Aitken M, Cunningham‐Burley S and Pagliari C (2016) Moving from trust to trustworthiness: experiences of public engagement in the Scottish Health Informatics Programme. Science and Public Policy. Advance Access published May 11, 2016.
Allum N, Sturgis P, Tabourazi D and Brunton‐Smith I (2008) Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta‐analysis. Public Understanding of Science 17: 35–54.
Allum N, Sibley E, Sturgis P and Stoneman P (2014) Religious beliefs, knowledge about science and attitudes towards medical genetics. Public Understanding of Science 23: 833–849.
ASCB (2009) ASCB Statement in Support of Research on Genetically Modified Organisms. http://www.ascb.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=315&Itemid=31. Accessed on 15 July 2009.
ASCB (2016) Science Public Outreach–Supporting Those Who Do. http://www.ascb.org/can‐the‐science‐paradox‐be‐resolved/. Accessed on 10 July 2016.
Balmer C, Griffiths F and Dunn J (2014) A qualitative systematic review exploring lay understanding of cancer by adults without a cancer diagnosis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 70: 1688–1701.
Bauer MW, Allum N and Miller S (2007) What Can We learn from 25 years of PUS Survey Research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Understanding of Science 16: 79–95.
Bauer MW (2016) Results of the essay competition on the ‘deficit concept’. Public Understanding of Science 25: 398–399.
Bhatta A and Misra KD (2016) Biotechnology communication needs a rethink. Current Science 110: 573–578.
Collins HM and Evans R (2002) The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science 32: 235–296.
Condit C (1999a) How the public understands genetics: non‐deterministic and non‐discriminatory interpretations of the ‘blueprint’ metaphor. Public Understanding of Science 8: 169–180.
Condit C (1999b) The Meanings of the Gene: Public Debates about Human Heredity. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Condit C (2001) What is ‘public opinion about genetics’? Nature Reviews Genetics 2: 811–815.
Condit CM (2010) Public attitudes and beliefs about genetics. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 11: 339–359.
Cortassa C (2016) In science communication, Why does the idea of a public deficit always return? The eternal recurrence of the public deficit. Public Understanding of Science 25: 447–459.
Cunningham‐Burley S (2006) Public knowledge and public trust. Community Genetics 9: 204–210.
Deutsche Welle (2008) Public Needs Better Understanding of Genetics, Expert Says. http://www.dw.com/en/public‐needs‐better‐understanding‐of‐genetics‐expert‐says/a‐3524469. Accessed on 11 October 2016.
Engdahl Emma and Rolf Lidskog (2014) Risk, Communication and Trust: Towards an Emotional Understanding of Trust. Public Understanding of Science 23 (6): 703–717. DOI: 10.1177/0963662512460953.
Etchegary H (2014) Public attitudes toward genetic risk testing and its role in healthcare. Personalized Medicine 11: 509–522.
Evans G and Durant J (1995) The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science 4: 57–74.
Fan M‐F (2015) Evaluating the 2008 consensus conference on genetically modified foods in Taiwan. Public Understanding of Science 24: 533–546.
Henneman L, Timmermans DRM and Van der Wal G (2004) Public experiences, knowledge and expectations about medical genetics and the use of genetic information. Community Genetics 7: 33–43.
Henneman L, Vermeulen E, Van El CG, et al. (2013) Public attitudes towards genetic testing revisited: comparing opinions between 2002 and 2010. European Journal of Human Genetics 21: 793–799.
HGC (2001) Public Attitudes to Human Genetic Information, People's Panel Quantitative Study Conducted for the Human Genetics Commission. https://www.ipsos‐mori.com/assets/docs/archive/polls/hgcrep.pdf. Accessed on 11 October 2016.
HGC (2002) The Supply of Genetic Tests Direct to the Public: A Consultation Document. London, UK: HGC.
HGC (2006) Making Babies: Reproductive Decisions and Genetic Technologies. London, UK: HGC.
HGC (2011) Human Genetics Commission Home Page. http://wayback.archive.org/web/20111017054912/http://www.hgc.gov.uk/Client/index.asp?ContentId=1. Accessed on 14 July 2016.
Hickman F, Kennedy M and McInerny J (1978) Human genetics education: result of BSCS needs assessment surveys. American Biology Teacher 38: 285–308.
Irwin A (1995) Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. London, UK: Routledge.
Irwin A and Wynne B (eds) (1996) Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Irwin A (2001) Constructing the scientific citizen: science and democracy in the biosciences. Public Understanding of Science 10: 1–18.
Irwin A (2006) The politics of talk: coming to terms with the ‘new’ scientific governance. Social Studies of Science 36: 299–320.
Irwin A (2014) Risk, science and public communication: third‐order thinking about scientific culture. In: Bucchi M and Trench B (eds) Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, 2nd edn, pp. 160–172. London and New York: Routledge.
