DNA Databanks and Genomics Research: Forensic and Military (Ab)Uses

Abstract

Efforts to identify criminal suspects, victims of crime, those killed in military conflicts and mass fatality casualties are increasingly supported by the availability of databanks holding deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) profiles obtained from known subjects. The development of these databanks has been made possible by advances in forensic genetic technologies, legislative changes and substantial (usually state) investment. Although there is widespread public support for the criminal justice uses of these innovations in genetic and information technologies, some critics argue that the growth of forensic DNA databanks and their expanding use by police and judicial authorities can also threaten individual and collective human rights. Relevant questions are: what should be the criteria for the inclusion and retention of profiles in forensic DNA databanks; what are the legitimate uses of samples and profiles; and what governance arrangements are appropriate to secure public trust in forensic DNA databank establishment and growth?

Key Concepts

  • Several substantial research studies have shown that forensic DNA profiling and databanking can play a significant and cost‐effective role in criminal justice outcomes for a wide variety of crime types.

  • There is a global trend for criminal jurisdictions to adopt forensic DNA profiling and databanking in support of criminal investigations and prosecutions.

  • DNA profiling and matching is an important resource for the identification of civilian and military casualties in conflict and natural disaster situations.

  • Public trust in the police and judicial forensic DNA databanks depends on the inclusiveness, transparency and accountability of databank governance arrangements.

  • Legislation governing criminal and military DNA databanks normally specifies that information cannot be shared between these and medical databanks.

  • There is increasing interest in the investigative usefulness of automated exchange of forensic DNA profiles between national jurisdictions; new transnational arrangements are emerging – at least within the European Union – to reflect this interest.

Keywords: DNA databank; short tandem repeats; forensics; DNA profiling; forensic genetics

References

Baskin D and Sommers I (2010) The influence of forensic evidence on the case outcome of homicide incidents. Journal of Criminal Justice 38: 1141–1149.

Bhati A and Roman CG (2014) Evaluating and quantifying the specific deterrent effects of DNA databases. Evaluation Review 38: 1–26.

Briody M (2006) The effects of DNA evidence on property offences in court. Current Issues in Criminal Justice 17(3): 380–396.

Butler JM (2005) Forensic DNA Typing, 2nd edn. London: Academic Press.

Butler JM (2011) Advanced Topics in Forensic DNA Typing: Methodology. London: Academic Press.

Cabezudo B and Maria J (eds) (2013) Police DNA Databases. Madrid: Dykinson.

Chalmers D (ed.) (2005) Genetic Testing and the Criminal Law. London: UCL Press.

Eisenberg A, Shade LL and Trunbough SM (2011) Ushering in a new generation of DNA analysts. Forensic Magazine http://www.forensicmag.com/articles/2011/10/ushering-new-generation-dna-analysts

Gill P, Fereday L, Morling N and Schneider PM (2006) The evolution of DNA databases – recommendations for new European STR loci. Forensic Science International 156(2–3): 242–244.

Ham PA (2003) An army of suspects: the history and constitutionality of the U.S. Military's DNA repository and its access for law enforcement purposes. The Army Lawyer 27‐50‐363. http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/07-08-2003.pdf

Hares DR (2012) Addendum to expanding the CODIS core loci in the United States. Forensic Science International: Genetics 6: e135.

Hepple B (2009) Forensic databases: implications of the cases of S and Marper. Medicine, Science & The Law 49: 77–87.

Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary (2000) Under the Microscope: Thematic Inspection Report on Scientific and Technical Support. London: Home Office.

Hindmarsh R and Prainsack B (eds) (2010) Genetic Suspects: Global Governance of Forensic DNA Profiling and Databasing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Home Office (2006) DNA Expansion Programme 2000–2005: Reporting Achievement. London: Home Office.

INTERPOL (2012) Global DNA Survey. Lyon: INTERPOL.

Irwin JA, Parson W, Coble MD and Just RS (2011) mtGenome reference population databases and the future of forensic mtDNA analysis. Forensic Science International: Genetics 5(3): 222–225.

Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V and Thein SL (1985a) Hypervariable “minisatellite” regions in human DNA. Nature 314: 67–73.

Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V and Thein SL (1985b) Individual‐specific “fingerprints” of human DNA. Nature 316: 76–79.

Kierkegaard S and Saxby S (2008) Security and DNA data transfer within the EU: The Prum decision – an uncontrolled fishing expedition in ‘BIg Brother’ Europe. Computer Law and Security Report.

Lazer D (ed.) (2004) DNA and the Criminal Justice System: The Technology of Justice. Harvard: MIT Press.

Lee H and Tirnady F (2004) Blood Evidence: How DNA is Revolutionizing the Way We Solve Crimes. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Nelkin D and Andrews L (1999) DNA identification and surveillance creep. Sociology of Health and Illness 21: 689–706.

Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2007) The Forensic Uses of Bioinformation: Ethical Issues. London: The Nuffield Council.

Noble A and Moulton BW (eds) (2006) DNA Fingerprinting and Civil Liberties. (Special Issue of the Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 34: 2).

Palmer LJJ (2004) Encyclopaedia of DNA and the United States Criminal Justice System. Jefferson, NC: MCFarland and Company Inc.

Peterson J, Sommers I, Deborah B and Donald J (2010) The Role and Impact of Forensic Evidence in the Criminal Justice Process. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

Peterson J, Crim D, Hickamn MJ, Strom K and Johnson DJ (2013) Effect of Forensic Evidence on Criminal Justice Case Processing. Journal of Forensic Sciences 51: 590.

Prainsack B and Toom V (2010) The Prüm regime: Situated dis/empowerment in transnational DNA profile exchange. British Journal of Criminology 50(6): 1117–1135.

Roman JK, Reid S, Reid J et al. (2008) The DNA Field Experiment: Cost‐Effectiveness Analysis of the Use of DNA in the Investigation of High‐Volume Crimes. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

Schneider PM (2009) Expansion of the European Standard Set of DNA Databse Loci: The current situation. Profiles in DNA 6–7.

Wallace H, Jackson AR, Gruber J and Thibedeau AD (2014) Forensic DNA databases- ethical and legal standards: A global review. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences 4: 57–63.

Weedn VW (1998) Stored biologic specimens for military identification: the Department of Defense DNA Registry. In: Robert F (ed.) Stored Tissue Samples: Ethical, Legal and Public Policy Implications, pp. 345–357. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press.

Williams R and Johnson P (2008) Genetic Policing: The Uses of DNA in Police Investigations. Cullompton: Willan.

Further Reading

Duster T (2003) Backdoor to Eugenics, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Routledge.

Fraser J and Williams R (2009) Handbook of Forensic Science. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

Human Genetics Commission (2009) Nothing to Hide, Nothing to Fear? Balancing Individual Rights and the Public Interest in the Governance and Use of the National DNA Database. London: HGC.

Kaye DH (2010) The Double Helix and The Law of Evidence. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.

Lynch M, Cole S, McNally R and Jordan K (2008) Truth Machine: The Contentious History of DNA Fingerprinting. Chicago, IL: Chicago Univeristy Press.

Lynch MD and Jasanoff S (eds) (1998) Contested Identities: Science, Law and Forensic Practice (Special Issue of Social Studies of Science 28: 5–6).

McCartney C (2006a) Forensic Identification and Criminal Justice. Cullompton: Willan.

McCartney C (2006b) The DNA expansion programme and criminal investigation. British Journal of Criminology 46: 175–192.

Newburn T, Williamson T and Wright A (eds) (2007) Handbook of Criminal Investigation. Cullompton: Willan.

Williams R and Johnson P (2004) ‘Wonderment and Dread’: representations of DNA in ethical disputes about Forensic DNA Databases. New Genetics & Society 23: 205–222.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Williams, Robin(Nov 2014) DNA Databanks and Genomics Research: Forensic and Military (Ab)Uses. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0005859.pub2]