Cell Cycle: Synchronization at Various Stages

Abstract

Progression through, and exit from, the cell cycle are tightly coupled processes that are key to the development and health of multicellular organisms. Synchronization is a technique commonly used to enrich cell populations at a single cell‐cycle stage, enabling the study of cell‐cycle‐specific regulation.

Keywords: mitosis; DNA synthesis; mitotic Spindle; microtubules; checkpoints

Figure 1.

(a) Cells in G1 may decide to exit the cell cycle to enter a quiescent G0 phase or pass the restriction point, progressing through the cell cycle. Cells duplicate their DNA before entering mitosis. (b) Cells in mitosis undergo a series of distinct morphological changes. In prophase, chromatin condenses forming visible chromosomes, centrosomes begin to form the mitotic spindle. During metaphase, chromosomes attach to each pole of the mitotic spindle by connecting their kinetochores to microtubules. In anaphase, the spindle poles begin to move apart separating the chromosomes. Chromosome separation is completed in telophase and cells are separated into two daughters by cytokinesis.

Figure 2.

α‐ and β‐tubulin are the basic subunits of microtubules. α‐tubulin is bound by stable guanosine triphosphate (GTP), β‐tubulin by unstable GTP, which can be hydrolysed to GDP. α‐ and β‐tubulin monomers form a stable heterodimer. Heterodimers make longitudinal contacts forming a protofilament. Thirteen protofilaments make lateral contacts generating a microtubule cylinder. If the plus (+) end of the microtubule is GTP bound (on the β‐tubulin subunits), additional tubulin dimers can be added, once a dimer is incorporated the GTP on β‐tubulin is hydrolysed to GDP. If GTP bound tubulin dimer concentration is low, GTP in the microtubule is hydrolysed. GDP microtubule caps are unstable leading to depolymerization of the microtubule, microtubules peel apart to release tubulin subunits.

close

Further Reading

Blagosklonny MV and Fojo T (1999) Molecular effects of paclitaxel: myths and reality (a critical review). International Journal of Cancer 83: 151–156.

Hammond EM, Green SL and Giaccia AJ (2003) Comparison of hypoxia‐induced replication arrest with hydroxyurea and aphidicolin‐induced arrest. Mutation Research 532: 205–213.

Jordan MA, Thrower D and Wilson L (1992) Effects of vinblastine, podophyllotoxin and nocodazole on mitotic spindles: implications for the role of microtubule dynamics in mitosis. Journal of Cell Science 102: 401–416.

Kufe DW, Egan EM, Rosowsky A, Ensminger W and Frei E (1980) Thymidine arrest and synchrony of cellular growth in vivo. Cancer Treatment Reports 64: 1307–1317.

Lodish H, Baltimore D, Berk A et al. (1995) Molecular Cell Biology, 3rd edn. New York: Scientific American Books.

Martinez‐Botas J, Ferruelo AJ, Suarez Y et al. (2001) Dose‐dependent effects of lovastatin on cell cycle progression. Distinct requirement of cholesterol and non‐sterol mevalonate derivatives. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1532: 185–194.

Murray A and Hunt T (1993) The Cell Cycle: an Introduction, 1st edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Orr GA, Verdier‐Pinard P, McDaid H and Horwitz SB (2003) Mechanisms of taxol resistance related to microtubules. Oncogene 22: 7280–7295.

Pedrali‐Noy G, Spadari S, Miller‐Faures A et al. (1980) Synchronization of HeLa cell cultures by inhibition of DNA polymerase alpha with aphidicolin. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 377–387.

Zieve GW, Turnbull D, Mullins M and McIntosh R (1980) Production of large numbers of mitotic mammalian cells by use of the reversible microtubule inhibitor nococdazole. Experimental Cell Research 126: 397–405.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Tate, Sharon, and Ko Ferrigno, Paul(Jan 2006) Cell Cycle: Synchronization at Various Stages. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1038/npg.els.0002570]