Two-hybrid and Related Systems

The two-hybrid system is a yeast-based genetic method to detect and analyse protein–protein interactions. Related systems have been developed to detect DNA–protein, RNA–protein and small molecule–protein interactions.

Keywords: protein–protein interaction; DNA–protein interaction; RNA–protein interaction; yeast; transcription factor

Figure 1. The two-hybrid system. (a) A transcriptional activator may contain a DNA-binding domain (filled circle) and a transcription activation domain (filled rectangle). (b) A hybrid protein composed of a DNA-binding domain and a protein ‘X’ does not activate transcription if X does not have an activation domain. (c) A hybrid protein composed of an activation domain and a protein ‘Y’ does not activate transcription because it does not bind to the DNA-binding sites. (d) Interaction between X and Y reconstitutes the function of the activator and leads to expression of the reporter gene.
Figure 2. The three-hybrid system to detect RNA–protein interactions. A hybrid protein of the LexA protein fused to the bacteriophage MS2 coat protein localizes to the regulatory region of the reporter gene by binding to the LexA-binding sites. A hybrid protein of the Gal4 transcription activation domain fused to a second RNA-binding protein will activate transcription of the reporter gene when in close proximity to the gene's regulatory region. A hybrid RNA containing cognate binding sites for the coat protein and the other RNA-binding protein bridges the two hybrid proteins and results in expression of the reporter gene.
Figure 3. The three-hybrid system to detect the interaction of a protein with a small molecule. A hybrid protein of a DNA-binding domain with a protein domain that binds to ligand A, and a hybrid protein of an activation domain with a protein domain that binds to ligand B, are bridged by a heterodimer of A linked to B.
close
 References
    Aronheim A, Zandi E, Hennemann H, Elledge SJ and Karin M (1997) Isolation of an AP-1 repressor by a novel method for detecting protein–protein interactions. Molecular and Cellular Biology 17: 3094–3102.
    Belshaw PJ, Ho SN, Crabtree GR and Schreiber SL (1996) Controlling protein association and subcellular localization with a synthetic ligand that induces heterodimerization of proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 93: 4604–4607.
    Chiu MI, Katz H and Berlin V (1994) RAPT1, a mammalian homolog of yeast TOR, interacts with the FKBP12/rapamycin complex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 91: 12574–12578.
    Colas P, Cohen B, Jessen T et al. (1996) Genetic selection of peptide aptamers that recognize and inhibit cyclin-dependent kinase 2. Nature 380: 548–550.
    Fields S and Song O (1989) A novel genetic system to detect protein–protein interactions. Nature 340: 245–246.
    Inouye C, Dhillon N, Durfee T, Zambryski PC and Thorner J (1997) Mutational analysis of STE5 in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: application of a differential interaction trap assay for examining protein–protein interactions. Genetics 147: 479–492.
    Johnsson N and Varshavsky A (1994) A split ubiquitin as a sensor of protein interactions in vivo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 94: 10340–10344.
    Licitra EJ and Liu JQ (1996) A three-hybrid system for detecting small ligand–protein receptor interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 93: 12817–12821.
    Miyawaki A, Llopis J, Heim R et al. (1997) Fluorescent indicators for Ca2+ based on green fluorescent proteins and calmodulin. Nature 388: 882–887.
    Osborne MA, Dalton S and Kochan JP (1995) The yeast tribrid system – genetic detection of trans-phosphorylated ITAM-SH2-interactions. Bio/Technology 13: 1474–1478.
    Rossi F, Charlton CA and Blau HM (1997) Monitoring protein–protein interactions in intact eukaryotic cells by -galactosidase complementation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 94: 8405–8410.
    SenGupta DJ, Zhang B, Kraemer B et al. (1996) A three-hybrid system to detect RNA–protein interactions in vivo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 93: 8496–8501.
    Shih H, Goldman PS, DeMaggio AJ et al. (1996) A positive genetic selection for disrupting protein–protein interactions: identification of CREB mutations that prevent association with the coactivator CBP. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 93: 13896–13901.
    Vidal M, Brachmann RK, Fattaey A, Harlow E and Boeke JD (1996) Reverse two-hybrid and one-hybrid systems to detect dissociation of protein–protein and protein– DNA interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 93: 10315–10326.
    Wang MM and Reed RR (1993) Molecular cloning of the olfactory neuronal transcription factor Olf-1 by genetic selection in yeast. Nature 364: 121–126.
    Yang M, Wu Z and Fields S (1995) Protein–peptide interactions analysed with the yeast two-hybrid system. Nucleic Acids Research 23: 1152–1156.
 Further Reading
    book Bartel PL and Fields S (eds) (1997) The Yeast Two-Hybrid System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Brachman RK and Boeke JD (1997) Tag games in yeast: the two-hybrid system and beyond. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 8: 561–568.
    Brent R and Finley RL Jr (1997) Understanding gene and allele function with two-hybrid methods. Annual Review of Genetics 31: 663–704.
    Frederickson RM (1998) Macromolecular matchmaking: advances in two-hybrid and related technologies. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 9: 90–96.
    McNabb DS and Guarente L (1996) Genetic and biochemical probes for protein–protein interactions. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 7: 554–559.
Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Fields, Stanley(Apr 2001) Two-hybrid and Related Systems. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1038/npg.els.0000981]