Mucosal Surfaces: Immunological Protection

The mucosal immune system serves to protect its host from a variety of pathogens while simultaneously allowing for tolerance under normal circumstances to prevent inflammatory disease.

Keywords: mucosal immunology; common mucosal immune system; tolerance; regulatory T cells; TH1/TH2

Figure 1. Secretory IgA (sIgA). Dimeric IgA (IgA2) is the predominant form present along mucosal surfaces and is formed by two IgA monomer subunits attached together by the J chain. sIgA is noncovalently bound to polymeric immunoglobulin receptor (pIgR) derived secretory component to protect it from digestion by luminal proteases.
Figure 2. Polymeric immunoglobulin receptor (pIgR) transport. pIgR binds to IgA (or IgM) on the basolateral surface of the epithelial cell and this complex then undergoes transcytosis. pIgR is then cleaved at the apical surface, forming secretory component (SC) bound IgA that enters the lumen. The remaining portion of the pIgR is nonfunctional and undergoes intracellular degradation. SC protects sIgA and sIgM from luminal degradation.
Figure 3. gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT). Peyer's patches (PP) and mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs) are the major inductive sites present in GALT. The PP contains three distinct divisions: the subepithelial dome (SED) populated by lymphocytes and DC, distinct B cell-containing follicles organized into germinal centres, and parafollicular zones containing T cells and high endothelial venules (HEV). Overlying the dome is the FAE-containing M cells whose numerous microfolds and large invaginated subdomains increase the surface area of antigen sampling, (IEC, intestinal epithelial cell).
Figure 4. Antigen presentation by IECs. Antigen is sampled in the lumen and subsequently transported to the basolateral surface where it binds to the restriction element CD1d. Together with CEA, CD1d presents the antigen to CD8+ T cells to induce the activation and proliferation of a subset of regulatory T cells (TRE cells). These cells are phenotypically characterized by the expression of CD101 and CD103 and lack of CD28. IECs do not express the conventional co-stimulatory molecules CD80 or CD86, and instead utilize B7 h and B7H1.
Figure 5. TH1 and TH2 cytokine regulation. (a) In TH1 cells, IL-12 activates STAT4, which will induce production of IFN and the IL-12 receptor. Upon binding of IL-12 to this receptor, STAT4 is activated and IFN produced. Overexpression of T-bet could potentially contribute to TH1-mediated mucosal diseases such as Crohn disease. (b) In TH2 cells, IL-4 induces cytokine production via activation of STAT6 followed by activation of the master transcription factor GATA-3. Overexpression of GATA-3 predisposes to TH2-mediated mucosal diseases such as asthma.
close
 References
    book Challacombe SJ and Shirlaw PJ (1999) "Immunology of diseases of the oral cavity". In: Ogra PL, Mestecky J, Lamm ME et al. (eds) Mucosal Immunology, pp. 1313–1337. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
    book Cone RA (1999) "Mucous". In: Ogra PL, Mestecky J, Lamm ME et al. (eds) Mucosal Immunology, pp. 43–64. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
    Hayday A, Theodoridis E, Ramsburg E and Shires J (2001) Intraepithelial lymphocytes: exploring the Third Way in immunology. Nature Immunology 2: 997–1003.
    book McGhee JR, Lamm ME and Strober W (1999) "Mucosal immune responses, an overview". In: Ogra PL, Mestecky J, Lamm ME et al. (eds) Mucosal Immunology, pp. 485–506. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
    McLachlan JB, Hart JP and Pizzo SV (2003) Mast cell-derived tumor necrosis factor induces hypertrophy of draining lymph nodes during infection. Nature Immunology 4: 1199–1205.
    Mayer L (2003) Mucosal immunity. Pediatrics 111: 1595–1600.
    book Mayer L and Blumberg RS (1999) "Mucosal immune responses, an overview". In: Ogra PL, Mestecky J, Lamm ME et al. (eds) Mucosal Immunology, pp. 365–379. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
    Neurath MF, Finotto S and Glimcher LH (2002) The role of Th1/Th2 polarization in mucosal immunity. Nature Medicine 8: 567–573.
    Neutra MR, Mantis NJ and Kraehenbuhl J (2001) Collaboration of epithelial cells with organized mucosal lymphoid tissues. Nature Immunology 2: 1004–1009.
    Podolsky DL (1999) Mucosal immunity and inflammation V. Innate mechanisms of mucosal defense and repair: the best offense is a good defense. American Journal of Physiology 277: G495–G499.
 Further Reading
    Fagarason S and Honjo T (2003) Intestinal IgA synthesis: regulation of front-line body defences. Nature Reviews Immunology 3: 63–72.
    Mowat AM (2003) Anatomical basis of tolerance and immunity to intestinal antigens. Nature Reviews Immunology 3: 331–341.
    Nagler-Anderson C (2001) Man the barrier! Strategic defences in the intestinal mucosa. Nature Reviews Immunology 1: 59–67.
    Rescigno M, Urbano M, Valzasina B et al. (2001) Dendritic cells express tight junction proteins and penetrate gut epithelial monolayers to sample bacteria. Nature Immunology 2: 361–367.
    von Adrian UH and Mackay CR (2000) T-cell fuction and migration – two sides of the same coin. New England Journal of Medicine 343: 1020–1034.
Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Ponda, Prashant P, and Mayer, Lloyd(Jan 2006) Mucosal Surfaces: Immunological Protection. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1038/npg.els.0000942]