Insurance and Genetic Information

With the accelerating pace of genetic technology comes increased opportunity for individuals to obtain additional risk estimates about their susceptibilities to disease. Insurers argue that they need to have access to any information that predicts disease risk because the amount that policyholders pay for insurance coverage is determined by assessing their level of risk. Without access to genetic information, insurers are concerned that individuals may purchase more insurance at unadjusted premiums, which may lead to the collapse of the market. However, people are reluctant to share genetic test results with insurers due to the potential risk of insurance discrimination. As genetic testing becomes more prevalent, there are concerns that sections of the population will be denied insurance because of their genetic profiles. The question of what governments should do about this is one that has been debated in many countries.

Key concept:

  • Despite the public's fear of insurance discrimination, insurers argue that genetic health information should be shared with them to enable underwriters to make an accurate assessment of the risk.

Keywords: genetic information; genetic testing; insurance; discrimination; ethics; public policy

Figure 1. Schema representing the concept of adverse selection using Huntington disease (HD) as an example. Adapted with permission from Armstrong et al. (2003) of Wiley-Liss, a subsidiary of Wiley.
close
 References
    Anderlik MR and Rothstein MA (2001) Privacy and confidentiality of genetic information: what rules for the new science? Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 2: 401–433.
    Apse KA, Biesecker BB, Giardiello FM, Fuller BP and Bernhardt BA (2004) Perceptions of genetic discrimination among at-risk relatives of colorectal cancer patients. Genetics in Medicine 6: 510–516.
    Armstrong K, Weber B, FitzGerald G et al. (2003) Life insurance and breast cancer risk assessment: adverse selection, genetic testing decisions, and discrimination. American Journal of Medical Genetics 120A: 359–364.
    Billings PR, Kohn MA, de Cuevas M et al. (1992) Discrimination as a consequence of genetic testing. American Journal of Human Genetics 50: 476–482.
    ePath Blackburn-Starza A (2008) UK Moratorium on Use of Genetic Data Extended Until 2014. Bionews, 16 June: 462. Available at http://www.bionews.org.uk/page_13416.asp (accessed in January 2010).
    Bombard Y, Penziner E, Decolongon J et al. (2007) Managing genetic discrimination: strategies used by individuals found to have the Huntington disease mutation. Clinical Genetics 71: 220–231.
    Bombard Y, Penziner E, Suchowersky O et al. (2008) Engagement with genetic discrimination: concerns and experiences in the context of Huntington disease. European Journal of Human Genetics 16: 279–289.
    Bombard Y, Veenstra G, Friedman JM et al., Canadian Respond-HD Collaborative Research Group (2009) Perceptions of genetic discrimination among people at risk for Huntington's disease: a cross sectional survey. British Medical Journal 338: b2175.
    book Gerards JH, Heringa A-W and Janssen HL (2005) Genetic Discrimination and Genetic Privacy in Comparative Perspective. Antwerp, Belgium: Intersentia.
    Hadley DW, Jenkins J, Dimond E et al. (2003) Genetic counseling and testing in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Archives of Internal Medicine 163: 573–582.
    Hall MA, McEwen JE, Barton JC et al. (2005) Concerns in a primary care population about genetic discrimination by insurers. Genetics in Medicine 7: 311–316.
    Hall MA and Rich SS (2000) Laws restricting health insurers’ use of genetic information: impact on genetic discrimination. American Journal of Human Genetics 66: 293–307.
    Hoy M and Witt J (2007) Welfare effects of banning genetic information in the life insurance market: the case of BRCA1/2 genes. Journal of Risk & Insurance 74: 523–546.
    Kass NE, Medley AM, Natowicz MR et al. (2007) Access to health insurance: experiences and attitudes of those with genetic versus nongenetic medical conditions. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 143A: 707–717.
    Lapham EV, Kozma C and Weiss JO (1996) Genetic discrimination: perspectives of consumers. Science 274: 621–624.
    Lemmens T (2003) Genetics and insurance discrimination: comparative legislative, regulatory and policy developments and Canadian options. Health Law Journal 41–86. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=495404.
    book Lemmens T, Lacroix M and Mykitiuk R (2007) Reading the Future? Legal and Ethical Challenges of Predictive Genetic Testing. Montreal, Canada: Themis Press.
    book Lemmens T and Thiery Y (2007) "Insurance and human rights: what can Europe learn from Canadian discrimination law"? In: Cousy H and Van Schoubroeck C (eds) Discriminatie in Verzekering/Discrimination et Assurance, pp. 253–294. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=963696 (accessed in January 2010) Antwerp, Belgium: MAKLU-Academia Bruylant.
    Low L, King S and Wilkie T (1998) Genetic discrimination in life insurance: empirical evidence from a cross-sectional survey of genetic support groups in the United Kingdom. British Medical Journal 317: 1632–1635.
    MacDonald AS (1999) Modeling the impact of genetics on insurance. North American Actuarial Journal 3: 83–105.
    ePath National Council on State Legislatures (2008) Genetics and Health Insurance State Anti-Discrimination Laws. Available at http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=14374 (accessed on 26 October 2009).
    Ostrer H, Allen W, Crandall LA et al. (1993) Insurance and genetic testing: where are we now? American Journal of Human Genetics 52: 565–577.
    Peterson EA, Milliron KJ, Lewis KE, Goold SD and Merajver SD (2002) Health insurance and discrimination concerns and BRCA1/2 testing in a clinic population. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention 11: 79–87.
    Tan MH (2009) Advancing civil rights, the next generation: the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 and beyond. Health Matrix 19(1): 63–119.
    Taylor S, Treloar S, Barlow-Stewart K, Stranger M and Otlowski M (2008) Investigating genetic discrimination in Australia: a large-scale survey of clinical genetics clients. Clinical Genetics 74: 20–30.
    Zick CD, Mathews CJ, Roberts S et al. (2005) Genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease and its impact on insurance purchasing behavior. Health Affairs 24: 483–490.
    Zick CD, Smith KR, Mayer RN and Botkin JR (2000) Genetic testing, adverse selection, and the demand for life insurance. American Journal of Medical Genetics 93: 29–39.
 Further Reading
    book Abraham KA (1986) Distributing Risk: Insurance, Legal Theory and Public Policy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    Bornstein RA (1996) Genetic discrimination, insurability and legislation: a closing of the legal loopholes. Journal of Law and Policy 4: 551–563.
    Evans JP, Skrzynia C and Burke W (2001) The complexities of predictive genetic testing. British Medical Journal 322: 1052–1056.
    book McGleenan T, Wiesing U and Ewald F (1999) Genetics and Insurance. Oxford, UK: BIOS Scientific.
    book Rothstein M (ed.) (2004) Genetics and Life Insurance: Medical Underwriting and Social Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Warren V (2001) Genetics and insurance: a possible solution. British Medical Journal 322: 1060.
 Web Links
    ePath Genetics and Insurance Committee, United Kingdom. Available at http://www.dh.gov.uk/ab/GAIC/index.htm (accessed in January 2010).
    ePath Human Genetics Commission (HGC) (2000) Access to Consultation Paper: Whose Hands on Your Genes? London. Available at http://www.hgc.gov.uk (accessed in January 2010).
    ePath National Council on State Legislatures. Available at http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=14374 (accessed in January 2010).
Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Bombard, Yvonne, and Lemmens, Trudo(Apr 2010) Insurance and Genetic Information. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0005203.pub2]