Mutagenesis: Site‐specific

Site-specific mutagenesis techniques are aimed at the precise substitution, insertion or deletion of any coding sequence in vitro. More recently, however, such precise alterations are also being developed for in vivo gene/genome modifications. These techniques are revolutionizing our understanding of the genetic and molecular mechanisms in several biological systems, which could lead to the development of new enzymes, therapeutics as well as improved agricultural applications.

Keywords: codon optimization; mutation efficiency; N-end rule; synthetic mutations

Figure 1. Mutagenic oligonucleotide design. The blue box represents the target gene. The short arrowhead line represents the oligonucleotide. The cross represents desired mutation. P, phosphate group at 5¢-end of DNA, m, methyl groups. (a, b) Single or nearby multiple mutations can be designed into the middle area of one or a pair of complementary mutagenic oligos, which will lead to the synthesis of the whole plasmid. (c) Mutations at the terminal regions of a gene can be designed into a pair of mutagenic oligos, which will lead to the synthesis of the target gene. (d) Scattered multiple mutations can be designed into a pair of outside mutagenic oligos (a and d) and a pair of middle mutagenic oligos (b and c). Mutations in b and c oligos sit in the flanking areas that cannot anneal with the template but are complementary to each other. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products from oligos a and c and oligos b and d can anneal to each other and be elongated to form dsDNA. Thus, the mutated gene can be generated by a final PCR with oligos a and d. (e) Multiple mutations separated by long distance can be made in one PCR, using one oligo per mutation. All the oligos anneal to the same strand of DNA. The gaps between the oligos are filled and ligated to generate ssDNA. The ssDNA is then converted into dsDNA in vivo in the host cell (see Figure 10 for a more detailed description).
Figure 2. In vitro mutagenesis using dut ung genetic selection method.
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of in vitro mutagenesis procedure using the pALTER®-1 vector as an example (Promega protocol). Target gene was cloned in a plasmid with both tetracycline-resistant gene and point-mutated ampicillin-resistant gene (AmpS). Bacterial cells transformed with the plasmid are tetracycline resistant, but ampicillin sensitive. Mutagenic oligo is made containing the desired mutation for the target gene. Meanwhile, Ampr oligo is made containing the mutation, which can repair the point-mutated ampicillin-resistant gene back to its wild-type coding sequence. Alkaline-denatured plasmid, ssDNA can anneal to both mutagenic and Ampr oligo. The mutant DNA strand can be synthesized with T4 DNA polymerase and T4 DNA ligase. The generated plasmid was first transformed to mismatch-repair-deficient cell ES1301 mutS allowing the formation of double-stranded mutant plasmid that can be selected with ampicillin plates. Purified plasmid DNA from surviving ES1301 mutS was then transformed to JM109 grown on ampicillin plates to select and amplify mutant plasmid.
Figure 4. Thionucleotide selection-based mutagenesis. The blue box represents the target gene. The short arrowhead line represents the mutagenic oligo. The peak arch represents desired mutation. ‘A’ represents restriction endonuclease and its site. The incorporation of a certain type of deoxynucleotide triphosphate S (dNTPS) can prevent A restriction, resulting in a nick in the DNA strand without thionucleotide incorporation.
Figure 5. Unique site elimination-based mutagenesis. The blue box represents the target gene. The short arrowhead line represents the mutagenic oligo (with peak arch) or selection oligo (with square). The peak arch in the blue box represents desired mutation. ‘A’ represents unique restriction endonuclease, and the semicircle on the plasmid represents the sequence for unique restriction enzyme A.
Figure 6. Site-directed mutagenesis method based on the QuikChange method. Two complementary primers with the desired mutation are used in a PCR to synthesize mutated DNA. The parental strands, methylated before PCR by dam+ E. coli host, is digested by DpnI (restriction endonuclease cut at GmeA TC site) and the nicked vector with the mutation was transformed into XLI Blue. The mutation is verified by sequencing.
Figure 7. GeneTailor Site-Directed mutagenesis system. The short arrowhead line represents oligonucleotide, m, methyl group. The DNA is methylated in vitro by DNA methylase. In the following mutagenesis reaction, the DNA is amplified with two overlapping oligonucleotides, one that contains the mutation. The DNA is transformed into DH5™-T1R cells. These cells contain McrBC endonuclease, which digests the methylated parental DNA.
