Chambers JD, McEvoy LM et al. (1991) Two‐step model of leucocyte–endothelial cell interaction in inflammation: distinct roles for LECAM‐1 and the leucocyte β2 integrins in vivo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 88: 7538–7542.

Bargatze RF, Jutila MA and Butcher EC (1995) Distinct roles of L‐selectin and integrins α4β7 and LFA‐1 in lymphocyte homing to Peyer's patch‐HEV in situ: the multistep model confirmed and refined. Immunity 3: 99–108.

Butcher EC and Picker LJ (1996) Lymphocyte homing and homeostasis. Science 272: 60–66.

Etzioni A, Doerschuk CM and Harlan JM (1999) Of man and mouse: leucocyte and endothelial adhesion molecule deficiencies. Blood 94: 3281–3288.

Gallatin WM, Weissman IL and Butcher EC (1983) A cell‐surface molecule involved in organ‐specific homing of lymphocytes. Nature 304: 30–34.

Gowans JL and Knight EJ (1964) The route of re‐circulation of lymphocytes in the rat. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 159: 257–282.

Lawrence MB and Springer TA (1991) Leucocytes roll on a selectin at physiologic flow rates: distinction from and prerequisite for adhesion through integrins. Cell 65: 859–873.

Mackay CR, Marston WL and Dudler L (1990) Naive and memory T cells show distinct pathways of lymphocyte recirculation. Journal of Experimental Medicine 171: 801–817.

Takagi J and Springer T (2002) Integrin activation and structural rearrangement. Immunological Reviews 186: 141–163.

Warnock RA, Askari S, Butcher EC and von Andrian UH (1998) Molecular mechanisms of lymphocyte homing to peripheral lymph nodes. Journal of Experimental Medicine 187: 205–216.

Further Reading

Butcher EC (1991) Leucocyte–endothelial cell recognition: three (or more) steps to specificity and diversity. Cell 67: 1033–1036.

Girard J‐P and Springer TA (1995) High endothelial venules (HEVs): specialized endothelium for lymphocyte migration. Immunology Today 16: 449–457.

Hynes RO (2002) Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell 110(6): 673–687.

Luster AD (1998) Chemokines – chemotactic cytokines that mediate inflammation. New England Journal of Medicine 338: 436–445.

Muller WA (2003) Leukocyte–endothelial cell interactions in leukocyte transmigration and the inflammatory response. Trends in Immunology 24: 326–333.

Salmi M and Jalkanen S (1997) How do lymphocytes know where to go: current concepts and enigmas of lymphocyte homing. Advances in Immunology 64: 139–218.

Springer TA (1990) Adhesion receptors of the immune system. Nature 346: 425–433.

Springer TA (1994) Traffic signals for lymphocyte recirculation and leukocyte emigration: the multi‐step paradigm. Cell 76: 301–314.

Vestweber D and Blanks JE (1999) Mechanisms that regulate the function of the selectins and their ligands. Physiology Reviews 79: 181–213.

von Andrian UH and Mackay CR (2000) T cell function and migration. Two sides of the same coin. New England Journal of Medicine 343: 1020–1034.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Lucila, Scimone M, and von Andrian, Ulrich H(Sep 2005) Immunological Adhesion and Homing Molecules. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1038/npg.els.0003990]