Mitosis: Chromosome Segregation and Stability

Mammalian cells are charged with the task of evenly distributing 46 chromosomes to each of two daughter cells during every mitotic cell cycle. Abnormal function of any one of the numerous genes involved in this process can result in the aberrant transmission of chromosomes from the parental cell to its progeny.

Keywords: aneuploidy; centrosome; checkpoint; chromosome; mitosis

Figure 1. Centriole replication. Centrosome duplication begins in G1 during which the centrioles (cylinders) separate and begin to replicate. This process is finished by late G2. At this phase of the cell cycle, the two centrioles are part of a single centrosomal complex which splits into two at the beginning of the M phase. Microtubules are nucleated from the centrosome matrix (circles).
Figure 2. Mitosis from prometaphase through anaphase. At prometaphase, chromosomes are not yet aligned at the metaphase plate, and monooriented chromosomes lacking a bipolar spindle attachment will activate the mitotic checkpoint. Once all of the chromosomes are fully aligned at the metaphase plate in a bipolar orientation, the checkpoint is inactivated and Mad2l1 repression of APC activity is relieved. Securin is then ubiquitinated (Ub) by the APC, resulting in its release of separin, proteolytic destruction of the cohesins and anaphase onset (CENPE: human centromeric protein E).
Figure 3. Examples of mitotic errors and a list of the gene products associated with their abnormalities. See text for additional details.
close
 References
    Artandi SE, et al. (2000) Telomere dysfunction promotes non-reciprocal translocations and epithelial cancers in mice. Nature 406: 641–645.
    Cahill DP, et al. (1998) Mutations of mitotic checkpoint genes in human cancers. Nature 392: 300–303.
    Dobles M, Liberal V, Scott ML, Benezra R and Sorger PK (2000) Chromosome missegregation and apoptosis in mice lacking the mitotic checkpoint protein Mad2. Cell 101: 635–645.
    Fodde R, et al. (2001) Mutations in the APC tumour suppressor gene cause chromosomal instability. Nature Cell Biology 3: 433–438.
    Fukasawa K, Choi T, Kuriyama R, Rulong S and Van de Woude GF (1996) Abnormal centrosome amplification in the absence of p53. Science 271: 1744–1747.
    Hollander MC, et al. (1999) Genomic instability in Gadd45a-deficient mice. Nature Genetics 23: 176–184.
    Jallepalli PV, et al. (2001) Securin is required for chromosomal stability in human cells. Cell 105: 445–457.
    Jin DY, Spencer F and Jeang KT (1998) Human T cell leukemia virus type 1 oncoprotein Tax targets the human mitotic checkpoint protein MAD1. Cell 93: 81–91.
    Kalitsis P, Earle E, Fowler KJ and Choo KH (2000) Bub3 gene disruption in mice reveals essential mitotic spindle checkpoint function during early embryogenesis. Genes and Development 14: 2277–2282.
    Kaplan KB, et al. (2001) A role for the adenomatous polyposis coli protein in chromosome segregation. Nature Cell Biology 3: 429–432.
    Li Y and Benezra R (1996) Identification of a human mitotic checkpoint gene: hsMAD2. Science 274: 246–248.
    Michel LS, et al. (2001) MAD2 haplo-insufficiency causes premature anaphase and chromosome instability in mammalian cells. Nature 409: 355–359.
    Romanov SR, et al. (2001) Normal human mammary epithelial cells spontaneously escape senescence and acquire genomic changes. Nature 409: 633–637.
    Saavedra HI, Fukasawa K, Conn CW and Stambrook PJ (1999) MAPK mediates RAS-induced chromosome instability. Journal of Biological Chemistry 274: 38083–38090.
    Spruck CH, Won KA and Reed SI (1999) Deregulated cyclin E induces chromosome instability. Nature 401: 297–300.
    Stearns T (2001) Centrosome duplication a centriolar pas de deux. Cell 105: 417–420.
    Tutt A, et al. (1999) Absence of Brca2 causes genome instability by chromosome breakage and loss associated with centrosome amplification. Current Biology 9: 1107–1110.
    Xu X, et al. (1999) Centrosome amplification and a defective G2-M cell cycle checkpoint induce genetic instability in BRCA1 exon 11 isoform-deficient cells. Molecular Cell 3: 389–395.
