Mimicry

Mimicry is the resemblance of one organism to another (or to an inanimate object), a resemblance that confers an adaptive advantage on at least one of the organisms.

Keywords: predation; learning; protective coloration; evolution; genetics; behaviour

Figure 1. The five patterns of bumblebee, each constituting a mimicry ring containing several species, found in northwest Europe. In North America there is an analogous set of mimicry rings also, but with patterns that are different from those in Europe. From Turner (1995), based on work by Plowright and Owen.
Figure 2. The six very distinct rings of long-winged butterflies in South America. After Turner (1984).
Figure 3. An example of a species switching into a new mimicry ring, using a single gene mutation. H. hermathena (top right, red circles) does not normally mimic other Heliconius like H. erato (top left, green area of map), but along the lower Amazonas it occurs alongside races of H. erato (bottom left, orange parts of map) that already somewhat resemble H. hermathena in having a red bar across the forewing. In one of its populations in this area H. hermathena (bottom right, black square on map) has switched to mimicking H. erato, using a single gene mutation that removes nearly all the yellow marks on its wings. After Turner (1984), based on work by K.S. Brown and P.M. Sheppard.
Figure 4. The genetics of three of the parallel races of H. melpomene and H. erato. The black bars represent chromosomes, and each letter or pair of letters is a gene controlling a major part of the colour pattern. Note that most of the genes are on separate chromosomes. Modified from Turner (1984) using data from Mallet (1989) and Jiggins and McMillan (1997).
Figure 5. ‘Breakdown of mimicry’ in P. dardanus. The butterfly in the centre is one of the many mimetic forms of the female: it closely resembles the pattern of its model, a mimicry ring of Amauris butterflies. The butterfly on the left shows the result of back-crossing this form into the west African race, where neither it, nor its model, occurs. The mimicry is ‘spoiled’ by the appearance of the whitish-yellow bar across the tip of the forewing. The butterfly to the right shows the result of crossing the mimetic form into the population of P. dardanus from Madagascar, where there are no mimetic forms. Now the resemblance to the model is completely destroyed. Based on work by Clarke and Sheppard )(1960a).
Figure 6. The large-windowed form of P. memnon (with its model Troides helena, left), to illustrate the way most elements of the pattern are controlled by a tightly linked cluster of genes on one chromosome (the long bar with geometrical symbols to indicate the genes), while the yellow colour of the hindwing is controlled by a gene on a separate chromosome (diamond symbol). The genes in the supergene, in order from the top down: (1) remove the ‘tail’ on the hindwing and control (2) the amount of white on the hindwing, (3) the pattern of the forewing, (4) the colour of the bright triangle at the base of the forewing and (5) the colour of the tip of the abdomen. Note the coloured mark on the base of the forewing of P. memnon that mimics a colour on the body of the model. From Turner (1995), based on work of Clarke and Sheppard (1971).
close
 References
    Brower JVZ and Brower LP (1962) Experimental studies of mimicry. 6. The reaction of toads (Bufo terrestris) to honeybees (Apis mellifera) and their dronefly mimics (Eristalis vinetorum). American Naturalist 96: 297–307.
    Charlesworth D and Charlesworth B (1975) Theoretical genetics of Batesian mimicry. II. Evolution of supergenes. Journal of Theoretical Biology 55: 305–324.
    Clarke CA and Sheppard PM (1960a) The evolution of mimicry in the butterfly. Papillo clardanus. Heredity 14: 163–173.
    Clarke CA and Sheppard PM (1960b) Supergenes and mimicry. Heredity 14: 175–185.
    Clarke CA and Sheppard PM (1971) Further studies on the genetics of the mimetic butterfly Papilio memnon L. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 263: 35–70.
    book Endler JA (1991) "Interactions between predators and prey". In: Krebs JR and Davis NB (eds.) Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, 3rd edn, pp. 169–196. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific
    book Fisher RA (1930) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    Franks DW and Noble J (2004) Batesian mimics influence mimicry ring evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 271: 191–196.
    Jeffords MR, Sternburg JG and Waldbauer GP (1979) Batesian mimicry: field demonstration of the survival value of Pipevine Swallowtail and Monarch color patterns. Evolution 33: 275–286.
    Jiggins CJ and McMillan WO (1997) The genetic basis of an adaptive radiation: mimicry in two Heliconiussibling species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 264: 1167–1175.
    Jiggins CJ, Naisbit RE, Coe RL and Mallet J (2001) Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature 411: 302–305.
    Joron M and Mallet J (1998) Diversity in mimicry: paradox or paradigm?. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: 461–466.
    book Kimler WC (1983) "Mimicry: views of naturalists and ecologists before the Modern Synthesis". In: Grene M (ed.) Dimensions of Darwinism, pp. 97–127. New York: Cambridge University Press
    Mallet JLB (1989) The genetics of warning colour in Peruvian hybrid zones of Heliconius eratoand H. melpomene. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 236: 163–185.
    Orr HA (1998) The population genetics of adaptation: the distribution of factors fixed during adaptive evolution. Evolution 52: 935–941.
    book Rothschild M (1985) "British aposematic lepidoptera". In: Heath J and Emmet AM (eds.) The Moths and Butterflies of Great Britain and Ireland, vol. 2: Cossidae-Heliodinidae, pp. 9–62. Colchester, UK: Harley Books
    book Ruxton GD, Sherratt TN and Speed MP (2004) Avoiding Attack. The Evolutionary Ecology of Crypsis, Warning Signals, and Mimicry. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    Sheppard PM, Turner JRG, Brown KS Jr, Benson WW and Singer MC (1985) Genetics and the evolution of Muellerian mimicry in Heliconiusbutterflies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 308: 433–607.
    Speed MP (1993) Muellerian mimicry and the psychology of predation. Animal Behaviour 45: 571–580.
    book Turner JRG (1984) "Mimicry: the palatability spectrum and its consequences". In: Vane-Wright RI and Ackery PR (eds.) The Biology of Butterflies (Royal Entomological Society of London Symposium, no 11), pp. 141–161. New York: Academic Press
    Turner JRG (1987) The evolutionary dynamics of Batesian and Muellerian mimicry: similarities and differences. Ecological Entomology 12: 81–95.
    book Turner JRG (1995) "Mimicry as a model for coevolution". In: Arai R, Kato M and Doi Y (eds.) Biodiversity and Evolution, pp. 131–150. Tokyo: National Science Museum Foundation
    Turner JRG and Mallet JLB (1996) Did forest islands drive the diversity of warningly coloured butterflies? Biotic drift and the shifting balance. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 351: 835–845.
    Turner JRG and Speed MP (2001) How weird can mimicry get?. Evolutionary Ecology 13: 807–827.
 Further Reading
    book Edmunds M (1974) Defence in Animals. A Survey of Antipredator Defences. Harlow, Essex: Longman.
    book Gilbert LE (1983) "Coevolution and mimicry". In: Futuyma DJ and Slatkin M (eds.) Coevolution, pp. 263-281. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
    Rowe C (ed.) (2001) Warning signals and mimicry. Special issue. Evolutionary Ecology 13: 601–827.
    Turner JRG (1985) Fisher's evolutionary faith and the challenge of mimicry. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 2: 159–196.
    book Wickler W (1968) Mimicry in Plants and Animals (English translation by Martin RD). London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Turner, John RG(Jan 2006) Mimicry. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1038/npg.els.0004152]