Human Cloning: Legal Aspects
Christopher A Pynes, Western Illinois University, Macomb, Illinois, USA
Published online: December 2009
Human cloning debates fall into two broad categories: reproductive and therapeutic. Both varieties of human cloning have important
legal aspects from ownership of genetic material, stem cell research, the dignity and respect for human life, reproductive
rights of individuals, among other things, to the rights of potentially cloned individuals. Two basic facts complicate the
legal issues with cloning: the biological technology needed to achieve human cloning can be found in most good labs, and writing
and enforcing laws on either kind of human cloning is difficult to achieve. And even though there is a general consensus about
the need to ban reproductive cloning in the world community, the views concerning therapeutic cloning are varied and have
complicated the legal matters internationally and in individual nations. It is certain that regulations will continue to change
at a rate slower than the biological technology.
Reproductive cloning is cloning where the live birth of another individual is intended, and has been consistently opposed
by all government and most individuals.
Therapeutic cloning is cloning for purposes other than the live birth of an individual, and has seen support by some governments
and many individuals.
UNESCO or the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization which functions as a mechanism that attempts
to gain universal agreements on emerging ethical issues related to science and education.
The UK has a clear prohibition on reproductive human cloning, but works to keep laws current with and relevant to technological
The EU supports funding for embryonic stem cell research, but has banned human cloning.
The USA has a complex mix of state and federal regulations and interlocutors often conflate the cloning issues with the abortion
debate, which gives rise to strong objections to both types of cloning and to stem cell research.
Keywords: cloning; law; human rights; international regulation; genetics
Council of Europe
(1997) Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and the Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: On the Prohibition of Cloning Human Beings. Strasbourg, Published by the Council of Europe, France (http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/Html/168.htm).
(2000) Opinion of the European Group on Ethics in Science and the New technologies, Opinion No. 15, Paris, 14 November. Reprinted in European Commission Research Directorate‐General, Survey of opinions from National Ethics Committees or similar bodies in relation to Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research and Use (ed., Line Matthiessen), vol. 1, EU Member States.
(2007) ‘Overview of World Human Cloning Policies’ Version 1.7: 3 August. http://cnx.org/content/m74834/1.1.
(1990) Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. London, UK: HMSO. ISBN 0‐10‐543790‐0. http://www.opsi.gov.uk/Acts/acts1990/ukpga_19900037_en_1.htm
(2001) Human Reproductive Cloning Act 2001. London, UK. http://www.opsi.gov.uk/Acts/Acts2001/ukpga_20010023_en_1.htm
United Nations Declaration
A/59/516/Add.1, 22 August
Pattinson S and
Haker H (eds)
The Ethics of Genetics in Human Procreation.
Regulating the reproduction business.
Medical Law Review
Stem cells, superman and the report of the select committee.
Modern Law Review
(2003) Human cloning laws, human dignity and the poverty of the policy making dialogue in BMC Medical Ethics 4:3. DOI: 10.1186/1472‐6939‐4‐3.
Lebacqz K and
Zoloth L (eds)
The human embryonic stem cells debate.
Science, Ethics and Public Policy.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Science, medicine and ethical change.
In: Bainham A,
Day‐Sclater S and
Richards M (eds)
Body Lore and Body Laws,
Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.
Cloning as a reproductive right.
In: McGee G (ed.)
The Human Cloning Debate,
Berkley, CA: Berkley Hills Books.
Ruse M and
Aryne S (eds)
Cloning: Responsible Science or Technomadness?
Amberst, NY: Prometheus Books.
Ruse M and
Christopher AP (eds)
The Stem Cell Debate,
Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
(2007) Is Human Reproductive Cloning Inevitable: Future Options for UN Governance.