Serine Proteases

Abstract

Serine proteases are enzymes that utilize a nucleophilic hydroxyl group donated from a serine amino acid side‐chain to hydrolyse the peptide bond of a substrate. Serine proteases mediate diverse biological processes from nonspecific digestion to highly regulated specific protein processing.

Keywords: enzyme; catalysis; proteolysis; protease; peptidase

Figure 1.

Catalytic triads of aspartic acid, histidine and serine in four unrelated protease folds. Catalytic residues are shown in black. (a) Clan PA proteases such as trypsin (PDB ID 1OS8) are the most common serine protease in the human genome. (b) Few examples of clan SB proteases are found in the human genome, yet play critical roles in protein processing. The fold is shared with subtilisin (PDB ID 1SCN), an enzyme that has been the subject of intense protein engineering studies. (c) Prolyl oligopeptidase (PDB ID 1QFS) from clan SC is an example of the catalytically diverse α/β‐hydrolase fold. A seven‐bladed propeller caps the active site (not shown) of this protease to restrict selectivity of this enzyme towards oligopeptide substrates not longer than 30 amino acids. (d) Several members of clan SK are responsible for intracellular protein levels in bacteria, which lack proteasomes. For example, only one monomer of ClpP (PDB ID 1TYF) is shown of a homooligomer of 14 monomers that combine to yield a large central cavity for polypeptide destruction.

Figure 2.

Catalytic mechanism of serine proteases. A strong nucleophile results from the concerted activity of the histidine imidazole and carboxyl group of aspartic acid on a serine hydroxyl group. Residues are labelled according to chymotrypsin numbering. Formation of a tetrahedral intermediate is the key conformational step for both acylation and deacylation. In many serine proteases, an analogous residue to Asp102 plays a diminished or absent role. Many protease families employ a dyad mechanism where creation of the nucleophilic serine results from a pairing with either histidine or lysine. The catalytic mechanism is similar irrespective of dyad or triad chemistry.

close

References

Blow DM, Birktoft JJ and Hartley BS (1969) Role of a buried acid group in the mechanism of action of chymotrypsin. Nature 221: 337–340.

Bryan PN (2000) Protein engineering of subtilisin. Biochemistry and Biophysical Acta 1543: 203–222.

Dodson G and Wlodawer A (1998) Catalytic triads and their relatives. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 23: 347–352.

Hedstrom L (2002) Serine protease mechanism and specificity. Chemical Review 102: 4501–4524.

Kelly JA and Kuzin AP (1995) The refined crystallographic structure of a DD‐peptidase penicillin‐target enzyme at 1.6 A resolution. Journal of Molecular Biology 254: 223–236.

Krem MM, Rose T and Di Cera E (1999) The C‐terminal sequence encodes function in serine proteases. Journal of Biological Chemistry 274: 28063–28066.

Luo Y, Pfuetzner RA, Mosimann S et al. (2001) Crystal structure of LexA: a conformational switch for regulation of self‐cleavage. Cell 106: 585–594.

Nardini M and Dijkstra BW (1999) Alpha/beta hydrolase fold enzymes: the family keeps growing. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 9: 732–737.

Neurath H (1957) The activation of zymogens. Advances in Protein Chemistry 12: 320–386.

Otlewski J, Jelen F, Zakrzewska M and Oleksy A (2005) The many faces of protease‐protein inhibitor interaction. EMBO Journal 7: 1303–1310.

Page MJ and Di Cera E (2006) Role of Na+ and K+ in enzyme function. Physiological Review 86: 1049–1092.

Polgár L (2005) The catalytic triad of serine peptidases. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 62: 2161–2172.

Puente XS, Sanchez LM, Overall CM and Lopez‐Otin C (2003) Human and mouse proteases: a comparative genomic approach. Nature Review of Genetics 4: 544–558.

Rawlings ND, Morton FR and Barrett AJ (2006) MEROPS: the peptidase database. Nucleic Acids Research 34: D270–D272.

Rea D and Fülöp V (2006) Structure‐function properties of prolyl oligopeptidase family enzymes. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics 44: 349–365.

Rockwell NC and Thorner JW (2004) The kindest cuts of all: crystal structures of Kex2 and furin reveal secrets of precursor processing. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 29: 80–87.

Rotanova TV, Botos I, Melnikov EE et al. (2006) Slicing a protease: structural features of the ATP‐dependent Lon proteases gleaned from investigations of isolated domains. Protein Sciences 15: 1815–1828.

The MEROPS Database http://www.merops.ac.uk

Urban S (2006) Rhomboid proteins: conserved membrane proteases with divergent biological functions. Genes and Development 20: 3054–3068.

Wang J, Hartling JA and Flanagan JM (1997) The structure of ClpP at 2.3 A resolution suggests a model for ATP‐dependent proteolysis. Cell 91: 447–456.

Wang Y, Zhang Y and Ha Y (2006) Crystal structure of a rhomboid family intramembrane protease. Nature 444: 179–180.

Wright CS, Alden RA and Kraut J (1969) Structure of subtilisin BPN’ at 2.5 angstrom resolution. Nature 221: 235–242.

Further Reading

RCSB Protein Databank (PDB) http://www.pdb.org

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Page, Michael J, and Cera, Enrico Di(Sep 2007) Serine Proteases. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0005902.pub2]