Figure 8. Outline of the mutagenesis strategy at multiple sites. The short arrowed line represents oligonucleotide, m, methyl group; P, phosphate group at 5¢-end of DNA. All the oligos are designed to anneal to the same strand of DNA, one oligonucleotide per mutation. The polymerase extends the primers without strand displacement, and the nicks created are sealed by the components of the enzyme blend. The methylated parental DNA is restricted by DpnI (restriction endonuclease cut at GmeA TC site). The ss-mutated-DNA is converted to dsDNA in vivo in XL-10-Gold® cells.
Figure 9. Overview of the inverse PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis protocol (Fisher and Pei, (1997)), ExSite. This method requires phosphorylated primer(s). It permits insertions and deletions. DpnI, restriction endonuclease cut at GmeATC site; m, methyl group; P, phosphate group at 5¢-end of DNA.
close
 References
    Amato SF, Nakajima K, Hirano T and Chiles TC (1996) Transcriptional regulation of the junB promoter in mature B lymphocytes. Activation through a cyclic adenosine 3¢, 5¢-monophosphate-like binding site. Journal of Immunology 157: 146–155.
    Beetham PR, Kipp PB, Sawycky XL, Arntzen CJ and May GD (1999) A tool for functional plant genomics: chimeric RNA/DNA oligonucleotides cause in vivo gene-specific mutations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 96: 8774–8778.
    Bittova L, Sumandea M and Cho W (1999) A structure–function study of the C2 domain of cytosolic phospholipase A2. Identification of essential calcium ligands and hydrophobic membrane binding residues. Journal of Biological Chemistry 274: 9665–9672.
    Brons-Poulsen J, Petersen NE, Horder M and Kristiansen K (1998) An improved PCR-based method for site directed mutagenesis using megaprimers. Molecular and Cellular Probes 12: 345–348.
    Chan B, Satriano JA and Schuster VL (1999) Mapping the substrate binding site of the prostaglandin transporter PGT by cysteine scanning mutagenesis. Journal of Biological Chemistry 274: 25564–25570.
    book Dieffenbach CW, Lowe TMJ and Dveksler GS (1995) "General concepts for PCR primer design". In: Dvesler GS (ed.) PCR Primer, A Laboratory Manual, pp. 133–155. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
    Doan T and Aymerich S (2003) Regulation of the central glycolytic genes in Bacillus subtilis: binding of the repressor CggR to its single DNA target sequence is modulated by fructose-1,6-bisphosphate. Molecular Microbiology 47: 1709–1721.
    Dorrell N, Gyselman VG, Foynes S, Li SR and Wren BW (1996) Improved efficiency of inverse PCR mutagenesis. BioTechniques 21: 604–608.
    book El-Gewely MR (1991) "Oligonucleotide and multi site directed mutagenesis". In: El-Gewely MR (ed.) Site Directed Mutagenesis and Protein Engineering, pp. 161–170. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
    Fisher CL and Pei GK (1997) Modification of a PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis method. Biotechniques 23: 570–574.
    Guillier M, Allemand F, Raibaud S et al. (2002) Translational feedback regulation of the gene for L35 in Escherichia coli requires binding of ribosomal protein L20 to two sites in its leader mRNA: a possible case of ribosomal RNA–messenger RNA molecular mimicry. RNA 8: 878–889.
    Hagen FK, Hazes B, Raffo R, DeSa D and Tabak LA (1999) Structure–function analysis of the UDP-N-acetyl-d-galactosamine:polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase. Essential residues lie in a predicted active site cleft resembling a lactose repressor fold. Journal of Biological Chemistry 274: 6797–6803.
    Hale R and Thompson G (1998) Codon optimization of the gene encoding a domain from human type 1 neurofibromin protein results in a threefold improvement in expression level in Escherichia coli. Protein Expression and Purification 12: 185–188.
    Hammerle M, Bauer J, Rose M et al. (1998) Proteins of newly isolated mutants and the amino-terminal proline are essential for ubiquitin-proteasome-catalyzed catabolite degradation of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Biological Chemistry 273: 25000–25005.
    Herring CD, Glasner JD and Blattner FR (2003) Gene replacement without selection: regulated suppression of amber mutations in Escherichia coli. Gene 311: 153–163.
