Knockout and Knock‐in Animals

Abstract

The inactivation of a gene (knockout) or the insertion of a coding sequence into a gene of interest (knock‐in) provides genetically modified animals for the analysis of genetic circuits in developmental biology and for use as models for human disease.

Keywords: transgenic mouse; embryonic stem cells; knockout; knock‐in animals; homologous recombination

Figure 1.

Knock‐in targeting constructs. To illustrate the knock‐in strategy, the genomic organization of a mammalian gene with four exons is shown in (a); (b)–(e) represent different constructs in order to perform a knock‐in of a marker such as LacZ (b) or of any other cDNA of interest (gene X in (e)) into the locus (a); (b)–(d) illustrate the steps that are required to achieve a knock‐in experiment (shown for LacZ). The first exon containing the ATG is deleted and replaced by a DNA fragment consisting of LacZ and neo (b). LacZ contains promoterless coding sequences including ATG and a polyadenylation site. The neo is inserted just behind the LacZ and the PGK promoter drives its expression. In a first electroporation experiment, the targeting construct (b) is introduced into wild‐type ES cells. Homologous recombination events generate ES clones that carry a knock‐in allele, as shown in (c). A transient expression of the Cre recombinase (also driven by the PGK promoter) in these ES clones to remove neo is achieved through a second electroporation. The genomic structure of the final knock‐in allele is shown in (d) for LacZ or any other cDNA in (e). LacZ or gene X is then expressed under regulatory sequences of the locus (a). (f) represents a targeting construct for the generation of a floxed allele by using the Frt sites (F) to delete the selection marker. The neo gene is flanked by two Frt sites (in parallel orientation) and carries in addition one LoxP site (arrowhead). The second LoxP site required for the floxed allele is inserted in front of the first exon. The Frt sites allow the excision of the neo gene by crossing mice carrying the mutated allele in (f) to transgenic mice that express the FLP recombinase (Dymecki, ). The FLP recombinase is expressed under a ubiquitous promoter such as Rosa26. After deletion of the neo, the LoxP and one Frt site remain in the locus (g). (g) represents the genomic organization of a floxed allele generated from the gene (a), where LoxP sites are flanking the first exon. Transgenic mice expressing Cre recombinase driven by specific promoters may be used to knock out gene (a) (using the floxed allele) in specific tissues. External 5’ and 3’ probes for the screening of homologous recombination events are indicated in (a). The insertion of LacZ or cDNA (X) can also be designed in such a way that a fusion protein between the endogenous and the inserted gene is created. Any exon may then be used for the creation of the fusion protein. neo, neomycin; β‐gal, β‐galactosidase; PGK, phosphoglycerate kinase; Gene‐X may represent any cDNA to be knocked in the locus. The arrowheads show the LoxP sites that can be recognized by the Cre recombinase to excise the neo gene.

Figure 2.

Mouse preimplantation development. (a) Fertilized oocyte with the male and female pronuclei. (b) and (c) illustrate the two‐ and four‐cell stages, respectively. (d) and (e) show the morula and compacted morula, respectively. (f) A blastocyst, shown in (g) at high magnification to indicate the different cell types: TE is the trophectoderm, which will give rise to extraembryonic tissues, and ICM is the inner cell mass from which the embryo proper is derived. The ICM are the cells giving rise in vitro to ES cells. ZP, zona pellucida. Polar bodies are not shown.

Figure 3.

Insertion of the β‐galactosidase gene into the Pax‐3 locus. Staining for β‐galactosidase activity in whole‐mount embryos from E10.5 of gestation. The β‐galactosidase gene, inserted into the Pax‐3 locus by homologous recombination in ES cells, recapitulates the expression of the Pax‐3 gene in vivo. Pax‐3 is a paired box‐containing gene and a member of the Pax family of transcription factors. The expression is clearly seen in the spinal cord (SC) and in the developing skeletal muscle. (a) A heterozygous embryo. The muscle cells are regular and migration of these cells into the limb buds is occurring normally (arrows). (b) A homozygous embryo reveals LacZ staining in irregular forming muscle precursor cells (black arrows); note that muscle cells are not migrating into the limb buds (white arrow). In the posterior part of the spinal cord, the neural tube is open, leading to spina bifida (Sb). Figure b is taken from Mansouri et al. (2001) Development128: 1995–2005.

close

References

Ahlgren U, Jonsson J, Jonsson L, Simu K and Edlund H (1998) β‐Cell‐specific inactivation of the mouse IPF/Pdx1 gene results in loss of β‐cell phenotype and maturity onset diabetes. Genes and Development 12: 1763–1768.

