Palaeoecology: Methods

Paleoecology is based on the documentation of occurrences and abundances of taxa across time and space. Although methodologically similar to the techniques of neontological ecologists, the discipline is distinct in its integration of a deeper time axis into our understanding of the processes shaping the earth's ecological patterns. Taphonomy is the study of the processes by which organic remains become incorporated into the fossil record. Since this record is both incomplete and biased, multiple taphonomic approaches have been developed to quantify the reliability of the ecological information it preserves. As such, a fundamental issue in paleoecology relates to the sampling and counting of individuals. Although the nature of the preserving sediments often exerts the primary control on how data are collected, techniques exist to standardize sampling and counting strategies to maximize our ability to detect ecological patterns and gain insight into the processes shaping both ancient and modern communities.

Key Concepts:

  • Paleoecologists study ancient organisms and ecosystem dynamics over evolutionary time scales.
  • Taphonomic studies have shown that the quality of ecological information preserved in the fossil record is high.
  • The preservation potential of organic remains is a function of depositional environment as well as structural, chemical and behavioural characteristics of an organism.
  • Sample standardization is an important consideration for paleoecological data collection and analysis.
  • Biography information: Rebecca C Terry is a paleoecologist and taphonomist with a research focus on small mammal community dynamics through the Holocene.

Keywords: taphonomy; ecology; paleontology; fossils; preservation

Figure 1. History of Phanerozoic diversity and the three ‘evolutionary faunas’ as revealed by a factor analysis of data compiled from the literature. The grey area immediately below the curve for total diversity represents the residual diversity not accommodated by the first three factors in the analysis. The number ‘1750’ in the upper left-hand corner is the approximate number of metazoan families that have been described from the modern oceans. Reproduced from Sepkoski (1981), with permission from The Paleontological Society.
Figure 2. Ecospace utilization analyses showing the changes in the average relative abundances (based on specimen counts) of tiering (a), motility (b) and feeding types (c) between mid-Paleozoic (461–359 Ma) and late Cenozoic (23–0.01 Ma) fossil assemblages. For the two Cenozoic data sets, the 95% error bars represent simple sampling uncertainty, and they were calculated by a two-stage boostrap procedure that resampled (with replacement) both the specimens in each sample and the samples used to calculate each mean, thus adding together the uncertainty generated by both stages of sampling (number of iterations=50 000). For the Paleozoic data (third row), the error bars represent the range of values resulting from different assumptions about the strength of the bias against aragonite preservation. The shaded bars show the bias-simulated results assuming that 40% of the individuals in the average original community were aragonitic. The ‘taphonomic error bars’ encompass the raw data (bases of triangles; assumes no disolution bias) and the bias-simulated data for 70% aragonitic specimens (uncapped ends of lines). The Paleozoic data do not have sampling error bars, but they would be of the same magnitude as those shown for the Cenozoic data. Reproduced from Bush et al. (2007), with permission from the Paleontological Society.
Figure 3. The scales of spatial and temporal averaging in fossil assemblages for different major groups of organisms, in continental (a) and benthic marine (b) depositional settings. Reproduced from Behrensmeyer et al. (2000), with permission from the Paleontological Society.
Figure 4. The taphonomic processes and circumstances that, during the fossilization of organic remains, have potential to modify the original biological signal at different postmortem phases. Reproduced from Behrensmeyer and Kidwell (1985), with permission from the Paleontological Society.
Figure 5. Comparison of average confidence interval (CI) size obtained by collecting more replicate samples versus larger replicate samples at different levels of total sampling effort. Results are shown for four species with different average abundances sampled from a patchy distribution. Reproduced from Bennington and Rutherford (1999), with permission from The Society for Sedimentary Geology.
close
 References
    Andrews P and Nesbit Evans EM (1983) Small mammal bone accumulations produced by mammalian carnivores. Paleobiology 9: 289–307.
    Badgley C (1986) Counting individuals in mammal fossil assemblages from fluvial environments. Palaios 1: 328–338.
    book Bambach RK (1983) "Ecospace utilization and guilds in marine communities through the Phanerozoic". In: Tevesz MJS and McCall PL (eds) Biotic Interactions in Recent and Fossil Benthic Communities, pp. 719–746. New York: Plenum Press.
    book Bambach RK (1985) "Classes and adaptive variety: the ecology of diversification in marine faunas through the Phanerozoic". In: Valentine JW (ed.) Phanerozoic Diversity Patterns: Profiles in Macroevolution, pp. 191–253. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Barnosky AD, Hadly EA and Bell CJ (2003) Mammalian response to global warming on varied temporal scales. Journal of Mammalogy 84: 354–368.
