Self‐incompatibility

Self-incompatibility (SI) is a genetically controlled cell–cell recognition system that acts as a barrier to self pollination in a wide range of flowering plant species. Several different SI mechanisms have been identified.

Keywords: S-receptor kinase (SRK); S-RNAase; F-box; actin depolymerization; calcium signalling; programmed cell death (PCD)

Figure 1. Proposed mechanisms for the self-incompatibility reaction in the S-RNAase system. The products of the female S gene, the S-RNAases, are secreted into the transmitting tissue of the style. Pollen growing through the style encounters the S-RNAases. If the pollen carries an S haplotype corresponding to either of the haplotypes present in the style, then inhibition occurs. Two models have been proposed for the inhibition mechanism. Compatible (Sx-, left) and incompatible (Sa-, right) pollinations are shown on an SaSb pistil. Symbols for pistil factors (S-RNAase, HT-B and 120 K) and pollen factor (SLF) are shown below: (a) S-RNAase degradation model. S-RNAase enters the pollen tube cytoplasm from the ECM (arrows). A compatible nonself-S-RNAase/SLF interaction (left) results in ubiquitylation and degradation of S-RNAases by the 26S proteasome, so there is no cytotoxic action and pollen tube growth continues. An incompatible self-S-RNAase/SLF interaction (right) does not result in S-RNAase degradation; cytotoxicity results in RNA degradation and so incompatible pollen tube growth is inhibited. (b) S-RNAase compartmentalization model. S-RNAase, 120 K and HT-B are taken up by endocytosis and sorted to a vacuole. In a compatible interaction (left), S-RNAase remains compartmentalized, so although S-RNAase is present it is not cytotoxic because it is sequestered. Degradation of HT-B in compatible pollen tubes is mediated by a hypothetical pollen protein (PP). How S-RNAase gains access to SLF (arrow, question mark) is not known. In an incompatible interaction (right), HT-B is not degraded and the vacuolar compartment containing S-RNAases degrades. S-RNAase is released into the cytoplasm and RNA is degraded by its cytotoxic action, and pollen tube growth is inhibited. Adapted from McClure and Franklin-Tong (2006). With kind permission of Springer Science and Business Media.
Figure 2. A proposed model for the self-incompatibility mechanism in Papaver rhoeas. Incompatible pollen undergoes an S haplotype-specific interaction. Secreted stigmatic S-proteins interact with the pollen S receptor. An haplotype-specific interaction such as binding S1 protein to S1 pollen results in triggering an intracellular Ca2+ signalling cascade(s), involving large-scale Ca2+ influx and increases in [Ca2+]i. A series of events then occur in the incompatible pollen. Within 1 min there is a dissipation of the tip-focused calcium gradient that is required for continued pollen growth and the activation of calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPK). The CDPK phosphorylates Pr-p26.1, a soluble inorganic pyrophosphatase (sPPase). Both calcium and phosphorylation inhibit sPPase activity, resulting in a reduction in the biosynthetic capability of the pollen, thereby inhibiting growth. Dramatic changes to pollen cytoskeleton organization are apparent within 1 min, with extensive depolymerization of the F-actin accompanying this, also predicted to cause rapid arrest of tip growth. p56-MAPK is activated and may signal to PCD. PCD is triggered, involving key features of PCD including caspase-like activity, cytochrome c leakage and DNA fragmentation. This ensures that incompatible pollen does not start to grow again. Adapted from McClure and Franklin-Tong (2006). With kind permission of Springer Science and Business Media.
Figure 3. A proposed model for the Brassica self-incompatibility reaction. In Brassica the SI response occurs within the stigma. When a pollen grain alights on the papilla surface the pollen coat flows to form an adhesive ‘foot’, thus making a connection with the surface of the stigmatic papilla. The pollen S locus cysteine-rich (SCR/SP11) protein is carried within this coating and when this is allelic with the recipient stigma, an incompatible reaction is induced. SCR binds to the extracellular domain of the S receptor kinase (SRK), which results in the activation of the kinase. The role of the S locus glycoprotein (SLG) in this recognition event is unclear, as evidence suggests it is not essential for the SI reaction. However in some S haplotypes it does appear to enhance the SI response. MLPK (M locus protein kinase) a membrane localized protein is a positive effector of SI and may form a complex with SRK. Following activation SRK interacts with ARC1 in a phosphorylation-dependent manner. This ultimately leads to pollen rejection by some, as yet, unknown mechanism.
close
 References
    de Graaf BHJ, Rudd JJ, Wheeler MJ et al. (2006) Self-incompatibility in Papaver targets soluble inorganic pyrophosphatases in pollen. Nature 444: 490–493.
    Franklin-Tong VE, Hackett G and Hepler PK (1997) Ratio-imaging of [Ca2+]i in the self-incompatibility response in pollen tubes of Papaver rhoeas. Plant Journal 12: 1375–1386.
    Goldraij A, Kondo K, Lee CB et al. (2006) Compartmentalization of S-RNAase and HT-B degradation in self-incompatible Nicotiana. Nature 439: 805–810.
    McClure B and Franklin-Tong V (2006) Gametophytic self-incompatibility: understanding the cellular mechanisms involved in self pollen tube inhibition. Planta 224: 233–245.
    McClure BA, Gray JE, Anderson MA and Clarke AE (1990) Self-incompatibility in Nicotiana alata involves degradation of pollen rRNA. Nature 347: 757–760.
    Qiao H, Wang F, Zhao L et al. (2004) The F-box protein AhSLF-S2 controls the pollen function of S-RNAase-based self-incompatibility. Plant Cell 16: 2307–2322.
    Schopfer CR, Nasrallah ME and Nasrallah JB (1999) The male determinant of self-incompatibility in Brassica. Science 286: 1697–1700.
    Sijacic P, Wang X, Skirpan A et al. (2004) Identification of the pollen determinant of S-RNAase-mediated self-incompatibility. Nature 429: 302–305.
    Snowman BN, Kovar DR, Shevchenko G, Franklin-Tong VE and Staiger CJ (2002) Signal-mediated depolymerization of actin in pollen during the self-incompatibility response. Plant Cell 14: 2613–2626.
    Stein JC, Howlett B, Boyes DC, Nasrallah ME and Nasrallah JB (1991) Molecular cloning of a putative receptor protein kinase gene encoded at the self-incompatibility locus of Brassica oleracea. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 88: 8816–8820.
    Thomas SG and Franklin-Tong VE (2004) Self-incompatibility triggers programmed cell death in Papaver pollen. Nature 429: 305–309.
 Further Reading
    Anderson MA, Cornish EC, Mau S-L et al. (1986) Cloning of cDNA for a stylar glycoprotein associated with expression of self-incompatibility in Nicotiana alata. Nature 321: 38–44.
    Foote HCC, Ride JP, Franklin-Tong VE et al. (1994) Cloning and expression of a distinctive class of self-incompatibility (S) gene from Papaver rhoeas L. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 91: 2265–2269.
    Nasrallah JBK, Kao T-H, Goldberg ML and Nasrallah ME (1985) A cDNA clone encoding an S-locus-specific glycoprotein from Brassica oleracea. Nature 318: 263–267.
    Takayama S and Isogai A (2005) Self-incompatibility in plants. Annual Reviews of Plant Biology 56: 467–489.
Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Franklin‐Tong, Veronica, and Franklin, Christopher(Apr 2007) Self‐incompatibility. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0002041.pub2]