Predation on Animals


The word predator often invokes a vision of a fierce and cruel animal the world would be better without. However, predation is a major ecological process controlling both the structure and function of communities. Predation affects the distribution and abundance of species, the strength and direction of energy flow within a system and the diversity and composition of communities. Predators play an essential role in evolution. Traits that decrease the likelihood of being predated and traits that increase the efficacy of the predating are under strong selection. This process has resulted in a vast array of prey defences and predator counter‐defences. Also, according to recent studies of the fossil record, predation has played a central role in determining the history of life on earth. Thus, predators are not to be viewed as cold‐blooded killers; instead, predation is a critical process for maintaining species diversity in both ecological and evolutionary time.

Key Concepts

  • Predators are animals which actively catch and consume other animals.

  • Predators may be limited in the type of prey they consume; these limitations may be extrinsic, due to factors such as prey abundance, or they may be intrinsic, where the predators’ physiological, reproductive or ecological requirements result in specialization on certain types of prey.

  • Predation is a crucial ecological force because it moves energy through the system.

  • Mathematical models and empirical research illustrate how predators and their prey coexist and should cycle through time.

  • Prey species evolve defences that reduce their vulnerability to predators whereas predators evolve adaptations to counter the defences of the prey.

  • Predator–prey interactions structured ancient, fossil ecosystems and played a role in determining the history of life on earth.

Keywords: population dynamics; community dynamics; prey defence; predator counter defence; predator–prey interactions; coevolution

Figure 1.

Functional responses of predator–prey interactions (a) Type 1, (b) Type 2 and (c) Type 3.

Figure 2.

The prey defence and predator counter‐defence. A warningly coloured wasp is being consumed by a camouflaged crab spider. Reprinted with permission of Jeffrey C Oliver

Figure 3.

Mantids are colour‐limited predators with only one known opsin. However, even with limited visual capabilities they still learn to avoid bright conspicuous prey. Warning coloration is not a signal limited to only birds or other predators with complex visual systems. Mantid photo reprinted with permission of Alex Wild 〈〉. Reprinted with permisison of the Oxford University Press from Prudic et al. .



Abrams PA and Ginzburg LR (2000) The nature of predation. Prey dependent, ratio dependent, or neither? Trends Ecology & Evolution 15: 337–341.

Alatalo RV and Mappes J (1996) Tracking the evolution of warning signals. Nature 382: 485–503.

Ayal Y (2007) Trophic structure and the role of predation in shaping hot desert communities. Journal of Arid Environments 68: 171–187.

Bertram BCR (1978) Living in groups: predator and prey. In: Krebs JR and Davies NB (eds) Behavioural Ecology, pp. 64–96. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

Bond AB and Kamil AC (2006) Spatial heterogeneity, predator cognition, and the evolution of color polymorphism in virtual prey. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 103: 3214–3219.

Bourne GR (1985) The role of profitability in snail kite foraging. Journal of Animal Ecology 54: 697–709.

Brandt M and Mahsberg D (2002) Bugs with a backpack: the function of nymphal camouflage in West African assassin bugs Paredocla and Acanthaspis spp. Animal Behaviour 63: 277–284.

Brower LP (1988) Avian predation on the monarch butterfly and its implications for mimicry theory. American Naturalist 131: S4–S6.

Caro T (1986) The function of stotting in Thomson's gazelles: some tests of the predictions. Animal Behaviour 34: 663–684.

Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF and Hodgson JR (1985) Cascading tropic interactions and lake productivity. Bioscience 35: 634–639.

Chivers DP and Smith RJF (1994) Fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas, acquire predator recognition when alarm substance is associated with the sight of unfamiliar fish. Animal Behaviour 48: 597–605.

Conway Morris S (1998) The Crucible of Creation. The Burgess Shale and the Rise of Animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Curie CR, Scott JA, Summerbell RC and Malloch D (1999) Fungus growing ants use anti‐biotic bacteria to control garden parasites. Nature 398: 701–704.

Downes S (2001) Trading heat and food for safety: costs of predator avoidance in a lizard. Ecology 82: 2870–2881.

Eberhard WB (1980) The natural history and behavior of the bolas spider, Mastophora dizzydeani sp. (Araneae). Psyche 87: 143–170.

Elton C (1924) Periodic fluctuations in the number of animals: their causes and effects. British Journal of Experimental Biology 2: 119–163.

Futuyma DJ and Slatkin M (1983) Coevolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

Gould SJ (1990) Speciation and sorting as the source of evolutionary trends or ‘Things are seldom what they seem’. In: McNamara K (ed.) Evolutionary Trends. London: Belhaven Press.