    book Behrensmeyer AK and Dechant Boaz DE (1980) "The recent bones of Amboseli Park, Kenya". In: Behrensmeyer AK and Hill AP (eds) Fossils in the Making, pp. 72–92. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Behrensmeyer AK and Kidwell SM (1985) Taphonomy's contributions to paleobiology. Paleobiology 11: 105–119.
    Behrensmeyer AK, Kidwell SM and Gastaldo RA (2000) Taphonomy and paleobiology. Paleobiology 26(sp4): 103–147.
    Bennington JB and Rutherford SD (1999) Precision and reliability in paleocommunity comparisons based on cluster-confidence intervals: how to get more statistical bang for your sampling buck. Palaios 14: 506–515.
    book Benton MJ (1997) Vertebrate Paleontology. London: Chapman and Hall.
    book Betancourt JL, Van Devender TR and Martin PS (eds) (1990) Packrat Middens: The Last 40 000 Years of Biotic Change. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
    Bottjer DJ and Jablonski D (1988) Paleoenvironmental patterns in the evolution of post-Paleozoic benthic marine invertebrates. Palaios 3: 540–560.
    Boucot AJ (1953) Life and death assemblages among fossils. American Journal of Science 251: 25–40.
    Briggs DEG (2003) The role of decay and mineralization in the preservation of soft-bodied fossils. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Science 31: 275–301.
    Bush AM, Bambach RK and Daley GM (2007) Changes in theoretical ecospace utilization in marine fossil assemblages between the mid-Paleozoic and late Cenozoic. Paleobiology 33(1): 76–97.
    Clementz MT, Hoppe KA and Koch PL (2003) A paleoecological paradox: the habitat and dietary preferences of the extinct tethythere, Desmostylus, inferred from stable isotope analysis. Paleobiology 29: 506–519.
    book Faegri K and Iversen J (1989) Textbook of Pollen Analysis, 4th edn. Chichester: Wiley.
    Faith JT, Marean CW and Behrensmeyer AK (2007) Carnivore competition, bone destruction, and bone density. Journal of Archaeological Science 34: 2025–2034.
    book Foote M and Miller AI (2007) Principles of Paleontology, 3rd edn. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
    Fox-Dobbs K, Bump JK, Peterson RO, Fox DL and Koch PL (2007) Carnivore-specific stable isotope variables and variation in the foraging ecology of modern and ancient wolf populations: case studies from Isle Royale, Minnesota, and La Brea. Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne de Zoologie 85: 458–471.
    Friscia AR, Van Valkenburgh B, Spencer L and Harris J (2008) Chronology and spatial distribution of large mammal bones in PIT 91, Rancho La Brea. Palaios 23: 35–42.
    Gotelli NJ and Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters 4: 379–391.
    Grayson DK (2000) Mammalian responses to middle Holocene climatic change in the Great Basin of the western United States. Journal of Biogeography 27: 181–192.
    Hadly EA (1996) Influence of late-Holocene climate on northern Rocky Mountain mammals. Quaternary Research 46: 298–310.
    Hadly EA (1999) Fidelity of terrestrial vertebrate fossils to a modern ecosystem. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 149: 389–409.
    Hendy AJW (2009) The influence of lithification on Cenozoic marine biodiversity trends. Paleobiology 35: 51–62.
    Holland SM (1995) The stratigraphic distribution of fossils. Paleobiology 21: 92–109.
    Holland SM and Patzkowsky ME (2007) Gradient ecology of a biotic invasion: biofacies of the type Cincinnatian series (Upper Ordovician), Cincinnati, Ohio region, USA. Palaios 22: 392–407.
    Jackson ST (2006) Vegetation, environment, and time: the origination and termination of ecosystems. Journal of Vegetation Science 17: 549–557.
    other Jackson ST (ed.) (2007) Paleoecology: using the past as a key to the future. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Special Issue, 5(4): 455–512.
    Johnson RG (1957) Experiments on the Burial of Shells. Journal of Geology 65: 527–535.
    book Kardong KV (2002) Vertebrates: Comparative Anatomy, Function, Evolution, 3rd edn. Boston: McGraw Hill.
    book Kelley PH, Kowalewski M and Hansen TA (eds) (2003) Predator-Prey Interactions in the Fossil Reocrd. Topics in Geobiology Series 20. New York: Plenum Press/Kluwer.
    Kidwell SM (2001) Preservation of species abundance in marine death assemblages. Science 294: 1091–1094.
    Kidwell SM (2002) Time-averaged molluscan death assemblages: palimpsests of richness, snapshots of abundance. Geology 30: 803–806.
    Kidwell SM (2007) Discordance between living and death assemblages as evidence for anthropogenic ecological change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 104: 17701–17706.
    Kidwell SM and Flessa KW (1996) The quality of the fossil record: populations, species, and communities. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Science 24: 433–464.
    Koch PL, Fisher DC and Dettman D (1989) Oxygen isotope variation in the tusks of extinct proboscideans: a measure of season of death and seasonality. Geology 17: 515–519.
    Kowalewski M, Serrano GEA, Flessa KW and Goodfriend GA (2000) Dead delta's former productivity: two trillion shells at the mouth of the Colorado River. Geology 28(12): 1059–1062.
    book Lyman RL (1994a) Vertebrate Taphonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Lyman RL (1994b) Quantitative units and terminology in zooarchaeology. American Antiquity 59: 36–71.
