Aberrant Patterns of DNA Methylation in Cancer


Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) methylation is an epigenetic mechanism involved in the regulation of gene expression and preservation of genome stability in normal cells. Alterations of DNA methylation code have been associated with the development and progression of many diseases, including cancer. Novel technologies allow genome‐wide interrogation of methylation patterns. Data on different types of cancer are accumulating; however, elucidation of the consequences of all observed demethylation or methylation events and understanding their associations with other genomic aberrations present great challenges for the future research. Nevertheless, several findings regarding gene silencing by hypermethylation of CpG islands in promoters of genes have been successfully transferred in clinical setting aiding in diagnosis or prognosis of different types of cancer. In addition, therapeutic application of small molecule inhibitors of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) to reverse epigenetic silencing has been proven to be beneficial for treatment of various cancers.

Key Concepts

  • Alterations of epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation, are implicated in the pathogenesis of many diseases, including cancer.
  • DNA methylation of CpG dinucleotides distributed in the genome can either repress or enable transcription of genes, depending on the location of CpGs and the level of methylation.
  • DNA methylation can be influenced by different internal and external factors, which contribute to the establishment of heterogeneous DNA methylation patterns in cancers.
  • Observed heterogeneity of methylation profiles between tumours and within tumours represents an obstacle in obtaining relevant biological information that could be translated into the knowledge of molecular mechanisms leading to cancer.
  • Advancements in genome‐wide methodologies and bioinformatic tools used for deciphering the consequences of altered DNA methylation patterns will enable deeper understanding of molecular mechanisms leading to the development of cancer.

Keywords: cancer; CpG island; CIMP phenotype; DNA methylation; epigenetics; gene expression; gene silencing; genomic instability; tumour heterogeneity

Figure 1. Distribution of DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) methylation in specific gene regions. Data were obtained from 17 somatic tissues. Each gene region is divided into bins that correspond to the percentage of methylation (β values) with 0.1 intervals. The area of each bin corresponds to total number of CpGs. The overall distributions and the means of β values of the CpGs in each gene region are shown as box plots. The numbers on the x‐axis correspond to total number of CpGs in each gene region. Gene regions were classified as TSS200 (200 nucleotides upstream of TSS), TSS1500 (1500 nucleotides upstream of TSS), 5′‐untranslated region (5′‐UTR), first exon, gene body (all exons and introns except the first exon) and 3′‐untranslated region (3′‐UTR). The lowest percentage of methylation was observed in promoter sequences (TSS1500, TSS200 and 5′‐UTR) and the first exon, whereas the most methylated regions were in the gene bodies and 3′‐UTR. Reprinted from Lokk et al. 2014 © BioMed Central distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0).
Figure 2. Distribution of CGI methylation in different genomic regions. Data were obtained from 17 somatic tissues. Each gene region is divided into bins that correspond to the percentage of methylation (β values) with 0.1 intervals. The area of each bin corresponds to total number of CpGs. The overall distributions and the means of β values of the CpGs in each genomic region are shown as box plots. The numbers on the x‐axis correspond to total number of CpGs in each gene region. CpG island‐oriented classification was as follows: CGI (CpG island), nonisland CpGs (CpG nucleotides not associated with CGIs), CGI shores (2 kb long regions on the left (north shore, Nshore) and right (south shore, Sshore) sides of CGIs), CGI shelves (regions, 2 kb upstream of north CGI shore (north shelf, Nshelf) or downstream of south CGI shore (south shelf, Sshelf)). (a), (b) and (c) represent the distribution of DNA methylation in designated regions in (a) CGI regions, (b) islands in intragenic regions and (c) islands in intergenic regions. CGIs, intergenic and intragenic islands were largely unmethylated, whereas the boundaries of CGIs, namely shores and shelves, as well as nonisland CpGs, were frequently methylated. Reprinted from Lokk et al. 2014 © BioMed Central distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0).
Figure 3. Frequency of gene methylation in colorectal neoplasia detected with quantitative methylation‐specific PCR (qMSP). The spots represent the percentage of samples showing greater than 10% methylation in colorectal cancer samples (red spots), matched nontumour tissues (green) and adenomas (purple). The size of the spots is proportional to a log2 transformation of the number of samples tested (see legend at the bottom). The histogram on the right side is showing the difference in the detection cycles between fully methylated commercial CpGenome™ DNA (Millipore) and wbc DNA (DNA obtained from pooled peripheral blood of healthy individuals) (ΔCt ). An asterisk denotes cases where reaction products from wbc DNA were not detected. Reprinted from Mitchell et al. 2014 © BioMed Central distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0).


Abernethy A, Abrahams E, Barker A, et al. (2014) Turning the tide against cancer through sustained medical innovation: the pathway to progress. Clinical Cancer Research 20 (5): 1081–1086.

Akey DT, Akey JM, Zhang K and Jin L (2002) Assaying DNA methylation based on high‐throughput melting curve approaches. Genomics 80 (4): 376–384.

Auclair G, Guibert S, Bender A and Weber M (2014) Ontogeny of CpG island methylation and specificity of DNMT3 methyltransferases during embryonic development in the mouse. Genome Biology 15 (12): 545.

