Evolutionary Progress: Conceptual Issues

Abstract

Perhaps no idea has proven more controversial within evolutionary biology than the idea that evolution manifests progress. To some biologists evidence of progress in the history of life has seemed undeniable. From utterly simple beginnings have come organisms of astounding complexity and sophistication. But to others the hazy notion of evolutionary progress appears distinctly unscientific inasmuch as it is thought to require subjective value judgements that have no place in a science based squarely on empirical facts. Debates over evolutionary progress can be substantially, albeit not entirely, resolved by examining some of the assumptions underlying such debates and by attending more carefully to the definition of key concepts such as ‘direction’ and ‘improvement’. Doing so suggests that acceptance of a moderate form of evolutionary progress can accommodate evidence from the history of life while satisfying standards of scientific objectivity.

Key Concepts:

  • The concept of ‘progress’ has been controversial within evolutionary biology.

  • Resolving disagreements about evolutionary progress requires careful examination of theoretical, empirical and conceptual issues.

  • Evolutionary progress may be defined as intergenerational directional change embodying improvement in the properties characterising a population of biological entities.

  • A process has a direction over a given time interval if the value of one of its properties increases during that time interval.

  • Directional change, which is an observable fact, must be distinguished from directionality, that is, a tendency to change in a specific direction.

  • It is important to distinguish uniform, net and apex directional change.

  • Critics of the idea of evolutionary progress complain that ‘improvement’ is a value‐laden term that cannot be given an objective scientific definition.

  • Improvement in the evolutionary sense is any directional change that contributes to the solution of a problem facing biological entities in a particular environment.

  • A number of biologists, beginning with Darwin, have argued that evolution manifests progress in the sense defined here.

  • If the ability of organisms in even one lineage to cope with some problem impacting their chances for survival and reproduction has improved over some time interval, then evolutionary progress, at least in this limited sense, is a scientific fact.

Keywords: progress; evolution; direction; directionality; improvement

References

Calcott B and Sterelny K (eds) (2011) The Major Transitions of Evolution Revisited. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Darwin C (1859) On the Origin of Species. London: John Murray.

Dawkins R (1996) Climbing Mount Improbable. New York: W. W. Norton.

Dawkins R (1997) Human chauvinism. Evolution 51(3): 1015–1020.

Gould SJ (1988) On replacing the idea of progress with an operational notion of directionality. In: Nitecki M (ed.) Evolutionary Progress, pp. 319–338. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Huxley JS (1942) Evolution: The Modern Synthesis. London: Allen & Unwin.

Maynard Smith J and Szathmáry E (1995) The Major Transitions in Evolution. Oxford: Freeman/Spektrum.

McShea DW and Brandon RN (2010) Biology's First Law: The Tendency for Diversity & Complexity to Increase in Evolutionary Systems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Miele F (1995) Darwin's dangerous disciple. Skeptic 3: 80–86.

Provine WB (1988) Progress in evolution and meaning in life. In: Nitecki M (ed.) Evolutionary Progress, pp. 49–74. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Shanahan T (1999) Evolutionary progress from Darwin to Dawkins. Endeavour 23(4): 171–174.

Shanahan T (2000) Evolutionary progress? BioScience 50(5): 451–459.

Shanahan T (2001) Methodological and contextual factors in the Dawkins/Gould dispute over evolutionary progress. Studies in the History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32(1): 127–151.

Shanahan T (2004) The Evolution of Darwinism: Selection, Adaptation, and Progress in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Further Reading

Ayala F (1988) Can ‘progress’ be defined as a biological concept? In: Nitecki M (ed.) Evolutionary Progress, pp. 75–96. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Bonner JT (1988) The Evolution of Complexity by Means of Natural Selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Conway Morris S (2003) Life's Solution: Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gould SJ (1996) Full House: The Spread of Excellence from Plato to Darwin. New York: Harmony Books.

Hull DL (1988) Progress in ideas of progress. In: Nitecki M (ed.) Evolutionary Progress, pp. 27–48. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Ruse M (1996) Monad to Man: The Concept of Progress in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Simpson GG (1974) The concept of progress in organic evolution. Social Research 41: 28–51.

Sober E (1994) Progress and direction in evolution. In: Campbell JH and Schopf JW (eds) Creative Evolution, pp. 19–33. Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Shanahan, Timothy(Jul 2012) Evolutionary Progress: Conceptual Issues. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0003459.pub2]