Protozoan Nutrition and Metabolism

Harriett E Smith‐Somerville, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA
Hope T Ziemkiewicz, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA
Phillip E Ryals, University of West Florida, Pensacola, Florida, USA

Published online: May 2005

DOI: 10.1038/npg.els.0001928

Abstract

Protozoa are found in almost every type of moist habitat, a range that encompasses salt and fresh waters, soil, host organisms and environments with extremes in temperature. Their success is due in part to the ability of different protozoa to use diverse and often changing nutritional sources.

Keywords: culture; endocytosis; pinocytosis; phagocytosis; protozoa

Figure 1.

Series of light micrographs showing progress of vacuoles through the digestive cycle in the ciliate Tetrahymena vorax. The vacuoles contain particles of India ink, which are not degraded by digestive enzymes. (a) Nascent vacuole attached to cytostome (arrow) and newly formed vacuole (V) near oral region. (b) Two vacuoles undergoing acidification. The decrease in the diameter of the vacuoles condenses the contents into a compact mass. (c) A vacuole at a time when the pH of the vacuole is the most acidic. (d) A vacuole after fusion with lysosomes. The addition of the lysosomal membrane results in a clear region between the compact India ink mass and the vacuole membrane (arrow). (e) A vacuole at the posterior end of the cell late in the digestive cycle. (f) A mass of India ink particles recently released from the cytoproct (arrow) at the posterior end of the cell. Bars=10 μm. Reproduced with permission from Mislan and Smith‐Somerville .
Figure 2.

Electron micrographs of vacuoles with ingested food. (a) Partially digested bacteria in vacuole (V) in the ciliate Tetrahymena vorax after fusion of lysosomes with the phagosome. (b) Wood in vacuole in Pyrsonympha vertens, an intestinal flagellate of the termite Reticulitermes flavipes. Arrows indicate sites of endocytosis at the cell surface. Bars=1 μm.
Figure 3.

Macrostomal cells of the polymorphic ciliate Tetrahymena vorax. The microstomal form (shown in Figure ) differentiates into this cell type in response to a signal released by potential prey. (a) A prey protozoan (P) in a vacuole before separation from the cytostome. (b) Two vacuoles (V) with protozoa in different stages of digestion. Bar=10 μm.
close

References

Allen RD and Fok AK (2000) Membrane trafficking and processing in Paramecium. International Review of Cytology 198: 277–318.

Bowers B and Olszewski TE (1972) Pinocytosis in Acanthamoeba castellanii. Kinetics and morphology. Journal of Cell Biology 53: 681–694.

Bruce DL and Marshall JM Jr (1965) Some ionic and bioelectric properties of the ameoba Chaos chaos. Journal of General Physiology 49: 151–178.

Hausmann K and Peck RK (1979) The mode of function of the cytopharyngeal basket of the ciliate Pseudomicrothorax dubius. Differentiation 14: 147–158.

Khan NA (2001) Pathogenicity, morphology, and differentiation of Acanthamoeba. Current Microbiology 43: 391–395.

Lee, JJ and Soldo, AT (eds) (1992) Protocols in Protozoology. Lawrence, KS: Allen Press.

Mislan TW and Smith‐Somerville HE (1986) Food vacuole morphology and membrane retrieval in the microstomal form of Tetrahymena vorax. Journal of Protozoology 33: 172–179.

Schousboe P, Wheatley DN and Rasmussen L (1998) Autocrine/paracrine activator of cell proliferation: purification of a 4–6 kDa compound with growth‐factor‐like effects in Tetrahymena thermophila. Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry 8: 130–137.

Smith‐Somerville HE, Hardman JK, Timkovich R et al. (2000) A complex of iron and nucleic acid catabolites is a signal that triggers differentiation in a freshwater protozoan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 97: 7325–7330.

Tanabe H, Nishi N, Takagi Y et al. (1990) Purification and identification of a growth factor produced by Paramecium tetraurelia. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 170: 786–792.

Further Reading

Anderson OR (1988) Comparative Protozoology, Ecology, Physiology, Life History. New York: Springer.

ATCC (2003) American Type Culture Collection. [http://www.atcc.org.]

CCAP (2003) Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa. [http://www.ife.ac.uk/ccap/index.html.]

Chapman‐Andresen C (1973) Endocytic processes. In: Jeon KW (ed.) The Biology of Amoeba, pp. 319–348. New York: Academic Press.

Christensen ST, Leick V, Rasmussen L and Wheatley DN (1998) Signaling in unicellular eukaryotes. International Review of Cytology 177: 181–253.

Hausmann K and Hülsmann N (1996) Protozoology, 2nd edn. Stuttgart: Gerog Thieme Verlag.

Nisbet B (1984) Nutrition and Feeding Strategies in Protozoa. London: Croom Helm.

Rasmussen L (1976) Nutrient uptake in Tetrahymena pyriformis. Carlsberg Research Communications 41: 143–167.

Ryals PE, Smith‐Somerville HE and Buhse HE Jr. (2002) Phenotype switching in polymorphic Tetrahymena: a single‐cell Jekyll and Hyde. International Review of Cytology 212: 209–238.

Sleigh MA (2000) Trophic strategies. In: Leadbeater BSC and Green JC (eds) The Flagellates: Unity, Diversity and Evolution, pp. 147–165. London: Taylor & Francis.

Related Sub-Topics:

Protozoa | Energetics and Catabolism
Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

Article Title: Protozoan Nutrition and Metabolism
 
How to Cite close
Smith‐Somerville, Harriett E, Ziemkiewicz, Hope T, and Ryals, Phillip E(May 2005) Protozoan Nutrition and Metabolism. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1038/npg.els.0001928]