Caenorhabditis elegans Embryo: Establishment of Asymmetry

In Caenorhabditis elegans, anterior/posterior asymmetry is established in the one-cell embryo in response to the sperm's position. Polarity proteins become localized in cortical domains and function to produce asymmetric expression patterns of regulators of developmental fate.

Keywords: C. elegans; embryogenesis; asymmetric division; polarity; cell-fate specification

Figure 1. Asymmetric cell divisions produce blastomeres with distinct fates. Posterior is to the right. (a) The invariant division pattern leads to a precise arrangement of cells and the birth of six founder cells. The founder cells and the germline precursor cells (P cells) are labelled, and cells derived from each founder are indicated by shading. For simplicity, the 16-cell embryo at bottom does not show the daughter cells of the fourth AB cleavage, which occurs at about the same time as the P3 division. (b) Diagrammatic representation of the early lineage, showing the major cell types produced by each founder cell. Horizontal lines indicate cell divisions, and the lengths of the vertical lines indicate relative differences in cell cycle rates of each blastomere.
Figure 2. Establishment of asymmetries in the early embryo. Posterior is to the right in all embryos. Just after fertilization, PAR-3/PAR-6/PKC-3 are initially localized uniformly at the cortex and contractions occur throughout the cortex. (a) The close association of the sperm with the cortex results in a local cessation of cortical contractile activity, but cortical contractions (small indentations) continue in the anterior. Cortical cytoplasm (arrows), NMY-2, and anterior PARs begin to flow towards the anterior, and PAR-2 localizes to the posterior cortex. (b) Asymmetric PAR domains are established, internal cytoplasm and P granules flow towards the sperm pronucleus, while more cortical cytoplasm flows away. As ruffling culminates in a medial pseudocleavage furrow, the female pronucleus migrates towards the sperm pronucleus. (c) P granules are localized to the posterior pole by the time of pronuclear meeting. (d) First division is intrinsically asymmetric resulting in an anterior cell AB and a posterior cell P1 that differ in cytoplasmic inheritance and PAR protein domains; PAR-3 is present around the AB cortex while PAR-2 is present around the P1 cortex. (e) As the P1 cell cycle progresses, PAR protein asymmetry and cellular polarity are reestablished in this cell.
Figure 3. Localized cell fate regulators and signalling pathways in the early embryo. (a) The establishment of polarity in the one-cell embryo leads to the localized expression of cell fate regulators. The expression of various regulators at different stages is shown; for simplicity, only GLP-1 protein is shown in the 12-cell embryo. Arrows indicate the direction of cell–cell signalling events. Note that SKN-1 is enriched in the nucleus of the P lineage cells beginning at the two-cell stage. SKN-1 levels peak at the four-cell stage, then gradually disappear by the 12-cell stage. However, PAL-1 is present in the P lineage nuclei beginning at the four-cell stage and persists after SKN-1 disappears. Nuclear PIE-1 is shown; PIE-1 is also present in the cytoplasm and on P granules in the P cells. GLP-1 protein is present on the membranes of AB lineage cells. MEX-5 protein is present in the cytoplasm of somatic cells. (b) Model for how Src, Wnt signalling and MAPK signalling converge to establish the E cell fate. Arrows show positive interactions, while barred lines show inhibitory interactions. The mom genes (for more muscles) are required for downregulating POP-1 levels in the E cell, and thus allowing the endoderm fate. MOM-1 (Porcupine) is required for the production of the MOM-2 (Wingless/Wnt) signal in the P2 cell. The MOM-5 (Frizzled) receptor acts in EMS to receive the signal. Based on mutant phenotypes in C. elegans, and Wnt signalling in other systems, MOM-5 is proposed to act through three partially redundant proteins DSH-2, MIG-5 and DSH-1 (Dishevelled family members), and SGG-1 (Shaggy/Gsk-3) and WRM-1 (Armadillo) to negatively regulate levels of nuclear POP-1 (TCF/LEF). The MOM-4 (MAPKKK) and LIT-1 (Nemo/MAPK) proteins also converge at WRM-1, and the MES-1 tyrosine kinase and SRC-1 kinase act in a parallel pathway that has been postulated to converge at WRM-1 as well. Only some of the Wnt pathway genes are required for spindle orientation, indicating a branch in the pathway. Drosophila and/or vertebrate homologues are indicated in parentheses.
