Augoustinos M, Crabb S and Shepherd R (2010) Genetically modified food in the news: media representations of the GM debate in the UK. Public Understanding of Science 19: 98–114.
Bartlett C, Sterne J and Egger M (2002) What is newsworthy? Longitudinal study of the reporting of medical research in two British newspapers. British Medical Journal 325: 81–84.
Beck U (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
Beck U (1999) World Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity.
Bodmer W and Mackie R (1997) Book of Man: The Human Genome Project and the Quest to Discover Our Genetic Heritage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brossard D (2013) New media landscapes and the science information consumer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110: 14096–14101.
Brossard D and Scheufele DA (2013) Science, new media, and the public. Science 339: 40–42.
Cook G, Robbins PT and Pieri E (2006) ‘Words of mass destruction’: British newspaper coverage of the genetically modified food debate, expert and non‐expert reactions. Public Understanding of Science 15 (1): 5–29.
Du L, Kamenova K and Caulfield T (2015) The gene patent controversy on Twitter: a case study of Twitter users' responses to the CHEO lawsuit against Long QT gene patents. BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1): 1–5.
Durant J, Bauer M and Gaskell G (eds) (1998) Biotechnology in the Public Sphere: A European Sourcebook. London: Science Museum.
Durant J and Lindsey N (2000) The Great GM Food Debate [Online], Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology. Available at: http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/POST‐Report‐11 (accessed 1 February 2016).
Entman RM (1991) Framing U.S. coverage of international news: contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air incidents. Journal of Communication 41: 6–27.
Fishman M (1980) Manufacturing the News. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Gandy OH (1982) Beyond Agenda Setting: Information Subsidies and Public Policy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Goode L (2009) Social news, citizen journalism and democracy. New Media & Society 11 (8): 1287–1305.
Hall S (1980) Encoding/decoding. In: Hall S, Hobson D, Lowe A and Willis P (eds) Culture, Media, Language, pp. 128–138. London: Hutchinson.
Hansen A (2010) Environment, Media and Communication. Abingdon: Routledge.
Haran J, Kitzinger J, McNeil M and O'Riordan K (2008) Human Cloning in the Media: From Science Fiction to Science Practice. London: Routledge.
Holliman R (2004) Media coverage of cloning: a study of media content, production and reception. Public Understanding of Science 13: 107–130.
Holliman R and Jensen E (2009) (In)authentic science and (im)partial publics: (Re)constructing the science outreach and public engagement agenda. In: Holliman R, Whitelegg L, Scanlon E, Smidt S and Thomas J (eds) Investigating Science Communication in the Information Age: Implications for Public Engagement and Popular Media, pp. 35–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology (2000) Third Report on Science and Society. London: House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology.
Ipsos MORI (2014) Public Attitudes to Science 2014 [Online]. Available at: https://www.ipsos‐mori.com/Assets/Docs/Polls/pas‐2014‐main‐report.pdf (accessed 5 January 2016).
Irwin A (2001) Constructing the scientific citizen: science and democracy in the biosciences. Public Understanding of Science 10 (1): 1–18.
Irwin A (2006) The politics of talk: coming to terms with ‘new’ scientific governance. Social Studies of Science 36 (2): 299–320.
Jaroff L (1989) The gene hunt. Time, 20 March.
Jensen E and Weasel LH (2006) Abortion rhetoric in American news coverage of human cloning. New Genetics and Society 25: 305–324.
Jensen E (2008a) Through thick and thin: rationalizing the public bioethical debate over therapeutic cloning. Clinical Ethics 3: 194–198.
Jensen E (2008b) The Dao of human cloning: hope, fear and hype in the UK press and popular films. Public Understanding of Science 17: 123–143.
Jensen E (2009) Review: human cloning in the media. Public Understanding of Science 18: 373–374.
Jensen E and Wagoner B (2009) A cyclical model of social change. Culture & Psychology 15: 217–228.
Jensen E (2010) Between credulity and scepticism: sightings of the fourth estate in 21st century science journalism. Media, Culture & Society 32 (4): 615–630.
Jensen E (2012) Scientific controversies and the struggle for symbolic power. In: Wagoner B, Jensen E and Oldmeadow J (eds) Culture and Social Change: Transforming Society Through the Power of Ideas. London: Information Age.
Jensen E (2014) The Therapeutic Cloning Debate: Global Science and Journalism in the Public Sphere. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
Jensen E and Holliman R (2016) Norms and values in UK science engagement practice. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement 6: 68–88.
Kiernan V (2003) Embargoes and science news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 80: 903–920.
Machill M, Beiler M and Schmutz J (2006) The influence of video news releases on the topics reported in science journalism. Journalism Studies 7: 869–888.
Marks LA, Kalaitzandonakes N, Wilkins L and Zakharova L (2007) Mass media framing of biotechnology news. Public Understanding of Science 16: 183–203.
McCombs ME and Shaw DL (1972) The agenda‐setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly 36: 176–187.
Nelkin D (1987) Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology. New York: W. H. Freeman.
Scheufele DA (2013) Communicating science in social settings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110: 14040–14047.
Smith BK and Jensen EA (2016) Critical review of the UK's “gold standard” survey of public attitudes to science. Public Understanding of Science 25: 154–170.
Stilgoe J, Lock SJ and Wilsdon J (2014) Why should we promote public engagement with science? Public Understanding of Science 23 (1): 4–15.
Stryker JE (2002) Reporting medical information: effects of press releases and newsworthiness on medical journal articles' visibility in the news media. Preventive Medicine 35: 519–530.
Weasel LH and Jensen E (2005) Language and values in the human cloning debate: a web‐based survey of scientists and Christian fundamentalist pastors. New Genetics and Society 24: 1–14.
Wilsdon J and Willis R (2004) See‐through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream. London: DEMOS.
Allan S (2002) Media, Risk and Science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Bucchi M (1998) Science and the Media: Alternative Routes in Science Communication. London: Routledge.
Friedman SM, Dunwoody S and Rogers CL (eds) (1999) Communicating Uncertainty: Media Coverage of New and Controversial Science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erblaum Associates.
Jensen E and Holliman R (2009) Investigating science communication to inform science outreach and public engagement. In: Holliman R, Whitelegg L, Scanlon E, Smidt S and Thomas J (eds) Investigating Science Communication in the Information Age: Implications for Public Engagement and Popular Media, pp. 55–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Turney J (1998) Frankenstein's Footsteps. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
UK Parliament (2000) Science and Society. House of Lords Committee on Science and Technology, Third report.
Informing Science Outreach and Public Engagement (ISOTOPE) Website: http://isotope.open.ac.uk (accessed 16 September 2016).
Royal Society and the Royal Institution ‘Guidelines on science and health communication’ for science reporters, https://royalsociety.org/topics‐policy/publications/2001/science‐health‐communication (accessed 16 September 2016).