Population Carrier Screening: Psychological Impact

Abstract

The psychological consequences of carrier screening for genetic conditions can include impacts on self‐efficacy, self‐concept, anxiety and understanding. Studies suggest that individuals’ willingness to undergo screening and their psychological responses to screening are variable, influenced by factors relating to programme design, presentation of information and the awareness and understanding of the condition/s for which screening is being offered. The integration of education and genetic counselling into screening programmes can facilitate informed decision‐making and positive adjustment to carrier status thus minimising the potential for negative psychosocial impacts. This will become increasingly important as advances in genetic testing technology broaden the scope of population‐based screening.

Key Concepts:

  • Limited public knowledge and awareness of genetic conditions poses challenges for individuals’ decision‐making regarding population‐based carrier screening.

  • The design of a screening programme can have an important influence on uptake of the genetic test.

  • Genetic counselling can play an integral role in facilitating informed decision‐making about screening and empowering individuals to adjust and adapt to a carrier result.

  • It is necessary to incorporate creative modes of educating individuals who are considering screening regarding the conditions for which testing is being offered.

Keywords: genetic carrier screening; cystic fibrosis; Tay–Sachs disease; sickle‐cell anaemia; fragile X syndrome; psychological psychosocial; test uptake; decision‐making; genetic counseling

Figure 1.

Potential psychological impacts of population genetic carrier screening.

close

References

Anido A, Carlson LM, Taft L and Sherman SL (2005) Women's attitudes toward testing for fragile X carrier status: a qualitative analysis. Journal of Genetic Counseling 14(4): 295–306.

Archibald AD, Jaques AM, Wake S et al. (2009) ‘It's something I need to consider’: decisions about carrier screening for fragile X syndrome in a population of non‐pregnant women. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 149A(12): 2731–2738.

Axworthy D, Brock DJ, Bobrow M and Marteau TM (1996) Psychological impact of population‐based carrier testing for cystic fibrosis: 3‐year follow‐up. UK cystic fibrosis follow‐up study group. Lancet 347(9013): 1443–1446.

Bekker H, Denniss G, Modell M, Bobrow M and Marteau T (1994) The impact of population based screening for carriers of cystic fibrosis. Journal of Medical Genetics 31(5): 364–368.

Bekker H, Modell M, Denniss G et al. (1993) Uptake of cystic fibrosis testing in primary care: supply push or demand pull? British Medical Journal 306(6892): 1584–1586.

Bell CJ, Dinwiddie DL, Miller NA et al. (2011) Carrier testing for severe childhood recessive diseases by next‐generation sequencing. Science Translational Medicine 3(65): 65ra4.

van den Berg M, Timmermans DR, Ten Kate LP, van Vugt JM and van der Wal G (2005) Are pregnant women making informed choices about prenatal screening? Genetics in Medicine 7(5): 332–338.

van den Berg M, Timmermans DR, Ten Kate LP, van Vugt JM and van der Wal G (2006) Informed decision making in the context of prenatal screening. Patient Education and Counseling 63(1–2): 110–117.

Childs B, Gordis L, Kaback MM and Kazazian HH Jr (1976) Tay–Sachs screening: social and psychological impact. American Journal of Human Genetics 28(6): 550–558.

Clayton EW, Hannig VL, Pfotenhauer JP et al. (1996) Lack of interest by nonpregnant couples in population‐based cystic fibrosis carrier screening. American Journal of Human Genetics 58(3): 617–627.

d'Agincourt‐Canning L (2005) The effect of experiential knowledge on construction of risk perception in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling 14(1): 55–69.

Etchegary H, Potter B, Howley H et al. (2008) The influence of experiential knowledge on prenatal screening and testing decisions. Genetic Testing 12(1): 115–124.

Fanos JH and Johnson JP (1995) Barriers to carrier testing for adult cystic fibrosis sibs: the importance of not knowing. American Journal of Medical Genetics 59(1): 85–91.

Fanos JH, Spangner KA and Musci TJ (2006) Attitudes toward prenatal screening and testing for fragile X. Genetics in Medicine 8(2): 129–133.

Gordon C, Walpole I, Zubrick SR and Bower C (2003) Population screening for cystic fibrosis: knowledge and emotional consequences 18 months later. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 120A(2): 199–208.

Grody WW, Dunkel‐Schetter C, Tatsugawa ZH et al. (1997) PCR‐based screening for cystic fibrosis carrier mutations in an ethnically diverse pregnant population. American Journal of Human Genetics 60(4): 935–947.

Henneman L, Bramsen I, van der Ploeg HM and Ten Kate LP (2002) Preconception cystic fibrosis carrier couple screening: impact, understanding, and satisfaction. Genetic Testing 6(3): 195–202.

Hill MK, Archibald AD, Cohen J and Metcalfe SA (2010) A systematic review of population screening for fragile X syndrome. Genetics in Medicine 12(7): 396–410.

Honnor M, Zubrick SR, Walpole I, Bower C and Goldblatt J (2000) Population screening for cystic fibrosis in Western Australia: community response. American Journal of Medical Genetics 93(3): 198–204.

