Gamete Donation and ‘Race’

Nicky Hudson, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK

Published online: June 2015

DOI: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0005596.pub2

Abstract

Examining processes of gamete donation offers an opportunity to expose ideas about ‘race’ and examine perceptions about the racial substance that is ‘passed on’ from donor to offspring. Racial categories are of interest in the context of gamete donation because established ideas about the transmission of racial markers between generations and within racialised communities infuse the way in which donation is organised in clinical settings. The use and maintenance of these categories in donation practice has wider political implications because it reinscribes and re‐legitimises problematic and contested categories. This short article begins with an overview of the conceptual challenges associated with categorisations of race, considers the subsequent complexities of differentiating gamete donors in racial terms and concludes with a discussion of the implications of these debates for clinical practice, kinship relations and beyond.

Key Concepts

  • Ideas about the existence of discrete racial groups have been largely resigned to the history of scientific racism and colonialism.
  • Despite their contested nature, racial categories endure as a powerful visible signifier for relatedness and belonging in biological terms as well as carrying ideas about cultural and social relatedness, which are highly pertinent in understanding kinship.
  • Gamete donation, a form of assisted reproduction, offers a useful lens through which to expose ideas about race and examine perceptions about the racial substance that is ‘passed on’ from donor to offspring.
  • The ways people think about and select donors based on their racial or ethnic identities are often flexible and contingent and can therefore be at odds with commonly understood or clinically defined racial categories.
  • Whilst it is unlikely that racial categorisation will be omitted from use in assisted reproduction practices, we should remain cautious about the value that is attributed to such characteristics, particularly in relation to the growing globalised market in fertility treatment.

Keywords: ethnicity; assisted conception; gamete donation; reproduction; matching

References

Aspinall PJ (2001) Operationalising the collection of ethnicity data in studies of the sociology of health and illness. Sociology of Health & Illness 23 (6): 829–86.

Bergmann S (2011) Reproductive agency and projects: Germans searching for egg donation in Spain and the Czech Republic. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 23: 600–608.

Birenbaum‐Carmelli D, Carmelli YS, Madjar Y and Weissenberg R (2002) Hegemony and homogeneity: donor choices of Israeli recipients of donor insemination. Journal of Material Culture 7: 73–95.

Bhopal R and Donaldson L (1998) White, European, Western, Caucasian, or what? Inappropriate labeling in research on race, ethnicity, and health. American Journal of Public Health 88 (9): 1303–1307.

Bradby H (2003) Describing ethnicity in health research. Ethnicity & Health 8 (1): 5–13.

Braun L, Fausto‐Sterling A, Fullwiley D, et al. (2007) Racial categories in medical practice: how useful are they? PLoS Medicine 4 (9): e271.

Carter R (2007) Genes, genomes and genealogies: the return of scientific racism? Ethnic and Racial Studies 30 (4): 546–556.

Caulfield T, Fullerton SM, Ali‐Khan SE, et al. (2009) Race and ancestry in biomedical research: exploring the challenges. Genome Medicine 1 (1): 8–8.8.

Culley L, Hudson N, Rapport R, et al. (2011) Crossing borders for fertility treatment: motivations, destinations and outcomes of UK fertility travellers. Human Reproduction 26 (9): 2373–2381.

Edwards J and Strathern M (2000) Including our own. In: Carsten J, (ed). Cultures of Relatedness. New Approaches to the Study of Kinship, pp. 146–167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Edwards J (2012) Introduction: the matter in kinship. In: Edwards J and Salazar C, (eds). European Kinship in the Age of Biotechnology, pp. 1–18. New York: Berghahn Books.

Fenton S (1999) Ethnicity: Racism, Class and Culture. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Fenton S (2003) Ethnicity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Fogg‐Davis H (2001) Navigating race in the market for human gametes. Hastings Center Report Sep/Oct 31 (5): 13–21.

Franklin S (1997) Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception. London: Routledge.