Gould SJ and Eldredge N (1993) Punctuated equilibrium comes of age. Nature 366: 223–227.

Guzmán‐Novoa E and Page RE (1994) Genetic dominance and worker interactions affect honey bee colony defense. Behavioural Ecology 5: 91–97.

Hassel MP (1978) The Dynamics of Arthropod Predator‐prey Systems. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Holling CS (1965) The functional response of predators to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation. Memorial Entomological Society Canada 45: 5–60.

Huntley JM and Kowalewski M (2007) Strong coupling of predation intensity and diversity in Pharnezoic fossil record. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 104: 15006–15010.

Jablonski D (2000) Micro‐ and macro‐evolution: scale and hierarchy in evolutionary biology and paleobiology. In: Erwin DH and Wing SL (eds) Deep Time: Paleobiology's Perspective. Lawrence, KS: Allen Press.

Kelley PH and Kowalski Hansen TA (eds) (2003) Predator‐prey interactions in the fossil record. Topics in Geobiology, vol. 20, 472pp. New York, NY: Springer.

Krebs CJ, Boutin S, Boonstra R et al. (1995) Impact of food and predation on snowshoe hare cycle. Science 269: 1112–1115.

Lonsdale WM (1999) Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80: 1522–1536.

Lotka AJ (1925) Elements of Biology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.

Paine RT (1966) Food web complexity and species diversity. American Naturalist 100: 65–75.

Polis GA and Strong DR (1996) Food web complexity and community dynamics. American Naturalist 147: 813–846.

Prudic KL, Skemp AK and Papaj DR (2007) Aposematic coloration, luminance contrast and the benefits of conspicuousness. Behavioural Ecologist 18: 41–46.

Rosenzweig ML and McArthur RH (1963) Graphical representation and stability conditions of predator‐prey interactions. American Naturalist 97: 209–223.

Rutz C and Bijlsma RG (2006) Food limitation in a generalist predator. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B 273: 2069–2076.

Schmitz OJ, Hamback PA and Beckerman AP (2000) Trophic cascades in terrestrial systems: a review of the effects of carnivore removal on plants. American Naturalist 155: 141–153.

Sherrif MJ, Krebs CJ and Boonstra R (2009) The sensitive hare: sublethal effects of predator stress on reproduction in snowshoe hares. Journal of Animal Ecology 78(6) : 1249–1258.

Sih A and Christenson B (2001) Optimal diet theory: when does it work and when and why does it fail? Animal Behaviour 61: 379–390.

Sih A, Englund G and Wooster D (1998) Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. Trends in Evolution & Ecology 13: 350–355.

Solomon ME (1949) The natural control of animal populations. Journal of Animal Ecology 18: 1–35.

Sweeney BW and Vannote RL (1982) Population synchrony in mayflies: a predator satiation hypothesis. Evolution 36: 810–821.

Townsend CR (1996) Invasion biology and ecological impacts of brown trout Salmo trutta in New Zealand. Biological Conservation 78: 13–22.

Vermeij GV (1994) The evolutionary interaction among species: selection, interaction and coevolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 25: 219–236.

Vermeij GV (2002) The geography of evolutionary opportunity: hypothesis and two cases in gastropods. Integrative and Comparative Biology 42: 935–940.

Volterra V (1926) Variations and fluctuations of the number of individuals of animal species living together. In: Chapman RN (ed.) Animal Ecology. New York: McGraw‐Hill.

Whitfield DP (1990) Individual feeding specializations of winter turnstones Arenaria interpres. Journal of Animal Ecology 59: 193–211.

Wise KK, Conover MR and Knowlton FF (1999) Response of coyotes to avian distress calls: testing the startle‐predator and predator attraction hypotheses. Behaviour 136: 935–949.

Yoshida T, Jones LE, Ellner SP, Fussman GF and Hairston NG (2003) Rapid evolution drives ecological dynamics in a predator prey system. Nature 424: 303–306.

Zhang H, Georgescu P and Chen L (2008) On the impulsive controllability and bifurcation of a predator–pest model of IPM. Biosystems 93: 151–171.

Future Reading

Barbosa P and Castellanos I (eds) (2005) The Ecology of Predator Prey Interactions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ruxton GE, Sherratt TN and Speed MP (2004) Avoiding Attack: The Evolutionary Ecology of Crypsis, Warning Signals and Mimicry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Turchin P (2003) Complex Population Dynamics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Vermeij GV (1993) Evolution and Escalation: An Ecological History of Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Prudic, Kathleen L(Dec 2009) Predation on Animals. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0003284]