| References |
|
|
ePath
Alder Hey Report
(2001) The Royal Liverpool Children's Inquiry Report, 30 January, 2001. http://www.rlcinquiry.org.uk/
|
|
|
ePath
Bristol Report
(2000) The Inquiry into the Management of Care of Chil dren Receiving Complex Heart Surgery at The Bristol Royal Infirmary, Chair, Professor Ian Kennedy, Interim Report, May 2000; Final Report, July 2001. http://www.bristol-inquiry.org.uk/index.htm
|
|
|
other
Doodeward versus Spence
(1908) 6 Commonwealth Law Reports 406, High Court of Australia.
|
|
|
book
Harris JW
(1996)
Property and Justice,
pp.
351–359.
Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
|
|
|
ePath
Human Tissue Authority, Code of Practice – Consent
(Code 1, 2006) at http://www.hta.gov.uk/_db/_documents/2006-07-04_Approved_by_Parliament_-_Code_of_Practice_1_-_Consent.pdf
|
|
|
Mason JK and
Laurie GT
(2001)
Consent or property? Dealing with the body and its parts in the shadow of Bristol and Alder Hey.
Medical Law Review
64(5):
710–729.
|
|
|
other
Moore versus Regents of the University of California
(1990) 793 P 2d 479 California Supreme Court.
|
|
|
book
MRC
(2001)
Human Tissue and Biological Samples for use in Research (including Operational and Ethical Guidelines, 2004).
London, UK: Medical Research Council.
|
|
|
Skene L
(2002a)
Proprietary rights in human bodies, body parts and tissue: regulatory contexts and proposals for new laws.
Legal Studies
22(1):
102–127.
|
|
|
Skene L
(2002b)
Arguments against people ‘owning’ their own bodies, body parts and tissue.
Macquarie Law Journal
2:
165–176.
|
|
|
Skene L
(2007)
Legal rights in human bodies, body parts and tissue.
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
4(2):
129–133.
|
|
|
other
The Human Tissue Act
(2004) An assessment of the Act and its implications for the specialties of clinical and laboratory genetics. Alison Hall, Anneke Lucassen, Gail Norbury, Heather Skirton, Alastair Kent, John Crolla (A working party of the Joint Committee on Medical Genetics of The Royal College of Physicians The British Society for Human Genetics The Royal College of Pathologist) JCMG Guidance on the Human Tissue Act 03.10.06.
|
|
|
other
Washington University versus William J Catalona et al.
(2006) 437 Federal Supplement 2nd Series 985.
|
| Further Reading |
|
|
ePath
Australian Law Reform Commission Report No 96
(2003) Essentially Yours: The Protection of Human Genetic Information in Australia. http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/alrc/publications/reports/96/
|
|
|
other
Chief Medical Officer, UK
(2001) Organ Retention: Interim Guidance on Post-Mortem Examination. London, UK.
|
|
|
other
Council of Europe
(1997) Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine.
|
|
|
Grubb A
(1998)
I, me, mine: bodies parts and property.
Medical Law International
3:
299.
|
|
|
book
Hardcastle RJ
(2006)
"The development of clear legal principles is necessary to enable individuals to have effective control over separated human tissue and to enable the efficient use of such materials in medical research".
In: Law and the Human Body: Property Rights, Ownership and Control.
Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing.
|
|
|
other
Human Genetics Commission, UK
(October–December 2000) Public Attitudes to Human Genetic Information.
|
|
|
other
Human Genome Organisation Ethics Committee
(1998) Statement on DNA Sampling: Control and Access. London, UK.
|
|
|
book
Kennedy I and
Grubb A
(2000)
Medical Law,
3rd edn.
London, UK: Butterworths.
|
|
|
book
Laurie G
(2002)
Genetic Privacy. A Challenge to Medico-legal Norms.
Cambridge University Press,
http://www.cambridge.org/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=0521660270
|
|
|
book
Magnusson RS
(1998)
"Proprietary rights in human tissue".
In: Palmer N and
McKendrick E (eds)
Interests in Goods,
2nd edn.
London, UK: Lloyds of London Press.
|
|
|
book
Morgan D
(2001)
Issues in Medical Law and Ethics,
pp.
83–104.
London, UK: Cavendish.
|
|
|
book
MRC
(2000)
Public Perceptions of the Collection of Human Biological Samples.
London, UK: Medical Research Council.
|
|
|
book
National Health and Medical Research Council
(1998)
National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Research involving Humans.
Australia: Canberra.
|
|
|
other
Nuffield Council on Bioethics, UK
(1995) Human Tissue, Ethical and Legal Issues. London, UK.
|
|
|
Skene L
(1998)
Patients’ rights or family responsibilities? Two approaches to genetic testing.
Medical Law Review
6:
1–41.
|