Figure 4. Division patterns are determined by centrosome migrations and nuclear rotation. All embryos are left views, except (g) which is a dorsal view. Posterior is to the right. The small black circles represent centrosomes, lines represent astral microtubules and arrows indicate directions of centrosome movements. The number of astral microtubules drawn is reduced for clarity. Open circles represent interphase or prophase nuclei, black bars are chromosomes in metaphase or anaphase. (a) The female pronucleus meets the sperm pronucleus in the posterior. (b) The pronuclei centre and rotate so that the first spindle (c) is aligned on the long axis of the embryo. In two-cell embryos (d), centrosomes migrate until they are on opposite sides of the nuclei. In P1, there is a subsequent 90° nuclear rotation (e) to align the spindle on the anterior/posterior axis (f). At the four-cell stage, centrosomes migrate on to the left/right axis (g) and the spindle forms on this axis in ABa and ABp (h, only the spindle pole is visible). In EMS, the nucleus then rotates 90° on to the anterior/posterior axis (h, i). A 45° nuclear rotation orients the P2 spindle towards the site of contact with EMS, but division is dorsal/ventral due to constraints of cellular arrangements and the eggshell (not shown).
Figure 5. Model for PAR-dependent spindle positioning. G/GPR signalling is required for forces that pull on microtubules from the cortex (+), while LET-99 inhibits force (–). Note that both LET-99 and GPR localize to the entire cortex, but only the regions with highest levels are indicated for simplicity. (a) During nuclear rotation, GPR is uniformly low at the cortex, but LET-99 localizes to the cortex in a posterior band pattern in response to PAR-3. Inhibition of G/GPR signalling in the band would result in reduced force on lateral and posterior microtubles compared to the force acting on microtubules contacting the anterior cortex. As a result, one centrosome would experience a higher net force (large arrow) towards the anterior, than towards the posterior (small arrow). (b) At metaphase and anaphase, GPR becomes enriched at the posteriormost end of the embryo in response to PAR-3 and LET-99. The resulting increase in force at the posterior, possibly coupled with inhibition of force in the LET-99 band, would result in greater net force acting on the posterior spindle pole and thus posterior spindle displacement. Similar mechanisms are proposed to function in the P1 cell.
close
 References
    Bei Y, Hogan J, Berkowitz LA et al. (2002) SRC-1 and Wnt signaling act together to specify endoderm and to control cleavage orientation in early C. elegans embryos. Developmental Cell 3: 113–125.
    Bergmann DC, Lee M, Robertson B et al. (2003) Embryonic handedness choice in C. elegans involves the G protein GPA-16. Development 130: 5731–5740.
    Betschinger J and Knoblich JA (2004) Dare to be different: asymmetric cell division in Drosophila, C. elegans and vertebrates. Current Biology 14: R674–R685.
    Bowerman B (1998) Maternal control of pattern formation in early Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Current Topics Developmental Biology 39: 73–117.
    Cowan CR and Hyman AA (2004a) Asymmetric cell division in C. elegans: cortical polarity and spindle positioning. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 20: 427–453.
    Cowan CR and Hyman AA (2004b) Centrosomes direct cell polarity independently of microtubule assembly in C. elegans embryos. Nature 431: 92–96.
    Cuenca AA, Schetter A, Aceto D, Kemphues K and Seydoux G (2003) Polarization of the C. elegans zygote proceeds via distinct establishment and maintenance phases. Development 130: 1255–1265.