    Ho S, Hunt HD, Horton RM, Pullen JK and Pease LR (1989) Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction. Gene 77: 51–59.
    Hogrefe HH, Cline J, Youngblood GL and Allen RM (2002) Creating randomized amino acid libraries with the QuikChange multi site-directed mutagenesis kit. Biotechniques 33(5): 1158–1160, 1162, 1164–1165.
    Hutchinson III CA, Phillips S, Edgell MH et al. (1978) Mutagenesis at a specific position in a DNA sequence. Journal of Biological Chemistry 253(18): 6551–6560.
    book Innis MA and Gelfand DH (1994) "Optimization of PCRs". In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ and White TJ (eds) PCR Protocols, A Guide to Methods and Applications, pp. 5–11. London: CRC Press.
    Ishii TM, Zerr P, Xia XM et al. (1998) Site-directed mutagenesis. Methods in Enzymology 293: 53–71.
    Kochevenko A and Willmitzer L (2003) Chimeric RNA/DNA oligonucleotide-based site-specific modification of the tobacco acetolactate syntase gene. Plant Physiology 132: 174–184.
    Kelleher JE and Raleigh EA (1991) A novel activity in Esherichia coli K-12 that directs restriction of DNA modified at CG dinucleotides. Journal of Bacteriology 173: 5220–5223.
    Komori K, Ichiyanagi K, Morikawa K and Ishino Y (1999) PI-PfuI and PI-PfuII, intein-coded homing endonucleases from Pyrococcus furiosus. II. Characterization of the binding and cleavage abilities by site-directed mutagenesis. Nucleic Acids Research 27: 4175–4182.
    Kunkel TA (1985) Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 82: 488–492.
    Kunkel TA, Bebenek K and McClary J (1991) Efficient site-directed mutagenesis using uracil-containing DNA. Methods in Enzymology 204: 125–139.
    Kwok S, Kellogg DE, McKinney N et al. (1990) Effects of primer–template mismatches on the polymerase chain reaction: human immunodeficiency virus 1 model studies. Nucleic Acids Research 18: 999–1005.
    Olsen D, Sayers JR and Eckstein F (1993) Site-directed mutagenesis of single-stranded and double-stranded DNA by phosphorothioate approach. Methods in Enzymology 217: 189–217.
    Papp PP, Nagy T, Ferenczi S et al. (2002) Binding sites of different geometries for the 16-3 phage repressor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 99: 8790–8795.
    Plapp B (1995) Site-directed mutagenesis: a tool for studying enzyme catalysis. Methods in Enzymology 249: 91–119.
    Rossant J and Nagy A (1995) Genome engineering: the new mouse genetics. Nature Medicine 1: 592–594.
    book Sharrocks AD (1994) "The design of primers for PCR". In: Griffin HG and Griffin AM (eds) PCR Technology, Current Innovations, pp. 5–11. London: CRC Press.
    Stemmer WPC and Morris SK (1992) Enzymatic inverse PCR: a restriction site independent, single-fragment method for high-efficiency, site-directed mutagenesis. Biotechniques 13: 214–220.
    Storbakk N, Fenton C, Riise HM, Nilsen IW and El-Gewely MR (1996) In vivo interaction between mutated tryptophan repressors of Escherichia coli. Journal of Molecular Biology 256: 889–896.
    Su T-Z and El-Gewely MR (1988) A multisite-directed mutagenesis using T7 DNA polymerase: application for reconstructing a mammalian gene. Gene 69: 81–89.
    book Thein S and Wallace RB (1986) "The use of synthetic oligonucleotides as specific hybridization probes in the diagnosis of genetic disorders". In: Davis KE (ed.) Human Genetic Diseases: A Practical Approach, pp. 33–35. Virginia: IRL Press.
    Varshavsky A (1996) The N-end rule: functions, mysteries, uses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 93: 12142–12149.
    Waite-Rees PA, Keating CJ, Moran LS et al. (1991) Characterization and expression of the Esherichia coli Mrr restriction system. Journal of Bacteriology 173: 5207–5219.
    Wang CC, Fernando LP and Low PS (1996) Rapid site-directed mutagenesis by a method that selects for full length mutated DNA. Nucleic Acids Research 24: 1378–1379.