    Miller AI, Holland SM, Meyer DL and Dattilo BF (2001) The use of faunal gradient analysis for intraregional correlation and assessment of changes in sea-floor topography in the type Cincinnatian. Journal of Geology 109: 603–613.
    Olszewski TD (2004) A unified mathematical framework for the measurement of richness and evenness within and among multiple communities. Oikos 104: 377–387.
    Payne JL, Boyer AG, Brown JH et al. (2009) Two-phase increase in the maximum size of life on Earth over 3.5 billion years reflects biological innovation and environmental opportunity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 106: 24–27.
    Peters SE (2004) Evenness of Cambrian-Ordovician benthic marine communities in North America. Paleobiology 30: 325–346.
    Peters SE and Foote M (2001) Biodiversity in the Phanerozoic: a reinterpretation. Paleobiology 27: 582–601.
    Peterson CH (1977) Paleoecological significance of undetected short-term temporal variability. Journal of Paleontology 51: 976–981.
    Pokines JT and Peterhans JCK (2007) Spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta) den use and taphonomy in the Masai Mara National Reserve, Kenya. Journal of Archaeological Science 34: 1914–1931.
    Powell EN, Parsons-Hubbard KM, Callender WR et al. (2002) Taphonomy on the continental shelf and slope: two-year trends – Gulf of Mexico and Bahamas. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 184: 1–35.
    book Prothero DR (1998) Bringing Fossils to Life. Boston: WBC/McGraw-Hill.
    Raup DM (1975) Taxonomic diversity estimation using rarefaction. Paleobiology 1: 333–342.
    Rensberger JM and Krentz HB (1988) Microscopic effects of predator digestion on the surfaces of bones and teeth. Scanning Microscopy 2: 1541–1551.
    book Rogers RR (1993) "Systematic patterns of time-averaging in the terrestrial vertebrate record: a Cretaceous case study". In: Kidwell SM and Behrensmeyer AK (eds) Taphonomic Approaches to Time Resolution in Fossil Assemblages. Short Courses in Paleontology, No. 6. Knoxville, TN: The Paleontological Society.
    Rountrey AN, Fisher DC, Vartanyan S and Fox DL (2007) Carbon and nitrogen isotope analyses of a juvenile wooly mammoth tusk: evidence of weaning. Quaternary International 169: 166–173.
    Sepkoski JJ Jr. (1978) A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity I. Analysis of marine orders. Paleobiology 4: 223–251.
    Sepkoski JJ Jr. (1979) A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity II. Early Phanerozoic families and multiple equilibria. Paleobiology 5: 222–251.
    Sepkoski JJ Jr. (1981) A factor analytic description of the Phanerozoic marine fossil record. Paleobiology 7: 36–53.
    Sessa JA, Patzkowsky ME and Bralower TJ (2009) The impact of lithification on the diversity, size distribution, and recovery dynamics of marine invertebrate assemblages. Geology 37: 115–118.
    book Shaw AB (1964) Time in Stratigraphy. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.
    book Stanley SM (1993) Exploring Earth and Life through Time. New York: W.H. Freeman and Co.
    Swetnam TW, Allen CD and Betancourt JL (1999) Applied historical ecology: using the past to manage for the future. Ecological Applications 9: 1189–1206.
    Terry RC (2007) Inferring predator identity from skeletal damage of small-mammal prey remains. Evolutionary Ecology Research 9: 199–219.
    Terry RC (2008) Modeling the effects of predation, prey cycling, and time averaging on relative abundance in raptor-derived small-mammal death-assemblages. Palaios 23: 402–410.
    other Terry RC (in press) On raptors and rodents: testing the ecological fidelity of cave death-assemblages through live-dead analysis of skeletal remains. Paleobiology.
    book Valentine JW (1973) Evolutionary Paleoecology of the Marine Biosphere. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Western D and Behrensmeyer AK (2009) Bone assemblages track animal community structure over 40 years in an African savanna ecosystem. Science 324: 1061–1064.
    book Whittaker RH (1975) Communities and Ecosystems, 2nd edn. New York: Macmillan.
    Ziegler AM (1965) Silurian marine communities and their environmental significance. Nature 207: 270–272.
 Further Reading
    book Allison PA and Briggs DEG (eds) (1991) Taphonomy: Releasing the Data Locked in the Fossil Record. New York: Plenum Press.
    DiMichael WA, Behrensmeyer AK and Olszewski TD (2004) Long-term stasis in ecological assemblages: evidence from the fossil record. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35: 285–322.
    book Kowalewski M and Bambach RK (2003) "The limits of paleontological resolution". In: Harries PJ (ed.) High Resolution Approaches in Stratigraphic Paleontology: Topic in Geobiology Series, pp. 1–48. New York: Plenum Press/Kluwer.
    book Magurran AE (2004) Measuring Biological Diversity. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
    book National Research Council (2005) The Geological Record of Ecological Dynamics. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
    book Rogers RR, Eberth DA and Fiorillo AR (2008) Bonebeds: Genesis, Analysis, and Paleobiological Significance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Terry, Rebecca C(Dec 2009) Palaeoecology: Methods. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0003274]