Regeneration in Hydra

Hydra have a remarkable ability to regenerate after bisection or dissociation. Hydra regeneration offers a unique way to investigate ancestral molecular mechanisms leading to the establishment of organizer activity during animal development.

Keywords: cnidarian; morphogenesis; organizer activity; evolution

Figure 1. Photograph and diagram illustrating the anatomy of a hydra. Reproduced with permission from Lenhoff HM and Lenhoff SG (1988) Trembley's polyps. Scientific American 256(4): 108–113. Photograph by Richard D. Campbell of the University of California at Irvine.
Figure 2. The developmental programme is never locked in hydra. (a) In adult polyps, active patterning processes are maintained through the coupling of differentiation and migration of cells located in the body column towards the extremities. (b) Vegetative reproduction through budding is allowed to occur only in a limited area of the gastric column. (c, d) Apical or basal regeneration is observed either after bisection of the animal (c), or on reaggregation after complete dissociation of the hydra into single cells (d). In (c) the time necessary to rebuild the amputated structure depends on the level of the bisection: in Hydra vulgaris, the apex is regenerated in about 2 days and basal region in 1 day after midgastric section. (e) Sexual development is required for survival in less temperate natural conditions. Te, testis; Ov, ovocyte.
Figure 3. Scheme depicting the various cellular steps observed before epimorphic regeneration is fully achieved in different model systems (time is not to scale). In urodeles, the two initial phases last about 2 weeks; in planarians, the blastema appears after 1 day; and in hydra, the apical-organizer activity is established within a few hours after cutting. Endodermal cells are involved in body regeneration but not in appendage regeneration. Reproduced from Galliot B (1997). Copyright © 1997 with permission from John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Figure 4. (a) Level of apical-organizer activity deduced from the observed rate of secondary head induction in the host upon transplantation of the stump (according to MacWilliams, 1983). Two distinct components were characterized. The first was restricted to the stump region (no gradient), was detected even in absence of nerve cell differentiation, and decayed over 18 h. The second was measured as a gradient having its maxima in the stump, relying on differentiation of new nerve cells, and was still detectable after 48 h, by which time the new head had emerged. During the postcutting inhibition period, no induction of secondary head was observed. (b) Landmarks for molecular signalling during hydra regeneration. Posttranslational modifications are observed immediately after cutting while expression of head- and foot-specific genes requires several hours before reaching detectable levels in the stump. As observed for the postcutting inhibition in transplantation experiments, the time before induction of ‘early’ gene expression depends on the position of the section along the body column.
close
 References
    Browne EN (1909) The production of new hydranths in hydra by the insertion of small grafts. Journal of Experimental Zoology 7: 1–37.
    Cardenas MM and Salgado LM (2003) STK, the src homologue, is responsible for the initial commitment to develop head structures in Hydra. Developmental Biology 264: 495–505.
    Fabila Y, Navarro L, Fujisawa T, Bode HR and Salgado LM (2002) Selective inhibition of protein kinases blocks the formation of a new axis, the beginning of budding, in Hydra. Mechanisms of Development 119: 157–164.
    Fujisawa T (2003) Hydra regeneration and epitheliopeptides. Developmental Dynamics 226: 182–189.
    Galliot B (1997) Signaling molecules in regenerating hydra. BioEssays 19: 37–46.
    Galliot B (2000) Conserved and divergent genes in apex and axis development of cnidarians. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development 10: 629–637.
    Gierer A, Berking S, Bode H et al. (1972) Regeneration of hydra from reaggregated cells. Nature New Biology 239: 98–101.
    Hampe W, Urny J, Franke I et al. (1999) A head-activator binding protein is present in hydra in a soluble and a membrane-anchored form. Development 126: 4077–4086.
