Fitness: Philosophical Problems

A philosophical discussion of conceptual and theoretical issues raised by the scientific use of the term ‘fitness’ to describe a property of evolving systems.

Keywords: fitness; tautology; Social Darwinism; propensity

 Further Reading
    Cody M (1966) A general theory of clutch size. Evolution 20: 174–184.
    book Darwin C (1869) On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. New York: D Appleton.
    Gould SJ and Lewontin R (1979) The spandrels of San Marco and the panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B205: 581–598.
    Mills S and Beatty J (1979) The propensity interpretation of fitness. Philosophy of Science 46: 263–288.
    book Popper K (1963) Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    Scriven M (1959) Explanation and prediction in evolutionary theory. Science 130: 477–482.
    book Sober E (1993) Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    book Spenser H (1866) The Principles of Biology. New York: D Appleton.
    book Sterelny K and Griffiths PE (1999) Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    book Thoday JM (1958) "Natural selection and biological progress". In: Barnett SA (ed.) A Century of Darwin, pp. 313–334. London: Heinemann.
Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Maclaurin, James B(Apr 2001) Fitness: Philosophical Problems. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1038/npg.els.0003443]