Many methods exist to analyze the linkage of traits to genetic marker data, and various software packages are available to implement these methods.
Keywords: parametric; model-free; binary trait; quantitative trait; LOD score
Peter Holmans, Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK
Published online: January 2006
DOI: 10.1038/npg.els.0005406
Many methods exist to analyze the linkage of traits to genetic marker data, and various software packages are available to implement these methods.
Keywords: parametric; model-free; binary trait; quantitative trait; LOD score
| References | |
| Abreu P, Greenberg D and Hodge S (1999) Direct power comparisons between simple LOD scores and NPL scores for linkage analysis in complex disease. American Journal of Human Genetics 65: 847857. | |
| Bhat A, Heath SC and Ott J (1999) Heterogeneity for multiple disease loci in linkage analysis. Human Heredity 49: 229231. | |
| Blangero J, Williams JT and Almasy L (2001) Variance component methods for detecting complex trait loci. Advances in Genetics 42: 151181. | |
| Cox NJ, Frigge M, Nicolae DL, et al. (1999) Loci on chromosomes 2 (NIDDM1) and 15 interact to increase susceptibility to diabetes in Mexican Americans. Nature Genetics 21: 213215. | |
| Davis S and Weeks DE (1997) Comparison of nonparametric statistics for detection of linkage in nuclear families: single-marker evaluation. American Journal of Human Genetics 61: 14311444. | |
| Elston RC, Buxbaum S, Jacobs KB and Olson JM (2000) Haseman and Elston revisited. Genetic Epidemiology 19: 117. | |
| Greenwood CMT and Bull SB (1999) Downweighting of multiple affected sib pairs leads to biased likelihood-ratio tests, under the assumption of no linkage. American Journal of Human Genetics 64: 12481252. | |
| Holmans P (2001) Likelihood-ratio affected sib-pair tests applied to multiply-affected sibships: issues of power and type I error rate. Genetic Epidemiology 20: 4456. | |
| Knapp M, Seuchter SA and Baur MP (1994) Linkage analysis in nuclear families. II. Relationship between affected sib-pair tests and lod score analysis. Human Heredity 44: 4451. | |
| Weeks DE and Lange K (1988) The affected-pedigree-member method of linkage analysis. American Journal of Human Genetics 42: 315326. | |
| Whittemore AS and Halpern J (1994) Probability of gene identity by descent: computation and applications. Biometrics 50: 109117. | |
| Further Reading | |
| Blackwelder WC and Elston RC (1985) A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci. Genetic Epidemiology 2: 8597. | |
| Haseman JK and Elston RC (1972) The investigation of linkage between a quantitative trait and a marker locus. Behavior Genetics 2: 319. | |
| book Ott J (1991) Analysis of Human Genetic Linkage, revised edn. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. | |
| Risch N (1990) Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. II. The power of affected relative pairs. American Journal of Human Genetics 46: 229241. | |
| Risch N (1990) Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. III. The effect of marker polymorphism on analysis of affected relative pairs. American Journal of Human Genetics 46: 242253. | |
| Schork NJ, Boehnke M, Terwilliger JD and Ott J (1993) Two-trait-locus linkage analysis: a powerful strategy for mapping complex genetic traits. American Journal of Human Genetics 53: 11271136. | |
| Strauch K, Fimmers R, Kurz T, et al. (2000) Parametric and non-parametric multipoint linkage analysis with imprinting and two-locus trait models: application to mite sensitization. American Journal of Human Genetics 66: 19451957. | |
| book Terwilliger JD and Ott J (1994) Handbook of Human Genetic Linkage. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. | |
| Web Links | |
| ePath Rockefeller University. Comprehensive list of linkage software packages, together with details of availability, and references http://linkage.rockefeller.edu | |