    Wang S, Liu M, Lewin NE et al. (1999) Probing the binding of indolactam-V to protein kinase C through site-directed mutagenesis and computational docking simulations. Journal of Medical Chemistry 42: 3436–3446.
    Wang W and Malcolm BA (1999) Two-stage PCR protocol allowing introduction of multiple mutations, deletions and insertions using QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis. Biotechniques 26: 680–682.
    Weiner MP, Costa GL, Schoettlin W et al. (1994) Site-directed mutagenesis of double-stranded DNA by the polymerase chain reaction. Gene 151: 119–123.
    Xu H and El-Gewely MR (2003) Differentially expressed downstream genes in cells with normal or mutated p53. Oncology Research 13: 429–436.
    Xu H, Petersen EI, Petersen SB and El-Gewely MR (1999) Random mutagenesis libraries: optimization and simplification by PCR. Biotechniques 27: 1102–1108.
    Yao Y, Pattabiraman N, Michne WF, Huang XP and Hampson DR (2003) Molecular modeling and mutagenesis of the ligand-binding pocket of the mGlu3 subtype of metabotropic glutamate receptor. Journal of Neurochemistry 86(4): 947–957.
    Yoshikawa F, Uchiyama T, Iwasaki H et al. (1999) High efficient expression of the functional ligand binding site of the inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor in Escherichia coli. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 257: 792–797.
    Zhu L (1996) In vitro site-directed mutagenesis using the unique restriction site elimination (USE) method. Methods in Molecular Biology 57: 13–29.
    Zimmerman K, Scholten JD, Huang CC, Fierke CA and Hupe DJ (1998) High-level expression of rat farnesyl: protein transferase in Escherichia coli as a translationally coupled heterodimer. Protein Expression and Purification 14: 395–402.
 Further Reading
    DeLaBarre B, Thompson PR, Wright GD and Berghuis AM (2000) Crystal structures of homoserine dehydrogenase suggest a novel catalytic mechanism for oxidoreductases. Nature Structural Biology 7: 238–244.
    Kawata Y, Tamura K, Kawamura M et al. (2000) Cloning and over-expression of thermostable Bacillus sp. YM55-1 aspartase and site-directed mutagenesis for probing a catalytic residue. European Journal of Biochemistry 267: 1847–1857.
    Kochhar S, Lamzin VS, Razeto A et al. (2000) Roles of His205, His296, His303 and Asp259 in catalysis by NAD+-specific D-lactate dehydrogenase. European Journal of Biochemistry 267: 1633–1639.
    Li J, Wang XQ, Watson MB and Assmann SM (2000) Regulation of abscisic acid-induced stomatal closure and anion channels by guard cell AAPK kinase. Science 287: 300–303.
    Mawjood AH, Miyazaki G, Kaneko R, Wada Y and Imai K (2000) Site-directed mutagenesis in hemoglobin: test of functional homology of the F9 amino acid residues of hemoglobin alpha and beta chains. Protein Engineering 13: 113–120.
    Merz A, Yee MC, Szadkowski H et al. (2000) Improving the catalytic activity of a thermophilic enzyme at low temperatures. Biochemistry 39: 880–889.
    Raffai R, Weisgraber KH, MacKenzie R et al. (2000) Binding of an antibody mimetic of the human low density lipoprotein receptor to apolipoprotein E is governed through electrostatic forces. Studies using site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modelling. Journal of Biological Chemistry 275: 7109–7116.
    Smith M (1985) In vitro mutagenesis. Annual Review of Genetics 19: 423–462.
    Van Way SM, Hosking ER, Braun TF and Manson MD (2000) Mot protein assembly into the bacterial flagellum: a model based on mutational analysis of the motB gene. Journal of Molecular Biology 297: 7–24.
    Xu Y, Kakhniashvili DA, Gremse DA et al. (2000) The yeast mitochondrial citrate transport protein. Probing the roles of cysteines, arg(181), and arg(189) in transporter function. Journal of Biological Chemistry 275: 7117–7124.
    Zhang Z, Smith BA, Wang L et al. (2003) A new strategy for the site-specific modification of proteins in vivo. Biochemistry 42(22): 6735–6746.
Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
El‐Gewely, M Raafat, Fenton, Chris, Kjeldsen, Elisabeth, and Xu, Hao(Sep 2005) Mutagenesis: Site‐specific. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1038/npg.els.0003842]