Heitman E and Schlachtenhaufen M (1996) The differential effects of race, ethnicity and socio‐economic situation on infertility treatment: ethical and policy issues for oocyte donation. In: Cohen CB, (ed). New Ways of Making Babies: The Case of Egg Donation, pp. 188–212. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Hudson N (2008) Infertility in British South Asian Communities: Negotiating the Community and the Clinic, Unpublished PhD thesis, Leicester: De Montfort University.

Hudson C and Culley L (2014) Infertility, gamete donation and relatedness in British South Asian Communities. In: Freeman T, Graham S, Ebtehaj F and Richards M, (eds). Relatedness in Assisted Reproduction: Families, Origins, Identities, pp. 232–250. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) (2014) Egg and sperm donation in the UK 2012–2013. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/Egg_and_sperm_donation_in_the_UK_2012‐2013.pdf (accessed 23/01/15).

Kahn SM (2000) Reproducing Jews. A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception in Israel. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Kroløkke CH (2014) West is best: affective assemblages and Spanish oocytes. European Journal of Women's Studies 21 (1): 57–71.

Long J and Kittles R (2009) Human genetic diversity and the nonexistence of biology races. Human Biology 81 (5–6): 777–798.

Miles R (1989) Racism. London: Routledge.

Miles R (1993) Racism After ‘Race Relations’. London: Routledge.

Nayak A (2006) After race: ethnography, race and post‐race theory. Ethnic and Racial Studies 29 (3): 411–430.

Nordqvist P (2012) ‘I don't want to stand out more than we already do’: Lesbian couples negotiating family connections in donor conception. Sexualities 15 (5–6): 644–661.

Price F (1997) Matchmaking in the clinic: gamete donation and the management of difference. In: Clarke A and Parsons E, (eds). Culture, Kinship and Genes. Towards Cross‐Cultural Genetics, pp. 218–230. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Quiroga S (2007) Blood is thicker than water: policing donor insemination and the reproduction of whiteness. Hypatia 22 (2): 143–161.

Ragoné H (2000) Of likeness and difference: how race is being transfigured by gestational surrogacy. In: Ragoné H and Twine FW, (eds). Ideologies and Technologies of Motherhood. Race, Class, Sexuality, Nationalism, pp. 56–75. London: Routledge.

Thompson C (2009) Skin tone and the persistence of biological race in egg donation for assisted conception. In: Glenn EN, (ed). Shades of Difference. Why Skin Colour Matters, pp. 131–147. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.

Thompson C (2005) Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Tutton R (2007) Opening the white box: exploring the study of whiteness in contemporary genetics research. Ethnic and Racial Studies 30 (4): 557–569.

Tyler K (2007) Race, genetics and inheritance. Reflections upon the birth of ‘Black’ twins to a ‘White’ IVF mother. In: Wade P, (ed). Race, Ethnicity and Nation. Perspectives from Kinship and Genetics, pp. 33–51. New York: Berghahn Books.

Tyler K (2005) The genealogical imagination: the inheritance of interracial identities. The Sociological Review 53 (3): 476–494.

Roberts D (1995) Race and the new reproduction. Hastings Law Journal 47: 935–950.

Roberts D (1997) Killing the Black Body. Race Reproduction and the Meaning of Liberty. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

Van Den Berghe PL (1995) Does race matter? Nations and Nationalism 1 (3): 357–368.

Vince G (2002) White IVF Couple Have Black Twins. http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2512 (accessed 22/01/15).

Further Reading

Culley L, Hudson N and Van Rooij F (eds) (2009) Marginalized Reproduction: Ethnicity, Infertility and New Reproductive Technologies. UK: Earthscan.

Rothman BK (2005) Weaving a Family: Untangling Race and Adoption. USA: Beacon Press Books.

Wade P (ed) (2007) Race, Ethnicity, and Nation: Perspectives from Kinship and Genetics. New York: Berghahn Books.

Related Sub-Topics:

Techniques and Tools in Clinical Genetics | Philosophy of the Life Sciences | Science and Society - General | Bioethics
Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

Article Title: Gamete Donation and ‘Race’
 
How to Cite close
Hudson, Nicky(Jun 2015) Gamete Donation and ‘Race’. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0005596.pub2]