Public and Professional Understandings of Genetics


Knowledge generated by human genetic research is understood and interpreted differently by different population groups and a range of concerns about developments is also raised. Public and professional understandings are both relevant in the context of the social issues that genetics raises for human health and for clinical practice.

Keywords: public understanding; public involvement; lay expertise; professional expertise; technical and social knowledge


Baars M, Henneman JH, ten Lidewij K and Leo P (2005) Deficiency of knowledge of genetics and genetic tests among general practitioners, gynaecologists, and pediatricians: a global problem. Genetics in Medicine 7(9): 605–610.

Bankhead C, Emery J, Qureshi N et al. (2001) New developments in genetics – knowledge, attitudes and information needs of practice nurses. Family Practice 18(5): 475–486.

Barns I, Schibechi R, Davison A and Shaw R (2000) What do you think about genetic medicine: facilitating sociable public discourse on developments in the new genetics. Science, Technology and Human Values 25: 283–308.

Bottorff JB, Blaine S, Carroll J et al. (2005) The educational needs and professional roles of Canadian physicians and nurses regarding genetic testing and adult onset hereditary disease. Community Genetics 8(2): 80–87.

Durant J, Hansen A and Bauer M (1996) Public understanding of the new genetics. In: Marteau T and Richards M (eds) The Troubled Helix: Social and Psychological Implications of the New Human Genetics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Fears R, Weatherall D and Poste G (1999) The impact of genetics on medical education and training. British Medical Journal 55(2): 460–470.

Gaskell G, Allum N and Stares S (2003) Europeans and Biotechnology in 2002. A report to the EC Directorate General for Research. Eurobarometer 58.0.

Godard B, Marshall J, Laberge C and Knoppers BM (2004) Strategies for consulting with the community: the cases of four large‐scale genetic databases. Science and Engineering Ethics 10(3): 457–477.

Gottweiss H (2002) Gene therapy and the public: a matter of trust. Gene Therapy 9: 667–669.

Haddow G, Laurie G, Cunningham‐Burley S and Hunter KG (2007) Tackling community concerns about commericalisation and genetic research: a modest interdisciplinary proposal. Social Science and Medicine 64: 272–282.

Hallowell N, Foster C, Eeles R, Ardern‐Jones A and Watson M (2004) Accommodating risk: responses to BRCA 1/2 genetic testing of women who have had cancer. Social Science and Medicine 59: 553–565.

Hayflick SJ, Eiff MP, Carpenter L and Steinberger J (1998) The role of primary care providers in the delivery of genetics services. Community Genetics 1: 18–22.

Henneman L, Timmermans DRM and van de Wal G (2004) Public experiences, knowledge and expectations about medical genetics and the use of genetic information. Community Genetics 7: 33–43.

Irwin A (2006) The politics of talk: coming to terms with the ‘new’ scientific governance. Social Studies of Science 36(2): 299–320.

Kerr A, Cunningham‐Burley SJ and Amos A (1997) The new genetics: professionals’ discursive boundaries. Sociological Review 45(2): 279–303.

Kerr A, Cunningham‐Burley SJ and Amos A (1998) The new genetics and health: mobilizing lay expertise. Public Understanding of Science 7: 41–60.

Kerr A, Cunningham‐Burley SJ and Tutton R (2007a) Shifting subject positions: experts and lay people in public dialogue. Social Studies of Science 37: 385–411.

Kerr A, Cunningham‐Burley SJ and Tutton R (2007b) Exploring ambivalence about genetic research and its social context. Social Theory and Health 5(1): 53–69.

Lambert H and Rose H (1996) Disembodied knowledge? Making sense of medical science. In: Irwin A and Wynne B (eds) Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Lock M, Freeman J, Sharples R and Lloyd S (2006) When it runs in the family: putting susceptibility genes in perspective. Public Understanding of Science 15: 277–300.

Miller S (2001) Public understanding of science at the crossroads. Public Understanding of Science 10: 115–120.

