| References |
|
|
Blower MD,
Sullivan BA and
Karpen GH
(2002)
Conserved organization of centromeric chromatin in flies and humans.
Developmental Cell
2:
319–330.
|
|
|
Cahill DP,
Lengauer C,
Yu J, et al.
(1998)
Mutations of mitotic checkpoint genes in human cancers.
Nature
392:
300–303.
|
|
|
Clarke L and
Carbon J
(1980)
Isolation of a yeast centromere and construction of functional small circular chromosomes.
Nature
287:
504–509.
|
|
|
Harrington JJ,Van Bokkelen G,
Mays RW,
Gustashaw K and
Willard HF
(1997)
Formation of de novo centromeres and construction of first‐generation human artificial microchromosomes.
Nature Genetics
15:
345–355.
|
|
|
Hoyt MA,
Totis L and
Roberts BT
(1991).
S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function.
Cell
66:
507–517.
|
|
|
Ikeno M,
Grimes B,
Okazaki T, et al.
(1998)
Construction of YAC‐based mammalian artificial chromosomes.
Nature Biotechnology
16:
431–439.
|
|
|
Li R and
Murray AW
(1991)
Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast[published erratum appears in Cell (1994) Oct 21; 79(2): following 388].
Cell
66:
519–531.
|
|
|
Li X and
Nicklas RB
(1995)
Mitotic forces control a cell‐cycle checkpoint.
Nature
373:
630–632.
|
|
|
McEwen BF,
Hsieh CE,
Mattheyses AL and
Rieder CL
(1998)
A new look at kinetochore structure in vertebrate somatic cells using high‐pressure freezing and freeze substitution.
Chromosoma
107:
366–375.
|
|
|
Moroi Y,
Peebles C,
Fritzler MJ,
Steigerwald J and
Tan EM
(1980)
Autoantibody to centromere (kinetochore) in scleroderma sera.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
77:
1627–1631.
|
|
|
Rieder CL,
Cole RW,
Khodjakov A and
Sluder G
(1995)
The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores.
Journal of Cell Biology
130:
941–948.
|
|
|
du Sart D,
Cancilla MR,
Earle E, et al.
(1997)
A functional neo‐centromere formed through activation of a latent human centromere and consisting of non‐α‐satellite DNA.
Nature Genetics
16:
144–153.
|
| Further Reading |
|
|
Choo KH
(2001)
Domain organization at the centromere and neocentromere.
Developmental Cell
1:
165–177.
|
|
|
Henikoff S,
Ahmad K and
Malik HS
(2001)
The centromere paradox: stable inheritance with rapidly evolving DNA.
Science
293:
1098–1102.
|
|
|
Hoyt MA
(2001)
A new view of the spindle checkpoint.
Journal of Cell Biology
154:
909–911.
|
|
|
Jallepalli PV and
Lengauer C
(2001)
Chromosome segregation and cancer: cutting through the mystery.
Nature Reviews Cancer
1:
109–117.
|
|
|
Kitagawa K and
Hieter P
(2001)
Evolutionary conservation between budding yeast and human kinetochores.
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
2:
678–687.
|
|
|
Maney T,
Ginkel LM,
Hunter AW and
Wordeman L
(2000)
The kinetochore of higher eucaryotes: a molecular view.
International Review of Cytology
194:
67–131.
|
|
|
Nasmyth K
(2001)
Disseminating the genome: joining, resolving, and separating sister chromatids during mitosis and meiosis.
Annual Reviews in Genetics
35:
673–745.
|
|
|
Pidoux AL and
Allshire RC
(2000)
Centromeres: getting a grip of chromosomes.
Current Opinion in Cell Biology
12:
308–319.
|
|
|
book
Rieder CL (ed.)
(1998)
Mitosis and Meiosis. Methods in Cell Biology,vol.
61.
San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
|
|
|
Rieder CL and
Salmon ED
(1998)
The vertebrate cell kinetochore and its roles during mitosis.
Trends in Cell Biology
8:
310–318.
|
|
|
Skibbens RV and
Hieter P
(1998)
Kinetochores and the checkpoint mechanism that monitors for defects in the chromosome segregation machinery.
Annual Reviews in Genetics
32:
307–337.
|
|
|
Sullivan BA,
Blower MD and
Karpen GH
(2001)
Determining centromere identity: cyclical stories and forking paths.
Nature Reviews Genetics
2:
584–596.
|
|
|
Tyler‐Smith C and
Floridia G
(2000)
Many paths to the top of the mountain: diverse evolutionary solutions to centromere structure.
Cell
102:
5–8.
|
|
|
Wassmann K and
Benezra R
(2001)
Mitotic checkpoints: from yeast to cancer.
Current Opinion in Genetics and Development
11:
83–90.
|
| Web Links |
|
|
ePath
BUB1 budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 homolog beta (BUB1B); LocusID: 701. LocusLink: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/LocusLink/LocRpt.cgi?l=701
|
|
|
ePath
BUB1 budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 homolog (BUB1); LocusID: 699. LocusLink: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/LocusLink/LocRpt.cgi?l=699
|
|
|
ePath
Centromere protein A, 17 kDa (CENPA); LocusID: 1058. LocusLink: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/LocusLink/LocRpt.cgi?l=1058
|
|
|
ePath
Centromere protein B, 80 kDa (CENPB); LocusID: 1059. LocusLink: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/LocusLink/LocRpt.cgi?l=1059
|
|
|
ePath
ZW10 homolog, centromere/kinetochore protein (ZW10); LocusID: 9183. LocusLink: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/LocusLink/LocRpt.cgi?l=9183
|
|
|
ePath
BUB1 budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 homolog (BUB1); MIM number: 602452. OMIM: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin‐post/Omim/dispmim?602452
|
|
|
ePath
BUB1 budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 homolog beta (BUB1B); MIM number: 602860. OMIM: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin‐post/Omim/dispmim?602860
|
|
|
ePath
Centromere protein A, 17 kDa (CENPA); MIM number: 117139. OMIM: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin‐post/Omim/dispmim?117139
|
|
|
ePath
Centromere protein B, 80 kDa (CENPB); MIM number: 117140. OMIM: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin‐post/Omim/dispmim?117140
|
|
|
ePath
ZW10 homolog, centromere/kinetochore protein (ZW10); MIM number: 9183. OMIM: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin‐post/Omim/dispmim?9183
|