Prenatal Screening: Impact on Normal Pregnancies

Abstract

Focusing on the impact of prenatal screening on women's bodies, the paper sets the scene for an understanding of the social complexities of this type of screening. After looking briefly at the various types of procedures used during the prenatal period, I demonstrate how the mix of prenatal politics, reproductive genetics and gender creates threats to female embodiment. I contend that those of us working in the field need to construct new perceptions about how women's embodied experiences are shaped by these practices. As more prenatal technologies are being deployed, we need to expose the repressive dynamics at work.

Keywords: reproduction; genetics; prenatal; the body; screening

References

Advisory Committee on Genetic Testing (2000) Prenatal Genetic Testing. London: Department of Health.

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 77 (2007) Screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Obstetrics & Gynecology 109: 217–228.

Annandale E and Clark J (1996) What is gender? Feminist theory and the sociology of human reproduction. Sociology of Health and Illness 18(1): 17–44.

Badagliacco J and Ruiz C (2006) Impoverished Appalachia and Kentucky genomes: what is at stake? New Genetics and Society 25(2): 133–143. Special Issue on Feminism confronts the genome, Edited by E. Ettorre, B. K. Rothman and D. Steinberg.

Beekhuis JR (1993) Maternal Serum Screening for fetal Down's syndrome and Neural Tube Defects: A Prospective Study, Performed in the North of the Netherlands. National University: Groningen.

Bordo S (1993) Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture and the Body. Berkeley: The University of California Press.

Bunton R and Petersen A (2005) Genetics and governance: An Introduction. In: Bunton R and Petersen A (eds) Genetic Governance: Health, Risk and Ethics in a Biotech Era, pp. 1–27. London: Routledge.

Buskens E, Grobbee DE, Hess J and Wladimiroff JW (1995) Prenatal diagnosis of cogenital heart disease; prospects and problems. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 60: 5–11.

Chard T (1996) Screening for Down's syndrome. Clinical Endocrinology 44: 15.

Committee on Obstetric Practice (1994) American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee opinion ‘Down syndrome screening’. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 47: 186–190.

Concise Oxford Dictionary (1995) 9th edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Doyal L (1995) What Makes Women Sick: Gender and the Political Economy of Health. Houndsmill: Macmillan.

Ettorre E (2002) Reproductive Genetics, Gender and the Body. London: Routledge.

Farrant W (1985) Who's for amniocenteisis? In: Homans H (ed.) The Sexual Politics of Reproduction. Aldershot: Gower Publishing Company Limited.

Gimenez M (1991) The mode of reproduction in transition: a Marxist‐feminist analysis of the effects of reproductive technologies. Gender and Society 5(3): 334–350.

Heckerling PS, Verp MS and Hadro TA (1994) Preferences of pregnant women for amniocentesis or chronic villus sampling for prenatal testing: comparison of patients choices and those of a decision‐analytic model. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 47: 1215–1228.

Hindmarsh R (2005) Genetics engineering regulation in Australia: an ‘archeaology’ of expertise and power. Science as Culture 14(4): 373–392.

Hubbard R (1986) Eugenics and prenatal testing. International Journal of Health Services 16(2): 227–242.

Kuller JA and Laifer SA (1995) Contemporary approaches to prenatal diagnosis. American Family Physician 52(8): 2277–2283.

Le Breton D (2004) Genetic fundamentalism or the cult of the gene. Body and Society 10(4): 1–20.

Lee R and Morgan D (1989) A lesser sacrifice? sterilization and mentally handicapped women. In: Lee R and Morgan D (eds) Birthrights, Law and Ethics at the beginnings of Life, pp. 132–154. New York and London: Routledge.

Malone PSJ (1996) Antenatal diagnosis of renal tract anomalies: has it increased the sum of human happiness? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 89(3): 155–158.

Marteau T, Shaw R and Slack J (1994) Routine Prenatal Testing for Fetal Abnormalities. London: Medical Research Council.

Nicholas B (2001) Exploring a moral landscape: genetic science and ethics. Hypatia 16(1): 45–63.

Overall C (1987) Ethics and Human Reproduction. Boston: Allen and Unwin.

Reid M (1991) The Diffusion of Four Prenatal Screening Tests Across Europe. London: King's Fund Centre for Health Services Development.

Rothenberg K and Thomson EJ (1994) Women and prenatal testing. In: Rothenberg K and Thomson EJ (eds) Women and Prenatal Testing Facing the Challenges of Genetic Testing. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Press.

Wald NJ, Densem JW, George L, Muttukrishna S and Knight PG (1996) Prenatal screening for Downs's syndrome using Inhibin‐A as a serum marker. Prenatal Diagnosis 16: 143–153.

Wetherall DJ (1991) The New Genetics and Clinical Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Further Reading

Ettorre E (2002) Reproductive Genetics, Gender and the Body. London: Routledge.

Ettorre E, Rothman BK and Steinberg D (eds) (2006) Feminism confronts the genome. New Genetics and Society 25(2), Special issue.

Green JM (1990a) Prenatal screening and diagnosis: some psychological and social issues. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 97: 1074–1076.

Green JM (1990b) Calming or Harming?: A Review of Psychological Effects of Fetal Diagnosis on Pregnant Women. London: The Galton Institute.

Rothman BK (1994) The Tentative Pregnancy: Amniocentesis and the Sexual Politics of Motherhood. London: Pandora.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Ettorre, Elizabeth(Sep 2007) Prenatal Screening: Impact on Normal Pregnancies. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0005645]