    Hassel M, Bridge DM, Stover NA, Kleinholz H and Steele RE (1998) The level of expression of a protein kinase C gene may be an important component of the patterning process in Hydra. Genes, Development and Evolution 207: 502–514.
    Hobmayer B, Rentzsch F, Kuhn K et al. (2000) WNT signalling molecules act in axis formation in the diploblastic metazoan Hydra. Nature 407: 186–189.
    Hoffmeister SA (1996) Isolation and characterization of two new morphogenetically active peptides from Hydra vulgaris. Development 122: 1941–1948.
    Hoffmeister-Ullerich SA (2001) The foot formation stimulating peptide pedibin is also involved in patterning of the head in hydra. Mechanisms of Development 106: 37–45.
    Holstein TW, Hobmayer E and Technau U (2003) Cnidarians: an evolutionarily conserved model system for regeneration? Developmental Dynamics 226: 257–267.
    proceedings Kaloulis K, Chera S, Hassel M, Gauchat D and Galliot B (2004) Reactivation of developmental programs: the cAMP-response element-binding protein pathway is involved in hydra head regeneration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 101: 2363–2368.
    book Lenhoff SG and Lenhoff HM (1986) Hydra and the Birth of Experimental Biology, 1744: Abraham Trembley's Memoirs Concerning the Natural History of a Type of Freshwater Polyp with Arms Shaped like Horns. Pacific Grove: Boxwood Press.
    Lohmann JU and Bosch TC (2000) The novel peptide HEADY specifies apical fate in a simple radially symmetric metazoan. Genes & Development 14: 2771–2777.
    MacWilliams HK (1983) Hydra transplantation phenomena and the mechanismof Hydra head regeneration. II. Properties of the head activation. Developmental Biology 96: 239–257.
    Müller W (1996) Pattern formation in the immortal Hydra. Trends in Genetics 12: 91–96.
    book Pallas PS (1766) "Miscellania Zoologica". The Hague, The Netherlands.
    Sarras MP Jr, Yan L, Leontovich A and Zhang JS (2002) Structure, expression, and developmental function of early divergent forms of metalloproteinases in hydra. Cell Research 12: 163–176.
    Schaller HC and Bodenmüller H (1981) Isolation and amino acid sequence of a morphogenic peptide in hydra. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 78: 7000–7004.
    Schaller HC, Hoffmeister SA and Dubel S (1989) Role of the neuropeptide head activator for growth and development in hydra and mammals. Development (suppl.) 107: 99–107.
    Steele RE (2002) Developmental signaling in Hydra: what does it take to build a ‘simple’ animal? Developmental Biology 248: 199–219.
    Sugiyama T and Wanek N (1993) Genetic analysis of developmental mechanisms in hydra. XXI. Enhancement of regeneration in a regeneration-deficient mutant strain by the elimination of the interstitial cell lineage. Developmental Biology 160: 64–72.
    Takahashi T, Muneoka Y, Lohmann J et al. (1997) Systematic isolation of peptide signal molecules regulating development in hydra: LWamide and PW families. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 94: 1241–1246.
    book Trembley A (1744) "Mémoires pour servir à l’histoire d’un genre de polypes d’eau douce", à bras en forme de cornes. Leiden: Verbeek.
    proceedings Technau U, Cramer Von Laue C et al. (2000) Parameters of self-organization in hydra aggregates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 97: 12127–12131.
    Zhang J, Leontovich A and Sarras MP Jr (2001) Molecular and functional evidence for early divergence of an endothelin-like system during metazoan evolution: analysis of the Cnidarian, hydra. Development 128: 1607–1615.
 Further Reading
    Berking S (1979) Analysis of head and foot formation in Hydra by means of an endogenous inhibitor. Rouxs Archives of Developmental Biology 186: 189–210.
    Broun M and Bode HR (2002) Characterization of the head organizer in hydra. Development 129: 875–884.
    book Bosch TCG (1998) "Hydra". In: Feretti P and Geraudie L (eds) Cellular and Molecular Basis of Regeneration: From Invertebrates to Humans, chap. 4, pp. 111–134. Chichester: Wiley.
    book Dinsmore CE (1991) "A History of Regeneration Research". Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Gierer A and Meinhardt H (1972) A theory of biological pattern formation. Kybernetik 12: 30–39.
Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Galliot, Brigitte(Jan 2006) Regeneration in Hydra. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1038/npg.els.0004186]