Heterozygous Advantage

Abstract

Heterozygous advantage, also called overdominance, refers to the fitness superiority of heterozygotes over homozygotes. Heterozygote advantage, frequency‐dependent selection and some modes of selection in fluctuating environments are all forms of balancing selection, which actively maintains genetic variation.

Keywords: natural selection; fitness; evolution; genetic variation; adaptation

Figure 1.

Adaptive distance plot for the human sickle cell polymorphism, drawn from the data in Table . The adaptive distance plot assumes that selection favouring heterozygotes is acting directly on the locus, and tests whether allelic frequencies are at an evolutionary equilibrium defined by the genotypic fitnesses. The fitnesses are highest in the heterozygotes, intermediate in the common homozygotes, and lowest in the rare homozygotes. The relationship between equilibrium allelic frequencies and adaptive distances is linear when selection is weak, but it may depart from linearity when selection is very strong, as is the case for SS homozygotes, which commonly perish from damage caused by blood clots.

close

References

Endler JA (1986) Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Frelinger JA (1972) The maintenance of transferrin polymorphisms in pigeons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 69: 326–329.

Gillespie JH (1991) The Causes of Molecular Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.

Mitton JB (1997) Selection in Natural Populations. New York: Oxford University Press.

Mork J and Sundnes G (1985) 0‐group cod (Gadus morhua) in captivity: differential survival of certain genotypes. Helgolander Meeresuntersuchungen 39: 63–70.

Smith DAS (1981) Heterozygous advantage experessed through sexual selection in a polymorphic African butterfly. Nature 289: 174–175.

Smouse PE (1986) The fitness consequences of multiple‐locus heterozygosity under the multiplicative overdominance and inbreeding depression models. Evolution 40: 946–957.

Turelli M and Ginzburg L (1983) Should individual fitness increase with heterozygosity? Genetics 104: 191–209.

Vrijenhoek RC (1996) Conservation genetics of North American desert fishes. In: Avise JC and Hamrick JL (eds) Conservation Genetics: Case Histories From Nature, pp. 367–397. New York: Chapman and Hall.

Watt WB (1992) Eggs, enzymes, and evolution – natural genetic variants change insect fecundity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 89: 10608–10612.

Watt WB, Carter PA and Donohue K (1986) Females' choice of ‘good genotypes’ as mates is promoted by an insect mating system. Science 233: 1187–1190.

Further Reading

Futuyma DJ (1998) Evolutionary Biology, 3rd edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

Hartl DL and Clark AG (1997) Principles of Population Genetics. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

Mitton JB (1995) Genetics and the physiological ecology of conifers. In: Smith WK and Hinckley TM (eds) Ecophysiology of Coniferous Forests, pp. 1–36. New York: Academic Press.

Mitton JB (1998) Apparent overdominance in natural plant populations. In: Lamkey DR and Staub JE (eds) Concepts and Breeding of Heterosis in Crop Plants, pp. 57–69. Published by the Crop Science Society of America. CSSA Special publication number 25.

Mitton JB (1998) Molecular markers and natural selection. In: Carvalho G (ed.) Advances in Molecular Ecology, pp. 225–239. NATO Science Series. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Mitton, Jeffry B(Mar 2002) Heterozygous Advantage. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1038/npg.els.0001760]