Baylin SB and Jones PA (2011) A decade of exploring the cancer epigenome – biological and translational implications. Nature Reviews Cancer 11: 726–734.

Bestor TH, Edwards JR and Boulard M (2015) Notes on the role of dynamic DNA methylation in mammalian development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112 (22): 6796–6799.

Bibikova M, Barnes B, Tsan C, et al. (2011) High density DNA methylation array with single CpG site resolution. Genomics 98 (4): 288–295.

Burrell RA, McGranahan N, Bartek J and Swanton C (2013) The causes and consequences of genetic heterogeneity in cancer evolution. Nature 501 (7467): 338–345.

Ellis L, Atadja PW and Johnstone RW (2009) Epigenetics in cancer: targeting chromatin modifications. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 8 (6): 1409–1420.

Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. International Journal of Cancer 136 (5): E359–E386.

Frommer M, McDonald LE, Millar DS, et al. (1992) A genomic sequencing protocol that yields a positive display of 5‐methylcytosine residues in individual DNA strands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 89 (5): 1827–1831.

Hanahan D and Weinberg RA (2000) The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100 (1): 57–70.

Hanahan D and Weinberg RA (2011) Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144 (5): 646–674.

Hansen KD, Timp W, Bravo HC, et al. (2011) Increased methylation variation in epigenetic domains across cancer types. Nature Genetics 43 (8): 768–775.

Heichman KA and Warren JD (2012) DNA methylation biomarkers and their utility for solid cancer diagnostics. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine 50 (10): 1707–1721.

Heyn H and Esteller M (2015) An adenine code for DNA: a second life for N6‐methyladenine. Cell 161 (4): 710–713.

Huang Y and Rao A (2014) Connections between TET proteins and aberrant DNA modification in cancer. Trends in Genetics 30 (10): 464–474.

Illingworth RS, Gruenewald‐Schneider U, Webb S, et al. (2010) Orphan CpG islands identify numerous conserved promoters in the mammalian genome. PLoS Genetics 6 (9): e1001134.

Inbar‐Feigenberg M, Choufani S, Butcher DT, Roifman M and Weksberg R (2013) Basic concepts of epigenetics. Fertility and Sterility 99 (3): 607–615.

Irizarry RA, Ladd‐Acosta C, Wen B, et al. (2009) The human colon cancer methylome shows similar hypo‐ and hypermethylation at conserved tissue‐specific CpG island shores. Nature Genetics 41 (2): 178–186.

Jin B, Li Y and Robertson KD (2011) DNA methylation: superior or subordinate in the epigenetic hierarchy? Genes & Cancer 2 (6): 607–617.

Kristensen LS, Mikeska T, Krypuy M and Dobrovic A (2008) Sensitive Melting Analysis after Real Time‐ Methylation Specific PCR (SMART‐MSP): high‐throughput and probe‐free quantitative DNA methylation detection. Nucleic Acids Research 36 (7): e42.

Laird PW (2010) Principles and challenges of genomewide DNA methylation analysis. Nature Reviews Genetics 11 (3): 191–203.

Lee ST and Wiemels JL (2016) Genome‐wide CpG island methylation and intergenic demethylation propensities vary among different tumor sites. Nucleic Acids Research 44 (3): 1105–1117.

Lokk K, Modhukur V, Rajashekar B, et al. (2014) DNA methylome profiling of human tissues identifies global and tissue‐specific methylation patterns. Genome Biology 15 (4): r54.

Ma Y, Wang X and Jin H (2013) Methylated DNA and microRNA in body fluids as biomarkers for cancer detection. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 14 (5): 10307–10331.

Merid SK, Goranskaya D and Alexeyenko A (2014) Distinguishing between driver and passenger mutations in individual cancer genomes by network enrichment analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 15: 308.

Mikeska T, Candiloro IL and Dobrovic A (2010) The implications of heterogeneous DNA methylation for the accurate quantification of methylation. Epigenomics 2 (4): 561–573.

Mikeska T and Craig JM (2014) DNA methylation biomarkers: cancer and beyond. Genes (Basel) 5 (3): 821–864.

Mitchell SM, Ross JP, Drew HR, et al. (2014) A panel of genes methylated with high frequency in colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer 14: 54.

Nygren AO, Ameziane N, Duarte HM, et al. (2005) Methylation‐specific MLPA (MS‐MLPA): simultaneous detection of CpG methylation and copy number changes of up to 40 sequences. Nucleic Acids Research 33 (14): e128.

Patil V, Ward RL and Hesson LB (2014) The evidence for functional non‐CpG methylation in mammalian cells. Epigenetics 9 (6): 823–828.

Sandoval J, Heyn H, Moran S, et al. (2011) Validation of a DNA methylation microarray for 450,000 CpG sites in the human genome. Epigenetics 6 (6): 692–702.

Sandoval J and Esteller M (2012) Cancer epigenomics: beyond genomics. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 22 (1): 50–55.

