Multidomain Proteins

Protein domains that have a necessary function are often used in many different proteins. Protein architecture has evolved to utilize a large set of such domains in forming the thousands of different proteins necessary for any living organism. Simple proteins normally contain only one or a few domains, while larger proteins may have incorporated more than 30 domains needed for the more complex cellular functions.

Keywords: protein structure; domain; module; evolution; protein databases

Figure 1. The sizes of protein structures. Protein subunits are usually 10 kDa or larger. Modules have sizes below 80 amino acids. Domains vary more in size, depending on how they are defined. A size scale permits comparison for both the number of amino acids in a protein and its size in kDa. Simple enzymes have only a single type of catalytic activity, and are not subject to sophisticated regulatory controls. Complex enzymes are always larger, and may contain two or more catalytic centers, and frequently have additional binding sites for one or more regulatory effectors.
Figure 2. Sizes of human proteins.
Figure 3. A model for the evolution of new proteins. Modules, at an average size of 50 amino acids, are coded by exons, and are large enough to have tertiary structure. Domains, at an average size of 150 amino acids, are formed by two or more modules. Simple enzymes generally are formed by one domain. Gene duplication leads to copies for some enzymes, which become altered by mutation and selection if a new or better activity evolves. Fusion of two or more genes leads to multidomain proteins with multiple activities.
Figure 4. Examples of proteins with various assortments of modules or domains. Domains or modules are identified and their size in amino acids is in parentheses. A number following a domain element denotes the frequency of repetition for that domain. SH: Sarc homology; THSP: thrombospondin: VWA: von Willebrand factor type A.
Figure 5. Model for the structure of fatty acid synthetase. Each subunit of the protein dimer contains the separate protein domains: KS: -ketoacyl synthetase; MT: malonyl transacylase; AT: acetyl transferase; DH: dehydratase; ER: enoyl reductase; KR: -ketoacyl reductase; ACP: acyl carrier protein; TE: thioesterase.
Figure 6. Reactions catalyzed by the bifunctional OPET decarboxylase/HHDD isomerase. OPET: 5-oxopent-3-ene-1,2,5-tricarboxylate; HHDD: 2-hydroxyhepta-2,4-diene-1,7-dioate; OHED: 2-oxohept-3-enedioate.
close
 References
    Baron M, Norman DG and Campbell ID (1991) Protein modules. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 16: 13–17.
    Bork P (1991) Shuffled domains in extracellular proteins. FEBS Letters 286: 47–53.
    Doolittle RF and Bork P (1993) Evolutionary mobile modules in proteins. Scientific American 269: 50–56.
    Janin J and Wodak SJ (1983) Structural domains in proteins and their role in the dynamics of protein function. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 42: 21–78.
    Lesk AM and Chothia C (1984) Mechanisms of domain closure in proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology 174: 175–191.
    Matthews BW and Rossmann MG (1985) Comparison of protein structures. Methods in Enzymology 115: 397–421.
    Rose GD (1985) Automatic recognition of domains in globular proteins. Methods in Enzymology 115: 430–440.
    Sonnhammer ELL and Kahn D (1994) Modular arrangement of proteins as inferred from analysis of homology. Protein Science 3: 482–492.
    Traut TW (1994) The functions and consensus motifs of nine types of peptide segments that form different types of nucleotide-binding sites. European Journal of Biochemistry 222: 9–19.
    Yablonski MJ, Pasek DA, Han B-D, Jones ME and Traut TW (1996) Intrinsic activity and stability of bifunctional UMP synthase, and of its two separate domains, orotate phosphoribosyltransferase and orotidine-5¢-phosphate decarboxylase. Journal of Biological Chemistry 271: 10704–10708.
 Further Reading
    Bennett WS and Huber R (1984) Structural and functional aspects of domain motions in proteins. CRC Critical Reviews in Biochemistry 15: 290–384.
    Corpet F, Servant F, Gouzy J and Kahn D (2000) ProDom and ProDom-CG: tools for protein domain analysis and whole genome comparisons. Nucleic Acids Research 28: 267–269.
    Doolittle RF (1995) The multiplicity of domains in proteins. Annual Review of Biochemistry 64: 287–314.
    Etzold T, Ulyanov A and Argos P (1996) SRS: information retrieval system for molecular biology data banks. Methods in Enzymology 266: 114.
    Richardson JS (1981) The anatomy and taxonomy of protein structure. Advances in Protein Chemistry 34: 167–339.
    Traut TW (1988) Do exons code for structural or functional units in proteins? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 85: 2944–2948.
Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Traut, Thomas(Sep 2005) Multidomain Proteins. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1038/npg.els.0005053]