James CA, Hadley DW, Holtzman NA and Winkelstein JA (2006) How does the mode of inheritance of a genetic condition influence families? a study of guilt, blame, stigma, and understanding of inheritance and reproductive risks in families with X‐linked and autosomal recessive diseases. Genetics in Medicine 8(4): 234–242.

Kleinveld JH, Ten Kate LP, van den Berg M, van Vugt JM and Timmermans DR (2009) Does informed decision making influence psychological outcomes after receiving a positive screening outcome? Prenatal Diagnosis 29(3): 271–273.

Leib JR, Gollust SE, Hull SC and Wilfond BS (2005) Carrier screening panels for ashkenazi jews: is more better? Genetics in Medicine 7(3): 185–190.

Levenkron JC, Loader S and Rowley PT (1997) Carrier screening for cystic fibrosis: test acceptance and one year follow‐up. American Journal of Medical Genetics 73(4): 378–386.

Marteau TM, van Duijn M and Ellis I (1992) Effects of genetic screening on perceptions of health: a pilot study. Journal of Medical Genetics 29(1): 24–26.

McClaren BJ, Delatycki MB, Collins V, Metcalfe SA and Aitken M (2008) ‘It is not in my world’: an exploration of attitudes and influences associated with cystic fibrosis carrier screening. European Journal of Human Genetics 16(4): 435–444.

McConkie‐Rosell A, Abrams L, Finucane B et al. (2007) Recommendations from multi‐disciplinary focus groups on cascade testing and genetic counseling for fragile X‐associated disorders. Journal of Genetic Counseling 16(5): 593–606.

McConkie‐Rosell A and DeVellis BM (2000) Threat to parental role: a possible mechanism of altered self‐concept related to carrier knowledge. Journal of Genetic Counseling 9(4): 285–302.

McConkie‐Rosell A, Spiridigliozzi GA, Sullivan JA, Dawson DV and Lachiewicz AM (2000) Carrier testing in fragile X syndrome: effect on self‐concept. American Journal of Medical Genetics 92(5): 336–342.

McConkie‐Rosell A, Spiridigliozzi GA, Sullivan JA, Dawson DV and Lachiewicz AM (2001) Longitudinal study of the carrier testing process for fragile X syndrome: perceptions and coping. American Journal of Medical Genetics 98(1): 37–45.

Metcalfe S, Jaques A, Archibald A et al. (2008) A model for offering carrier screening for fragile X syndrome to nonpregnant women: results from a pilot study. Genetics in Medicine 10(7): 525–535.

Mitchell JJ, Capua A, Clow C and Scriver CR (1996) Twenty‐year outcome analysis of genetic screening programs for Tay–Sachs and beta‐thalassemia disease carriers in high schools. American Journal of Human Genetics 59(4): 793–798.

Poppelaars FA, Henneman L, Ader HJ et al. (2004) Preconceptional cystic fibrosis carrier screening: attitudes and intentions of the target population. Genetic Testing 8(2): 80–89.

Prior TW, Snyder PJ, Rink BD et al. (2010) Newborn and carrier screening for spinal muscular atrophy. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 152A(7): 1608–1616.

Schwartz M, Brandt NJ and Skovby F (1993) Screening for carriers of cystic fibrosis among pregnant women: a pilot study. European Journal of Human Genetics 1(3): 239–244.

Tambor ES, Bernhardt BA, Chase GA et al. (1994) Offering cystic fibrosis carrier screening to an hmo population: factors associated with utilization. American Journal of Human Genetics 55(4): 626–637.

Watson E, Mayall E, Lamb J, Chapple J and Williamson R (1992) Psychological and social consequences of community carrier screening program for cystic fibrosis. The Lancet 340: 217–220.

Wilfond B and Ross LF (2009) From genetics to genomics: ethics, policy, and parental decision‐making. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 34(6): 639–647.

Williams JK and Schutte DL (1997) Benefits and burdens of genetic carrier identification. Western Journal of Nursing Research 19(1): 71–81.

Witt DR, Schaefer C, Hallam P et al. (1996) Cystic fibrosis heterozygote screening in 5161 pregnant women. American Journal of Human Genetics 58(4): 823–835.

Zeesman S, Clow CL, Cartier L and Scriver CR (1984) A private view of heterozygosity: eight‐year follow‐up study on carriers of the Tay–Sachs gene detected by high school screening in Montreal. American Journal of Medical Genetics 18(4): 769–778.

Further Reading

Godard B, Ten Kate L, Evers‐Kiebooms G and Ayme S (2003) Population genetic screening programs: principles, techniques, practices and policies. European Journal of Human Genetics 11(suppl. 2): S49–S87.

Lewis C, Skirton H and Jones R (2011) Can we make assumptions about the psychosocial impact of living as a carrier, based on studies assessing the effects of carrier testing? Journal of Genetic Counseling 20: 80–97.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Archibald, Alison D, and Wilfond, Benjamin S(Jul 2011) Population Carrier Screening: Psychological Impact. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0005641.pub2]