Capecchi MR (1989) The new mouse genetics: altering the genome by gene targeting. Trends in Genetics 5(3): 70–76.

Carmell MA, Zhang L, Conklin DS, Hannon GJ and Rosenquist TA (2003) Germline transmission of RNAi in mice. Nature Structural Biology 10: 91–92.

Dymecki S (1996) Flp recombinase promotes site‐specific DNA recombination in embryonic stem cells and transgenic mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 93: 6191–6196.

Farley FW, Soriano P, Steffen LS and Dymecki SM (2000) Widespread recombinase expression using FLPeR (flipper) mice. Genesis 3–4: 106–110.

Hasty P, Ramirez‐solis R, Krumlauf R and Bradley A (1991) Introduction of a subtle mutation into the Hox‐2.6 locus in embryonic stem cells. Nature 350: 243–246.

Hemann MT, Fridman JS, Zilfou JT et al. (2003) An epi‐allelic series of p53 hypomorphs created by stable RNAi produces distinct tumor phenotypes in vivo. Nature Genetics 33: 396–400.

Kaul A, Köster M, Neuhaus H and Braun T (2000) Myf‐5 revisited: loss of early myotome formation does not lead to a rib phenotype in homozygous Myf‐5 mutant mice. Cell 102: 17–19.

Kellendonk K, Tronche F, Monaghan A‐P et al. (1996) Regulation of Cre recombinase activity by the synthetic steroid RU 486. Nucleic Acids Research 24: 1404–1411.

Lee KJ, Dietrich P and Jessell TM (2000) Genetic ablation reveals that the roof plate is essential for dorsal interneuron specification. Nature 403: 734–740.

McCreath KJ, Howcroft J, Campbell KHS et al. (2000) Production of gene‐targeted sheep by nuclear transfer from cultured somatic cells. Nature 405: 1066–1069.

McPherron AC, Lawler AM and Lee SJ (1997) Regulation of skeletal muscle mass in mice by a new TGF‐superfamily member. Nature 387: 83–90.

Metcalf D, Greenhalgh CJ, Viney E et al. (2000) Gigantism in mice lacking suppressor of cytokine signalling‐2. Nature 405: 1069–1073.

Metzger D, Clifford J, Chiba H and Chambon P (1995) Conditional site‐specific recombination in mammalian cells using a ligand‐dependent chimeric Cre recombinase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 92: 6991–6995.

Meyers EN, Lewandoski M and Martin GR (1998) An FGF8 mutant allelic series generated by Cre‐ and Flp‐mediated recombination. Nature Genetics 18: 136–141.

Napirei M, Karsunsky H, Zevnik B et al. (2000) Features of systemic lupus erythematosus in Dnase1‐deficient mice. Nature Genetics 25: 177–181.

Sauer B and Henderson N (1993) Manipulating of transgenes by site‐specific recombination: use of Cre recombinase. Methods in Enzymology 225: 890–900.

Trumpp A, Depew MJ, Rubenstein JLR, Bishop JM and Martin GR (1999) Cre‐mediated gene inactivation demonstrates that FGF8 is required for cell survival and patterning of the first branchial arch. Genes and Development 13: 3136–3148.

Further Reading

Lobe CL and Nagy A (1998) Conditional genome alteration in mice. BioEssays 20: 200–208.

Robertson EJ (eds) (1987) Teratocarcinomas and Embryonic Stem Cells: a Practical Approach. Oxford: IRL Press.

Soriano P (1995) Gene targeting in ES cells. Annual Review of Neuroscience 18: 1–18.

Torres RM and Kühn R (eds) (1997) Laboratory Protocols for Conditional Targeting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Mansouri, Ahmed(Sep 2005) Knockout and Knock‐in Animals. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1038/npg.els.0003840]