Office of Science and Technology and the Wellcome Trust (2001) Science and the public: a review of science communication and public attitudes toward science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science 10(3): 315–330.

Parsons E and Atkinson P (1992) Lay constructions of genetic risk. Sociology of Health and Illness 14: 439–455.

Priest SH (2006) The public opinion climate for gene technologies in Canada and the United States: competing voices, contrasting frames. Public Understanding of Science 15: 55–71.

Wertz D (1998) Eugenics is alive and well: a survey of genetic professionals around the world. Science in Context 11(3–4, Autumn – Winter): 493–510.

Wilkins‐Haug L, Erickson K, Hill K et al. (2000) Obstetrician–gynecologists’ opinions and attitudes on the role of genetics in women's health. Journal of Women's Health Gender‐Based Medicine 9: 873–879.

Wynne B (1991) Knowledge in context. Science, Technology and Human Values 16: 111–121.

Wynne B (1995) The public understanding of science. In: Jasanoff S, Markle GEJC and Pinch T (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, pp. 361–388. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Further Reading

Condit C (1999) How the public understands genetics: nondeterministic and nondiscriminatory interpretations of the ‘blueprint’ metaphor. Public Understanding of Science 8: 169–180.

Cunningham‐Burley S (2006) Public knowledge and public trust. Community Genetics 9(3): 203–210.

Cunningham‐Burley S and Boulton M (2000) The social context of the new genetics. In: Albrecht GL, Fitzpatrick R and Scrimshaw SC (eds) The Handbook of Social Studies in Health and Medicine, chap. 1.11 pp. 173–187. London, UK: Sage.

Garland MJ (1999) Experts and the public: a needed partnership for genetic policy. Public Understanding of Science 8: 241–354.

Giardiello FM, Brensinger JD, Petersen GM et al. (1997) The use and interpretation of commercial APC gene testing for familial adenomatous polyposis. New England Journal of Medicine 336: 823–827.

Hietala M, Hakone A, Ro A et al. (1995) Attitudes towards genetic testing among the general population and relatives of patients with severe genetic disease: a survey from Finland. American Journal of Human Genetics 566: 1493–1500.

Kerr A, Cunningham‐Burley SJ and Amos A (1998) Eugenics and the new genetics in Britain: examining contemporary professionals’ accounts. Science, Technology and Human Values 23(2): 175–198.

Macintyre S (1995) The public understanding of science or the scientific understanding of the public? A review of the social context of the ‘new genetics’. Public Understanding of Science 4: 223–232.

Michael M and Carter S (2001) The facts about fictions and vice versa: public understanding of human genetics. Science as Culture 10(1): 5–32.

Prevalin DJ (2001) Genomics Survey Scoping Study, Institute for Social and Economic Research. Colchester, UK: University of Essex Press.

Richards M (1997) It runs in the family: lay knowledge about inheritance. In: Clarke A and Parsons E (eds) Culture, Kinship and Genes: Towards a Cross Cultural Genetics. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan Publishers Limited.

Rose PW, Watson E, Yudkin P et al. (2001) Referral of patients with a family history of breast/ovarian cancer – GPs’ knowledge and expectations. Family Practice 18(5): 487–490.

Singer E, Corning A and Lamias M (1998) Trends: genetic testing, engineering, and therapy – awareness and attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly 62: 633–644.

Turney J (1995) The public understanding of genetics – where next? European Journal of Genetics and Society 1: 5–10.

Vilatela MEA, Morales AO, de al Cadena CG et al. (1999) Predictive and prenatal diagnosis of Huntington's disease: attitudes of Mexican neurologists, psychiatrists and psychologists. Archives of Medical Research 30: 320–324.

Walter F, Kinmonth AL, Hyland F et al. (2001) Experiences and expectations of the new genetics in relation to familial risk of breast cancer: a comparison of the views of GPS and practice nurses. Family Practice 18(5): 491–494.

Wynne B (1992) Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science 1: 281–304.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Cunningham‐Burley, Sarah(Dec 2008) Public and Professional Understandings of Genetics. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0005865.pub2]