    Zhou H, et al. (1998) Tumour amplified kinase STK15/BTAK induces centrosome amplification, aneuploidy and transformation. Nature Genetics 20: 189–193.
    Zou H, McGarry TJ, Bernal T and Kirschner MW (1999) Identification of a vertebrate sister-chromatid separation inhibitor involved in transformation and tumorigenesis. Science 285: 418–422.
 Further Reading
    Cross SM, et al. (1995) A p53-dependent mouse spindle checkpoint. Science 267: 1353–1356.
    De Pinho RA (2000) The age of cancer. Nature 408: 248–254.
    Funabiki H and Murray AW (2000) The Xenopus chromokinesin Xkid is essential for metaphase chromosome alignment and must be degraded to allow anaphase chromosome movement. Cell 102: 411–424.
    Griffin CS, Simpson PJ, Wilson CR and Thacker J (2000) Mammalian recombination-repair genes XRCC2 and XRCC3 promote correct chromosome segregation. Nature Cell Biology 2: 757–761.
    Hoyt MA (2000) Exit from mitosis: spindle pole power. Cell 102: 267–270.
    Lengauer C, Kinzler KW and Vogelstein B (1997) Genetic instability in colorectal cancers. Nature 386: 623–627.
    Lengauer C, Kinzler KW and Vogelstein B (1998) Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature 396: 643–649.
    Scully R and Livingston DM (2000) In search of the tumour-suppressor functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Nature 408: 429–432.
    Waizenegger IC, Hauf S, Meinke A and Peters JM (2000) Two distinct pathways remove mammalian cohesin from chromosome arms in prophase and from centromeres in anaphase. Cell 103: 399–410.
    Wassmann K and Benezra R (2001) Mitotic checkpoints: from yeast to cancer. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development 11: 83–90.
 Web Links
    ePath Adenomatosis polyposis coli (APC); Locus ID: 324. LocusLink: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/LocusLink/LocRpt.cgi?l=324
    ePath BUB1 budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 homolog (yeast) (BUB1); Locus ID: 699. LocusLink: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/LocusLink/LocRpt.cgi?l=699
    ePath BUB1 budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 homolog beta (yeast) (BUB1B); Locus ID: 701. LocusLink: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/LocusLink/LocRpt.cgi?l=701
    ePath BUB3 budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 3 homolog (yeast) (BUB3); Locus ID: 9184. LocusLink: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/LocusLink/LocRpt.cgi?l=9184
    ePath MAD1 mitotic arrest deficient-like 1 (yeast) (MAD1L1); Locus ID: 8379. LocusLink: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/LocusLink/LocRpt.cgi?l=8379
    ePath MAD2 mitotic arrest deficient-like 1 (yeast) (MAD2L1); Locus ID: 4085. LocusLink: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/LocusLink/LocRpt.cgi?l=4085
    ePath Adenomatosis polyposis coli (APC); MIM number: 175100. OMIM: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Omim/dispmim?175100
    ePath BUB1 budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 homolog (yeast) (BUB1); MIM number: 602452. OMIM: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Omim/dispmim?602452
    ePath BUB1 budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 homolog beta (yeast) (BUB1B); MIM number: 602860. OMIM: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Omim/dispmim?602860
    ePath BUB3 budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 3 homolog (yeast) (BUB3); MIM number: 603719. OMIM: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Omim/dispmim?603719
    ePath MAD1 mitotic arrest deficient-like 1 (yeast) (MAD1L1); MIM number: 602686. OMIM: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Omim/dispmim?602686
    ePath MAD2 mitotic arrest deficient-like 1 (yeast) (MAD2L1); MIM number: 601467. OMIM: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Omim/dispmim?601467
Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Michel, Loren, and Benezra, Robert(Jan 2006) Mitosis: Chromosome Segregation and Stability. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1038/npg.els.0005774]