Genetic Screening: Facilitating Informed Choices

Abstract

Informed decision‐making is fundamental to prenatal and genetic testing programmes.

Keywords: informed decision‐making; theory; decision aids; prenatal diagnosis; down syndrome

References

Baron J (1994) Thinking and Deciding, 2nd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Bekker HL (1999) Decision Making and Prenatal Testing. PhD Thesis, UK University of Leeds,

Bekker HL, Hewison J, Thornton JG (2003a) Understanding why decision aids work: linking process with outcome. Patient Education and Counseling (in press).

Bekker HL, Legare F, Stacey D and O'Connor AM (2003b) Is anxiety a suitable measure of decision aid effectiveness: a systematic review? Patient Education and Counseling (in press).

Bekker H, Thornton JG, Airey CM, et al. (1999) Informed Decision Making: An Annotated Bibliography and Systematic Review. NHS R&D Health Technology Assessment Programme 3. Southampton, UK: National Health Service

Chaiken S (1980) Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39: 752–766.

Charles C, Whelan T and Gafni A (1999) What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment? British Medical Journal 319: 780–782.

Drake E, Engler‐Todd L, O'Connor AM, Surh L and Hunter A (1999) A decision aid for women of advanced maternal age. Frontiers in Fetal Health 1: 11.

Frisch D and Clemen RT (1994) Beyond expected utility: rethinking behavioural decision research. Psychological Bulletin 116: 46–54.

Graham W, Smith P, Kamal A, et al. (2000) Randomised controlled trial comparing effectiveness of touch screen system with leaflet for providing women with information on prenatal tests. British Medical Journal 320: 155–160.

Hewison J, Cuckle H, Baillie C, et al. (2001) Use of videotapes for viewing at home to inform choice in Down syndrome screening: a randomised controlled trial. Prenatal Diagnosis 21: 146–149.

Holmes‐Rovner M, Krol J, Schmitt N, et al. (1996) Patient satisfaction with health care decisions: the satisfaction with decision scale. Medical Decision Making 16: 58–64.

Janis IL and Mann L (1977) Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice and Commitment. New York, NY: The Free Press.

Ley P and Llewellyn S (1995) Improving patients' understanding, recall, satisfaction and compliance. In: Broome A and Llewellyn S (eds.) Health Psychology: Processes and Applications, 2nd edn. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.

Marteau TM (1995) Towards informed decisions about prenatal testing: a review. Prenatal Diagnosis 15: 1215–1226.

Marteau TM, Dormandy E and Michie S (2001) A measure of informed choice. Health Expectations 4: 99–108.

Michie S, Smith D and Marteau TM (1999) Prenatal tests: how are women deciding? Prenatal Diagnosis 19: 743–748.

O'Connor AM (1995) Validation of a decision conflict scale. Medical Decision Making 15: 25–30.

O'Connor AM, Llewellyn‐Thomas HA and Drake ER (1995) An Annotated Bibliography of Research on Shared Decision Making. Report of the Health Information Research Unit. Ottawa, Canada: Health Information Research Unit.

Royal College of Physicians Working Party (1989) Prenatal Diagnosis and Genetic Screening. London, UK: Royal College of Physicians.

Thornton JG, Hewison J, Lilford RJ and Vail A (1995) A randomised trial of three methods of giving information about prenatal testing. British Medical Journal 311: 1127–1130.

Zey M (1992) Criticisms of rational choice models. In: Zey M (ed.) Decision Making: Alternatives to Rational Choice Models, chap. 1, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Further Reading

Beach LR and Lipshitz R (1993) Why classical decision theory is an inappropriate standard for evaluating and aiding most human decision making. In: Klein GA, Orasanu J, Calderwood R and Zsambok CE (eds.) Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods, chap. 2. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Eiser JR and Van der Pligt J (1988) Attitudes and Decisions. London, UK: Routledge.

Entwistle VA, Sheldon TA, Sowden AJ and Watt IS (1996) Supporting consumer involvement in decision making: what constitutes quality in consumer health information? International Journal for Quality in Health Care 8: 425–437.

Murray J, Cuckle H, Sehmi I, Wilson C and Ellis A (2001) Quality of written information used in Down syndrome screening. Prenatal Diagnosis 21: 138–142.

O'Connor AM, Rostom A, Fiset V, et al. (1999) Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: a systematic review. British Medical Journal 319: 731–734.

O'Connor A and Edwards A (2001) The role of decision aids in promoting evidence‐based patient choice. In: Edwards A and Elwyn G (eds.) Evidence‐based Patient Choice: Inevitable or Impossible?, chap. 14, pp. 118–143. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Pauker SP and Pauker SG (1987) The amniocentesis decision: ten years of decision analytic experience. Birth Defects 23: 151–169.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Bekker, Hilary L(Sep 2006) Genetic Screening: Facilitating Informed Choices. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0005591]