Ishiyama I, Tanzawa T, Watanabe M, et al. (2012) Public attitudes to the promotion of genomic crop studies in Japan: correlations between genomic literacy, trust, and favourable attitude. Public Understanding of Science 21: 495–512.
Kerr A and Cunningham‐Burley S (1998) The new genetics and health: mobilizing lay expertise. Public Understanding of Science 7: 41–60.
Kurath M (2016) The culture of science: how the public relates to science across the globe. New Genetics and Society 35: 90–92.
Lambert H and Rose H (1996) Disembodied knowledge? Making sense of medical science. In: Irwin A and Wynne B (eds) Misunderstanding Science: The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology, pp. 65–83. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lanie AD, Jayaratne TE, Sheldon JP, et al. (2004) Exploring the public understanding of basic genetic concepts. Journal of Genetic Counseling 13: 305–320.
Layton D, Jenkins E, MacGill S and Davey A (1992) Inarticulate Science? Perspectives on the Public Understanding of Science and Some Implications for Science Education. Driffield, UK: Studies in Education Limited.
Marks NJ and Russell AW (2015) Public engagement in biosciences and biotechnologies: reflections on the role of sociology and STS. Journal of Sociology 51: 97–115.
Martin S and Tait J (1993) Release of Genetically Modified Organisms: Public Attitudes and Understanding. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University, Centre for Technology Strategy.
Martin PM (1998) Lay understanding of Mendelian genetics. Endeavour 22: 92–93.
Meyer G (2016) In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return? Public Understanding of Science 25: 433–446.
Moore A (2010) Public bioethics and public engagement: the politics of “proper talk”. Public Understanding of Science 19: 197–211.
Myers M, Bernhardt B, Tambor E and Holtzman N (1994) Involving consumers in the development of an educational program for cystic fibrosis carrier screening. American Journal of Human Genetics 54: 719–726.
Nelkin D and Lindee S (1995) The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon. New York: WH Freeman.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics (1993) Genetic Screening – Ethical Issues. London, UK: Nuffield Foundation.
Rapp R (1988) Chromosomes and communication: the discourse of genetic counseling. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 2: 143–157.
Richards M (1996) Lay and professional knowledge of genetics and inheritance. Public Understanding of Science 5: 217–230.
Sanders T, Campbell R, Donovan J and Sharp D (2007) Narrative accounts of hereditary risk: knowledge about family history, lay theories of disease and ‘internal’ and ‘external’ causation. Qualitative Health Research 17: 510–520.
Simis MJ, Madden H, Cacciatore MA and Yeo SK (2016) The lure of rationality: why does the deficit model persist in science communication? Public Understanding of Science 25: 400–414.
Sharon T (2015) Healthy citizenship beyond autonomy and discipline: tactical engagements with genetic testing. BioSocieties 10: 295–316.
Soulier A, Leonar S and Cambon‐Thomsen A (2016) From the arcane to the mundane: engaging French publics in discussing clinical applications of genomic technology. New Genetics and Society 35: 1–28.
Steinbach RJ, Allyse M, Michie M, Liu EY and Cho MK (2016) “This lifetime commitment”: public conceptions of disability and noninvasive prenatal genetic screening. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 170: 363–374.
Suldovsky B (2016) In science communication, Why does the idea of the public deficit always return? Exploring key influences. Public Understanding of Science 25: 415–426.
Sturgis P and Allum N (2004) Science in society: re‐evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science 13: 55–74.
Vermeulen E, Henneman L, Van El CG and Cornel MC (2014) Public attitudes towards preventive genomics and personal interest in genetic testing to prevent disease: a survey study. European Journal of Public Health 24: 768–775.
West KM, Hopkins SE, Hopper KJ, Mohatt GV and Boyer BB (2013) Found in translation: decoding local understandings of genetics and heredity in a Yup'ik Eskimo community. Public Understanding of Science 22: 80–90.
WHO (2016) Genes and Human Disease. http://www.who.int/genomics/public/geneticdiseases/en/index3.html. Accessed on 6 July 2016.
Wynne B (1991) Knowledges in context. Science, Technology & Human Values 16: 111–121.
Wynne B (2006) Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science – hitting the notes, but missing the music? Community Genetics 9: 211–220.
Atkinson P, Glasner P and Lock M (eds) (2009) Handbook of Genetics and Society: Mapping the New Genomic Era. London and New‐York: Routledge.
Bucchi M and Trench B (2014) Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. London and New York: Routledge.
Conrad P and Gabe J (eds) (1999) Sociological Perspectives on the New Genetics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
Goven J (2006) Processes of inclusion, cultures of calculation, structures of power; scientific citizenship and the royal commission on genetic modification. Science, Technology & Human Values 31: 565–598.
Irwin A and Michael M (2003) Science, Social Theory and Public Knowledge. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.