References
Andrade MCB
(1996)
Sexual selection for male sacrifice in the Australian Redback spider.
Science
271:
70–72.
Arnqvist G and
Nilsson T
(2000)
The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects.
Animal Behaviour
60:
145–164.
Arnqvist G and
Rowe L
(2002)
Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects.
Nature
415:
787–789.
Arnqvist G and
Rowe L
(2005)
Sexual Conflict.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bateman AJ
(1948)
Intra‐sexual selection in Drosophila.
Heredity
2:
349–368.
Bonduriansky R and
Chenoweth SF
(2009)
Intralocus sexual conflict.
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
24:
280–288.
Brommer JE,
Kirkpatrick M,
Qvarnstrom A et al.
(2007)
The intersexual genetic correlation for lifetime fitness in the wild and its implications for sexual selection.
PLoS ONE
2:
e744.
Chapman T,
Liddle LF,
Kalb JM et al.
(1995)
Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products.
Nature
373:
241–244.
Chippindale AK,
Gibson JR and
Rice WR
(2001)
Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between the sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA
98:
1671–1675.
Connallon T,
Cox RM and
Calsbeek R
(2010)
Fitness consequences of sex‐specific selection.
Evolution
64:
1671–1682.
Cox RM and
Calsbeek R
(2009)
Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism, and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict.
American Naturalist
173:
176–187.
Crudgington HS and
Siva‐Jothy MT
(2000)
Genital damage, kicking and early death.
Nature
407:
855–856.
Darwin CR
(1871)
The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, 2nd edn.
London, UK: John Murray.
Ebensperger LA
(1998)
Strategies and Counterstrategies to Infanticide in Mammals.
Biological Reviews
73:
321–346.
Eberhard WG and
Cordero C
(2003)
Sexual conflict and female choice.
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
18:
438–439.
Fisher RA
(1930)
The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection.
Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Foerster K,
Coulson T,
Sheldon BC et al.
(2007)
Sexually antagonistic genetic variation for fitness in red deer.
Nature
447:
1107–1109.
Fricke C,
Bretman A and
Chapman T
(2009)
Female nutritional status determines the magnitude and sign of responses to a male ejaculate signal in Drosophila melanogaster.
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
23:
157–165.
Gavrilets S and
Hayashi TI
(2006)
The dynamics of two‐ and three‐way sexual conflicts over mating.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B
361:
345–354.
Hardin G
(1968)
The tragedy of the commons.
Science
162:
1243–1248.
Holland B and
Rice WR
(1998)
Chase‐away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance.
Evolution
52:
1–7.
Hosken DJ,
Stockley P,
Tregenza T et al.
(2009)
Monogamy and the battle of the sexes.
Annual Review of Entomology
54:
361–378.
Houston AI,
Szekely T and
McNamara JM
(2005)
Conflict between parents over care.
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
20:
33–38.
Innocenti P and
Morrow EH
(2010)
The sexually antagonistic genes of Drosophila melanogaster.
PLoS Biology
8:
e1000335.
Iwasa Y and
Pomiankowski A
(1995)
Continual change in mate preferences.
Nature
377:
420–422.
Kamimura Y
(2007)
Twin intromittent organs of Drosophila for traumatic insemination.
Biology Letters
3:
401–404.
Kirkpatrick M
(1996)
Good genes and direct selection in the evolution of mating preferences.
Evolution
50:
2125–2140.
Lande R
(1980)
Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters.
Evolution
34:
292–305.
Lande R and
Kirkpatrick M
(1988)
Ecological speciation by sexual selection.
Journal of Theoretical Biology
133:
85–98.
Long TAF and
Rice WR
(2007)
Adult locomotory activity mediates intralocus sexual conflict in a laboratory‐adapted population of Drosophila melanogaster.
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B
274:
3105–3112.
Otto SP and
Lenormand T
(2002)
Resolving the paradox of sex and recombination.
Nature Reviews. Genetics
3:
252–261.
Parker GA
(1979)
Sexual selection and sexual conflict.
In: MS Blum and
NA Blum (eds)
Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects,
pp. 123–166.
New York: Academic Press.
Parker GA,
Barker RR and
Smith VGF
(1972)
The origin and evolution of gamete dimorphism and the male–female phenomenon.
Journal of Theoretical Biology
36:
529–553.
Pischedda A and
Chippindale AK
(2006)
Intralocus sexual conflict diminishes the benefits of sexual selection.
PLoS Biology
4:
2099–2103.
Poissant J,
Wilson AJ and
Coltman DW
(2010)
Sex‐specific genetic variance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a systematic review of cross‐sex genetic correlations.
Evolution
64:
97–107.
Puniamoorthy N,
Su KF‐Y and
Meier R
(2008)
Bending for love: losses and gains of sexual dimorphisms are strictly correlated with changes in the mounting position of sepsid flies (Sepsidae: Diptera).
BMC Evolutionary Biology
8:
155.
Reinhardt K and
Siva‐Jothy MT
(2007)
Biology of the bed bugs (Cimididae).
Annual Review of Entomology
52:
351–374.
Rezac M
(2009)
The spider Harpactea sadistica: co‐evolution of traumatic insemination and complex female genital morphology in spiders.
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B
276:
2697–2701.
Rice WR
(1984)
Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism.
Evolution
38:
735–742.
Rönn J,
Katvala M and
Arnqvist G
(2007)
Coevolution between harmful male genitalia and female resistance in seed beetles.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA
104:
10921–10925.
Rowe L,
Arnqvist G,
Sih A et al.
(1994)
Sexual conflict and the evolutionary ecology of mating patterns – water striders as a model system.
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
9:
289–293.
Rowe L and
Day T
(2006)
Detecting sexual conflict and sexually antagonistic coevolution.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B
361:
277–285.
Tatarnic NJ,
Cassis G and
Hochuli DF
(2006)
Traumatic insemination in the plant bug genus Coridromius Signoret (Heteroptera: Miridae).
Biology Letters
2:
58–61.
Trivers RL
(1972)
Parental investment and sexual selection.
In: B Campbell (ed.)
Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971,
pp. 136–179.
Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.
Wigby S and
Chapman T
(2005)
Sex peptide causes mating costs in female Drosophila melanogaster.
Current Biology
15:
316–321.
Wilder SM,
Rypstra AL and
Elgar MA
(2009)
The importance of ecological and phylogenetic conditions for the occurrence and frequency of sexual cannibalism.
Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics
40:
21–39.
Wolfner MF
(1997)
Tokens of love: functions and regulation of Drosophila male accessory gland products.
Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
27:
179–192.
