Nucleolar Dominance

Nucleolar dominance is an epigenetic phenomenon in plant and animal hybrids that describes the failure to form nucleoli, the sites of ribosome synthesis, on chromosomes inherited from one parent. The molecular basis for nucleolar dominance is the reversible silencing of ribosomal RNA genes transcribed by RNA polymerase I. These genes are clustered at loci spanning millions of base pairs, making nucleolar dominance one of the most extensive known chromosomal-silencing phenomena.

Keywords: gene silencing; epigenetic phenomena; ribosomal RNA; RNA polymerase I; nucleolus organizer

Figure 1. Discovery of nucleolar dominance as the hybridization-induced absence of a secondary constriction at the nucleolus organizer region (NOR) of metaphase chromosomes. Based on the observations of Navashin (1934) and McClintock (1934), haploid chromosome sets of three ‘pure’ species and their hybrids are shown. Each species has a chromosome with an NOR that forms a secondary constriction at metaphase. In hybrids, often the NOR from only one progenitor forms the characteristic secondary constriction. In the example shown, the NOR of species A is dominant in an A–B hybrid, the NOR of species B is dominant in a B–C hybrid and the NOR of species A is dominant in an A–C hybrid. Only actively transcribed NORs form a secondary constriction at metaphase, apparently due to a physical or enzymatic function of the nucleolus interfering with chromosome condensation.
Figure 2. A silent set of ribosomal (rRNA) genes subjected to nucleolar dominance can be derepressed by 5-aza-2¢-deoxycytosine (Aza-dC), an inhibitor of cytosine methylation or by trichostatin A (trichostatin), an inhibitor of histone deacetylation. This is demonstrated using Brassica napus, the allotetraploid hybrid of B. rapa and B. oleracea, in which rRNA genes inherited from B. oleracea are repressed (compare lanes 3 and 7). Brassica napus seeds were germinated on a medium containing no additions (lanes 3 and 7), or on a medium containing 5-aza-2¢-deoxycytosine (lanes 4 and 8), trichostatin A (lanes 5 and 9) or both chemicals (lanes 6 and 10). Plants were harvested after 2 weeks in culture and an equal aliquot of RNA from each treatment was hybridized to B. rapa (lanes 3–6, 12) or B. oleracea-specific (lanes 7–11) probes and subjected to S1 nuclease protection analysis to detect transcripts from the genes inherited from the two progenitors. RNA isolated from B. oleracea and B. rapa (lanes 11 and 12) served as controls. Lanes 1 and 2 show sequencing ladders used as size markers. Note that 5-aza-2¢-deoxycytosine and trichostatin A together are not significantly more effective at derepressing the B. oleracea genes than is either chemical alone, suggesting that DNA methylation and histone deacetylation are partners in the same repression pathway. (Reprinted with permission from Chen and Pikaard, 1997b.)
close
 References
    Chen ZJ and Pikaard CS (1997a) Transcriptional analysis of nucleolar dominance in polyploid plants: biased expression/silencing of progenitor rRNA genes is developmentally regulated in Brassica. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94: 3442–3447.
    Chen ZJ and Pikaard CS (1997b) Epigenetic silencing of RNA polymerase I transcription: a role for DNA methylation and histone modification in nucleolar dominance. Genes and Development 11: 2124–2136.
    Durica DS and Krider HM (1978) Studies on the ribosomal RNA cistrons in Drosophila hybrids. II. Heterochromatic regions mediating nucleolar dominance. Genetics 89: 37–64.
    Frieman M, Chen ZJ, Saez-Vasquez J, Shen LA and Pikaard CS (1999) RNA polymerase I transcription in a Brassica interspecific hybrid and its progenitors: tests of transcription factor involvement in nucleolar dominance. Genetics 152: 451–460.
    Honjo T and Reeder RH (1973) Preferential transcription of Xenopus laevis ribosomal RNA in interspecies hybrids between Xenopus laevis and Xenopus mulleri. Journal of Molecular Biology 80: 217–228.
    Lewis MS and Pikaard CS (2001) Restricted chromosomal silencing in nucleolar dominance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98: 14536–14540.
    McClintock B (1934) The relationship of a particular chromosomal element to the development of the nucleoli in Zea mays. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie 21: 294–328.
    Navashin M (1934) Chromosomal alterations caused by hybridization and their bearing upon certain general genetic problems. Cytologia 5: 169–203.
    Reeder RH (1985) Mechanisms of nucleolar dominance in animals and plants. Journal of Cell Biology 101: 2013–2016.
    Reeder RH and Roan JG (1984) The mechanism of nucleolar dominance in Xenopus hybrids. Cell 38: 39–44.
    Viera R, Mello-Sampayo T and Viegas W (1990) Genetic control of 1R nucleolus organizer region expression in the presence of wheat genomes. Genome 33: 713–718.
    Wallace H and Langridge WHR (1971) Differential amphiplasty and the control of ribosomal RNA synthesis. Heredity 27: 1–13.
 Further Reading
    Flavell RB (1986) The structure and control of expression of ribosomal RNA genes. Oxford Surveys of Plant Molecular and Cell Biology 3: 252–274.
    Hannan KM, Hannan RD and Rothblum LI (1998) Transcription by RNA polymerase I. Frontiers in Bioscience 3: 376–398.
    Kadonaga JT (1998) Eukaryotic transcription: an interlaced network of transcription factors and chromatin-modifying machines. Cell 92: 307–313.
    book Neves N, Castilho A, Silva M, Heslop-Harrison JS and Viegas W (1997) "Genomic interactions: gene expression, DNA methylation and nuclear architecture". In: Henriques-Gil N, Parker JS and Puertas MJ (eds.) Chromosomes Today, vol. 12, pp. 182–200. London: Chapman & Hall
    Paule MR and White RJ (2000) Survey and summary: transcription by RNA polymerases I and III. Nucleic Acids Research 28: 1283–1298.
    Pikaard CS (2000) The epigenetics of nucleolar dominance. Trends in Genetics 16: 495–500.
    Pikaard CS (2000) Nucleolar dominance: uniparental gene silencing on a multi-megabase scale in genetic hybrids. Plant Molecular Biology 43: 163–177.
    Scheer U and Weisenberger D (1994) The nucleolus. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 6: 354–359.
    Shaw PJ and Jordan EG (1995) The nucleolus. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 11: 93–121.
Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Pikaard, Craig S(Jan 2006) Nucleolar Dominance. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1038/npg.els.0005976]