Saxonov S, Berg P and Brutlag DL (2006) A genome‐wide analysis of CpG dinucleotides in the human genome distinguishes two distinct classes of promoters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103 (5): 1412–1417.

Stroud H, Feng S, Morey Kinney S, Pradhan S and Jacobsen SE (2011) 5‐Hydroxymethylcytosine is associated with enhancers and gene bodies in human embryonic stem cells. Genome Biology 12 (6): R54.

Szwagierczak A, Brachmann A, Schmidt CS, et al. (2011) Characterization of PvuRts1I endonuclease as a tool to investigate genomic 5‐hydroxymethylcytosine. Nucleic Acids Research 39 (12): 5149–5156.

TCGA (2012) Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature 487 (7407): 330–337.

TCGA (2014) Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma. Nature 513 (7517): 202–209.

Timp W and Feinberg AP (2013) Cancer as a dysregulated epigenome allowing cellular growth advantage at the expense of the host. Nature Reviews Cancer 13 (7): 497–510.

Tomasetti C, Marchionni L, Nowak MA, Parmigiani G and Vogelstein B (2015) Only three driver gene mutations are required for the development of lung and colorectal cancers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112 (1): 118–123.

Tomczak K, Czerwinska P and Wiznerowicz M (2015) The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA): an immeasurable source of knowledge. ContemporaryOoncology (Poznań, Poland) 19 (1A): A68–A77.

Umer M and Herceg Z (2013) Deciphering the epigenetic code: an overview of DNA methylation analysis methods. Antioxidants and Redox Signaling 18 (15): 1972–1986.

Varley KE, Gertz J, Bowling KM, et al. (2013) Dynamic DNA methylation across diverse human cell lines and tissues. Genome Research 23 (3): 555–567.

Wee EJ, Rauf S, Shiddiky MJ, Dobrovic A and Trau M (2015) DNA ligase‐based strategy for quantifying heterogeneous DNA methylation without sequencing. Clinical Chemistry 61 (1): 163–171.

Wen B, Wu H, Shinkai Y, Irizarry RA and Feinberg AP (2009) Large histone H3 lysine 9 dimethylated chromatin blocks distinguish differentiated from embryonic stem cells. Nature Genetics 41: 246–250.

Witte T, Plass C and Gerhauser C (2014) Pan‐cancer patterns of DNA methylation. Genome Medicine 6 (8): 66.

Wu H and Zhang Y (2014) Reversing DNA methylation: mechanisms, genomics, and biological functions. Cell 156 (1–2): 45–68.

Wu TP, Wang T, Seetin MG, et al. (2016) DNA methylation on N(6)‐adenine in mammalian embryonic stem cells. Nature 532 (7599): 329–333.

You JS and Jones PA (2012) Cancer genetics and epigenetics: two sides of the same coin? Cancer Cell 22 (1): 9–20.

Zullo JM, Demarco IA, Pique‐Regi R, et al. (2012) DNA sequence‐dependent compartmentalization and silencing of chromatin at the nuclear lamina. Cell 149 (7): 1474–1487.

Further Reading

Bhattacharjee D, Shenoy S and Bairy KL (2016) DNA methylation and chromatin remodeling: the blueprint of cancer epigenetics. Scientifica (Cairo) 2016: 6072357.

Cohen AL, Holmen SL and Colman H (2013) IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 13 (5): 345.

Edgar R, Tan PP, Portales‐Casamar E and Pavlidis P (2014) Meta‐analysis of human methylomes reveals stably methylated sequences surrounding CpG islands associated with high gene expression. Epigenetics & Chromatin 7 (1): 28.

Guillamot M, Cimmino L and Aifantis I (2016) The impact of DNA methylation in hematopoietic malignancies. Trends in Cancer 2 (2): 70–83.

Hanahan D (2014) Rethinking the war on cancer. Lancet 383 (9916): 558–563.

Huang S, Ernberg I and Kauffman S (2009) Cancer attractors: a systems view of tumors from a gene network dynamics and developmental perspective. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 20 (7): 869–876.

Levis M (2013) Targeting IDH: the next big thing in AML. Blood 122 (16): 2770–2771.

Teschendorff AE, Gao Y, Jones A, et al. (2016) DNA methylation outliers in normal breast tissue identify field defects that are enriched in cancer. Nature Communications 7: 10478.

Warton K, Mahon KL and Samimi G (2016) Methylated circulating tumor DNA in blood: power in cancer prognosis and response. Endocrine‐Related Cancer 23 (3): R157–R171.

Web Links

ClinicalTrials.gov ‐ A service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health, https://clinicaltrials.gov/

MethDB ‐ the database for DNA methylation and environmental epigenetic effects, http://www.methdb.de/

QIASure Methylation test description, https://www.qiagen.com/si/about‐us/press‐releases/pressreleaseview?ID=%7bB26F3DC6‐B17C‐4346‐9F4B‐41BFDD1C6BE1%7d&lang=en

The Cancer Genome Atlas Database, http://cancergenome.nih.gov/

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Hudler, Petra(Nov 2016) Aberrant Patterns of DNA Methylation in Cancer. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0006160]