Palaeognathae

Abstract

Current evolutionary consensus, based on both molecular and morphological data, suggests that there are two broad subdivisions at the base of living birds (Neornithes), the neognaths (Neognathae) and palaeognathous birds (Palaeognathae). Palaeognaths are characterised by their primitive skull morphology and a secondarily acquired characteristic – flightlessness. The group, as traditionally defined and still recognised by phylogenetic analyses, includes flightless birds (ostrich, rhea, emu, cassowaries and kiwis) and flighted tinamous. Flightless forms are found today on the former landmasses of Gondwana, Africa, South America and Australia, whereas tinamous are restricted to South America. Traditionally, palaeognaths have been subdivided into ratites (all the large flightless groundbirds) and tinamous, although some data sets suggest that this classification might be overly simplistic: Recent molecular studies have concluded that the South American flighted taxa are nested within the traditional ratite grouping. This is interesting because it means that ratite flightlessness has evolved convergently at least four times.

Key Concepts:

  • The evolutionary relationships of living birds (clade Neornithes) remain poorly resolved despite more than a century and a half of investigation.

  • Palaeognaths (Palaeognathae) comprise the large, flightless living ratites (emu, ostrich, cassowary and rhea) and their smaller, flying cousins; tinamou.

  • The fossil record of palaeognaths shows that this group was once made up of medium‐sized flying birds, the oldest currently known from the Paleocene (ca. 60 million years ago (Ma)).

  • Palaeognaths are widely considered by biologists and palaeontologists to be the sister‐group of Neognaths, the clade that includes all other living birds.

Keywords: palaeognath; ratite; ostrich; emu; tinamou; cassowary; rhea; kiwi; flightless; bird; systematics; evolution; flight

Figure 1.

The broad subdivision within living birds into the Palaeognathae and Neognathae.

Figure 2.

Consensus regarding the evolutionary relationships of the Palaeognathae (including the fossil lithornithids).

close

Further Reading

Abourachid A and Renous S (2000) Bipedal locomotion in ratites (Palaeognathiform): examples of cursorial birds. Ibis 142: 538–549.

Bertelli S, Giannini NP and Goloboff PA (2002) A phylogeny of the tinamous (Aves: Palaeognathiformes) based on integumentary characters. Systematic Biology 51(6): 959–979.

Bledsoe AH (1988) A phylogenetic analysis of postcranial skeletal characters of ratite birds. Annals of the Carnegie Museum 57: 73–90.

Carroll RL (1988) Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution. New York: WH Freeman.

Dyke GJ and Kaiser G (2011) Living Dinosaurs: The Evolutionary History of Modern Birds. London: John Wiley.

Hackett SJ, KImball RT, Reddy S et al. (2008) A phylogenomic study of birds reveals their evolutionary history. Science 320: 1763–1768.

Harshman J, Braun EL, Braun MJ et al. (2008) Phylogenomic evidence for multiple losses of flight in ratite birds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 105: 13462–13467.

Houde P (1988) Paleognathous Birds from the Early Tertiary of the Northern Hemisphere. Cambridge, MA: Nuttall Ornithological Club.

Houde P and Olson SL (1981) Palaeognathous carinate birds from the early tertiary of North America. Science 214: 1236–1237.

Huxley TH (1867) On the classification of birds and on the taxonomic value of certain of the cranial bones observable in that class. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1867: 415–472.

Huynen L, Millar CD, Scofield RP and Lambert (2003) Nuclear DNA sequences detect species limits in ancient moa. Nature 425: 175–178.

Lee K, Felsenstein J and Cracraft J (1997) The phylogeny of ratite birds: resolving conflicts between molecular and morphological data sets. In: Mindell DP (ed) Avian Molecular Systematics and Evolution. New York: Academic Press.

Livezey BC and Zusi RL (2007) Higher‐order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 149: 1–95.

Mayr G (2008) Avian higher‐ level phylogeny: well‐supported clades and what we can learn from a phylogenetic analysis of 2954 morphological characters. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 46: 63–72.

Naish D (2012) Birds. In: Brett‐Surman MK, Holtz TR and Farlow JO (eds) The Complete Dinosaur, 2nd edn, pp. 379–423. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Worthy TH and Holdaway RN (2002) The Lost World of the Moa: Prehistoric Life of New Zealand. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Worthy TH and Scofield RP (2012) Twenty‐first century advances in knowledge of the biology of moa (Aves: Dinornithiformes), a new morphological analysis and diagnoses revised. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 39: 87–153.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Dyke, Gareth J, and Leonard, Leona M(Nov 2012) Palaeognathae. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0001550.pub3]