Migration

Abstract

Migration is the movement of individuals in geographic space. When that movement has genetic consequences, migration determines gene flow. By introducing new genes where they were previously absent, migration increases genetic diversity within populations and reduces the differences among them. As a rule, groups that dwell close to each other tend to exchange more migrants than distant or isolated groups. But there are exceptions, especially during demographic expansions and when the populations are subdivided by geographic or cultural barriers. Rates and patterns of migration can be reconstructed from the analysis of genetic data.

Keywords: gene flow; genetic diversity; island model; stepping‐stone model; isolation by distance; clines; barriers; demic diffusion

Figure 1.

Model of unidirectional migration. Thick dashed arrows represent migration and thin solid arrows represent the effects of inheritance.

Figure 2.

Scheme of Wright's island model. p1, p2,…, p5 are the (different) frequencies of one allele in the five subpopulations shown, and m is the rate of migration, which is the same between all subpopulations. The black dot represents the temporary gene pool formed by the emigrants, before they immigrate into their final subpopulation.

Figure 3.

Two‐dimensional stepping‐stone model of population structure. Each black dot represents a subpopulation, which exchanges with each of its four neighbors the same fraction (m) of migrants at each generation.

Figure 4.

Examples of simulated genealogies for eight genes from a population subdivided into two isolates; genes sampled in either isolate are indicated by open circles and solid circles respectively. (a, b) Two realizations in which isolates exchange migrants with high probability, approximating panmixia; (c, d) two realizations in which isolates exchange migrants with low probability. In all examples, population sizes were the same initially, and increased exponentially through time. In (d), the second sequence from the left suggests migration from the ‘white’ into the ‘black’ subpopulation.

close

References

Beerli P and Felsenstein J (1999) Maximum‐likelihood estimation of migration rates and effective population numbers in two populations using a coalescent approach. Genetics 152: 763–773.

Cavalli‐Sforza LL, Menozzi P and Piazza A (1994) The History and Geography of Human Genes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Donnelly P (1996) Interpreting genetic variability: the effects of shared evolutionary history. Ciba Foundation Symposium 197: 25–50.

Kimura M and Weiss GH (1964) The stepping‐stone model of population structure and the decrease of genetic correlation with distance. Genetics 106: 293–308.

Long JC (1991) The genetic structure of admixed populations. Genetics 127: 417–428.

Morton NE (1981) Kinship and inbreeding in populations of Middle Eastern origin and controls. In: Crawford MH and Mielke J (eds) Current Developments in Anthropological Genetics: Ecology and Population Structure, pp. 449–466. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

Reich DE and Goldstein DB (1998) Genetic evidence for a Paleolithic human population expansion in Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 95: 8119–8123.

Renfrew C and Boyle K (2001) Archaeogenetics: DNA and the Population Prehistory of Europe. McDonald Institute Monographs. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Sokal RR, Oden NL, Walker J, Di Giovanni D and Thomson BA (1996) Historical population movements in Europe influence genetic relationships in modern samples. Human Biology 68: 873–898.

Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97–159.

Wright S (1969) Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, vol. 2. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

Further Reading

Barbujani G and Sokal RR (1990) Zones of sharp genetic change in Europe are also linguistic boundaries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 87: 1816–1819.

Bertorelle G and Excoffier L (1998) Inferring admixture proportions from molecular data. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15: 1298–1311.

Garrigan D and Hammer MF (2006) Reconstructing human origins in the genomic era. Nature Reviews Genetics 7: 669–680.

Hudson RR, Slatkin M and Maddison WP (1992) Estimation of levels of gene flow from DNA sequence data. Genetics 132: 583–589.

Rousset F (2001) Inferences from spatial population genetics. In: Balding DJ, Bishop M and Cannings C (eds) Handbook of Statistical Genetics, pp. 239–269. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Seielstad MT, Minch E and Cavalli‐Sforza LL (1998) Genetic evidence for a higher female migration rate in humans. Nature Genetics 20: 278–280.

Slatkin M and Maddison WP (1990) Detecting isolation by distance using phylogenies of genes. Genetics 126: 249–260.

Tishkoff SA and Kidd KK (2004) Implications of biogeography of human populations for ‘race’ and medicine. Nature Genetics 36(suppl. 11): S21–S27.

Wakeley J (1999) Nonequilibrium migration in human history. Genetics 153: 1863–1871.

Wijsman EM and Cavalli‐Sforza LL (1984) Migration and genetic population structure with special reference to humans. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15: 279–301.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Barbujani, Guido(Apr 2008) Migration. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0005450.pub2]