    DeRenzo C, Reese KJ and Seydoux G (2003) Exclusion of germ plasm proteins from somatic lineages by cullin-dependent degradation. Nature 424: 685–689.
    book Gönczy P and Rose LS (2005) "Asymmetric cell division and axis formation in the embryo". In: The C. elegans Research Community (ed.) Wormbook. doi/10.1895/wormbook.1.7.1, http://www.wormbook.org (June 2005).
    book Kemphues KJ and Strome S (1997) "Fertilization and establishment of polarity in the embryo". In: Riddle DL, Blumenthal T, Meyer BJ and Priess JR (eds.) C. elegans II, pp. 335–359. (Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press)
    Korswagen HC (2002) Canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways in Caenorhabditis elegans: variations on a common signaling theme. Bioessays 24: 801–810.
    Munro E, Nance J and Priess JR (2004) Cortical flows powered by asymmetrical contraction transport PAR proteins to establish and maintain anterior–posterior polarity in the early C. elegans embryo. Developmental Cell 7: 413–424.
    Ogura K, Kishimoto N, Mitani S, Gengyo-Ando K and Kohara Y (2003) Translational control of maternal glp-1mRNA by POS-1 and its interacting protein SPN-4 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 130: 2495–2503.
    Rose LS and Kemphues KJ (1998) Early patterning of the C. elegans embryo. Annual Review of Genetics 32: 521–545.
    Schmidt DJ, Rose DJ, Saxton WM and Strome S (2005) Functional analysis of cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain in Caenorhabditis elegans with fast-acting temperature-sensitive mutations. Molecular Biology of the Cell 16: 1200–1212.
    book Schnabel R and Priess JR (1997) "Specification of cell fates in the early embryo". In: Riddle DL, Blumenthal T, Meyer BJ and Priess JR (eds.) C. elegans II, pp. 361–382. (Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press).
    Schneider SQ and Bowerman B (2003) Cell polarity and the cytoskeleton in the Caenorhabditis elegans zygote. Annual Review of Genetics 37: 221–249.
    Sonneville R and Gonczy P (2004) Zyg-11 and cul-2 regulate progression through meiosis II and polarity establishment in C. elegans. Development 131: 3527–3543.
    Walston T, Tuskey C, Edgar L et al. (2004) Multiple Wnt signaling pathways converge to orient the mitotic spindle in early C. elegans embryos. Developmental Cell 7: 831–841.
    Wood WB (1998) Handed asymmetry in nematodes. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology 9: 53–60.
 Further Reading
    Cheeks RJ, Canman JC, Gabriel WN et al. (2004) C. elegans PAR proteins function by mobilizing and stabilizing asymmetrically localized protein complexes. Current Biology 14: 851–62.
    book Evans TC and Hunter CP (2005) "Translational control of maternal RNAs". In: The C. elegans Research Community (ed.) Wormbook. doi/10.1895/wormbook.1.7.1, http://www.wormbook.org (June 2005).
    Macara I. G (2004) Par proteins: partners in polarization. Current Biology 14: R160–R162.
    Mello CC and Conte D Jr. (2004) Revealing the world of RNA interference. Nature 431: 338–342.
    Nance J (2005) PAR proteins and the establishment of cell polarity during C. elegans development. Bioessays 27: 126–135.
    book Riddle DL, Blumenthal T, Meyer BJ and Priess JR (1997) "Introduction to C. elegans". In: Riddle DL, Blumenthal T, Meyer BJ and Priess JR (eds.) C. elegans II, pp. 1–22. (Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press).
    book Strome S (2005) "Specification of the Germline". In: The C. elegans Research Community, (ed.) Wormbook. doi/10.1895/wormbook.1.7.1, http://www.wormbook.org (June 2005).
Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Rose, Lesilee S, and Basham, Stephen E(Apr 2006) Caenorhabditis elegans Embryo: Establishment of Asymmetry. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1038/npg.els.0004224]