Disordered Proteins

Disordered proteins and disordered protein regions fail to form specific three-dimensional (3D) structure as monomers under physiological conditions, existing instead as dynamic structural ensembles. These dynamical proteins and regions often carry out biological function. Just as amino acid sequence codes for 3D structure, amino acid sequence also codes for the failure of a protein or regions to form specific structure. A major goal in the coming years will be to understand sequence-to-function relationships for disordered proteins.

Keywords: unfolded; flexible; unstructured; protein function

Figure 1. One disordered protein, two partners. The regions of the extreme C-terminal sequence of p53 (SwissProt ID P53_HUMAN) that bind to both Cyclin A2 (green bar) and to S100 (red bar) are shown. Also shown are renderings of the corresponding experimental determined complexes, where molecular surfaces of cyclin A2 (blue) and S100 (orange) are shown bound to ribbon representations of p53 (green and red, respectively). Structures were rendered from the PDB entries 1DT7 for Cylcin A2 and 1H26 for S100. This figure was prepared by Christopher J. Oldfield from his PhD Thesis research.
Figure 2. Two disordered proteins, one partner. Shown are the chemical structures of representatives of two 14-3-3 binding motifs m1 and m2, which are R-(S/Ar)-[+]-pS-[LEAM]-P and R-X-[Y/F]-[+]-pS-[LEAM]-P, respectively. The chemical structures represent the bonds made between the binding peptides and 14-3-3, as well as solvent, where hydrophobic interactions are represented by proximity and hydrogen bonds are represented by red dashed lines. 14-3-3 residues are shown in green, crystallographic water molecules in blue and implied water molecules (i.e. exposed donors or acceptors without observed hydrogen bonds) in red. Hydrogen bonds were calculated for the m1 and m2 structures from the PDB entries 1QJB and 1QJA, respectively. This figure was prepared by Christopher J. Oldfield from his PhD Thesis research.
Figure 3. Amino acid profile for disordered proteins. (a) Composition of ordered proteins (CO), (b) composition of disordered proteins (CD), (c) relative composition of disordered proteins relative to ordered proteins, i.e. (CD–CO)/CO. Ordered proteins were taken compiled from all monomeric proteins in the Protein Quaternary Structure server (http://pqs.ebi.ac.uk) without bound ligands and clustered at 25% sequence identity, which consists of 1160 proteins with 294 297 residues with defined electron density. Disordered proteins and regions were taken from DisProt release 3.5. Amino acids are arranged from left to right in terms of increasing flexibility, where this term is estimated from amino acid residue average B-factor values. This figure was prepared by Christopher J. Oldfield from his PhD Thesis research.
Figure 4. Intrinsic disorder, protein function and alternative splicing. Binding regions for a given molecule are indicated by the corresponding colour bar(s) along the representation of full length BRCA1. BRCA1 is represented by bars where blue regions have been experimentally determined to be ordered and red regions have been experimentally determined to be disordered. Regions removed from splice variants of full-length BRCA1 are indicated by dotted lines. Partner binding regions and phosphorylation sites were gathered from the literature and from the SwissProt database, and alternatively spliced variants were taken from the representative splicing variants from the Alternative Splicing Gallery. This figure was prepared by Christopher J. Oldfield from his PhD Thesis research.
close
 References
    Armstrong CM and Bezanilla F (1977) Inactivation of the sodium channel II. Gating current experiments. Journal of General Physiology 70: 567–590.
    Brown CJ, Takayama S, Campen AM et al. (2002) Evolutionary rate heterogeneity in proteins with long disordered regions. Journal of Molecular Evolution 55: 104–110.
    Bustos DM and Iglesias AA (2006) Intrinsic disorder is a key characteristic in partners that bind 14-3-3 proteins. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 63: 35–42.
    other Daughdrill GW, Narayanaswami P, Gilmore SH, Belczyk A and Brown CJ (2007) Dynamic behavior of an intrinsically unstructured linker domain is conserved in the face of negligible amino acid sequence conservation. Journal of Molecular Evolution (In Press).
    Dosztanyi Z, Csizmok V, Tompa P and Simon I (2005) The pairwise energy content estimated from amino acid composition discriminates between folded and intrinsically unstructured proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology 347: 827–839.
    Dunker AK, Cortese MS, Romero P, Iakoucheva LM and Uversky VN (2005) Flexible nets. The roles of intrinsic disorder in protein interaction networks. Federation of European Biological Societies Journal 272: 5129–5148.
    Dunker AK, Brown CJ and Obradovic Z (2002) Identification and functions of usefully disordered proteins. Advances in Protein Chemistry 62: 25–49.
    Dyson HJ and Wright PE (2005) Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nature Reviews Molecular and Cell Biology 6: 197–208.
    Gunasekaran K, Tsai CJ and Nussinov R (2004) Analysis of ordered and disordered protein complexes reveals structural features discriminating between stable and unstable monomers. Journal of Molecular Biology 341: 1327–1341.
    Holmes KC (1983) Flexibility in tobacco mosaic virus. Ciba Foundation Symposium 93: 116–138.
    Holt C and Sawyer L (1993) Caseins as rheomorphic proteins: interpretation of primary and secondary structures of the s1-, -, and -caseins. Journal of the Chemical Society Faraday Transactions 89: 2683–2692.
    Hoshi T, Zagotta WN and Aldrich RW (1990) Biophysical and molecular mechanisms of Shaker potassium channel inactivation. Science 250: 533–538.
    Kriwacki RW, Hengst L, Tennant L, Reed SI and Wright PE (1996) Structural studies of p21Waf1/Cip1/Sdi1 in the free and Cdk2-bound state: conformational disorder mediates binding diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 93: 11504–11509.
    Oldfield CJ, Cheng Y, Cortese MS et al. (2005) Comparing and combining predictors of mostly disordered proteins. Biochemistry 44: 1989–2000.
    Peng K, Radivojac P, Vucetic S, Dunker AK and Obradovic Z (2006) Length-dependent prediction of protein intrinsic disorder. BMC Bioinformatics 7: 208.
    Podlaha O and Zhang J (2003) Positive selection on protein-length in the evolution of a primate sperm ion channel. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 100: 12241–12246.
    Rittinger K, Budman J, Xu J et al. (1999) Structural analysis of 14-3-3 phosphopeptide complexes identifies a dual role for the nuclear export signal of 14-3-3 in ligand binding. Molecular Cell 4: 153–166.
    Radivojac P, Vucetic S, O’Connor TR et al. (2006) Calmodulin signaling: analysis and prediction of a disorder-dependent molecular recognition. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 63: 398–410.
    Romero PR, Zaidi S, Fang YY et al. (2006) Alternative splicing in concert with protein intrinsic disorder enables increased functional diversity in multicellular organisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 103: 8390–8395.
    book Schulz GE (1979) "Nucleotide binding proteins". In: Balaban M (ed.) Molecular Mechanisms of Biological Recognition, pp. 79–94. New York: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press.
    Uversky VN, Gillespie JR and Fink AL (2000) Why are ‘natively unfolded’ proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions? Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 41: 415–427.
    Uversky VN, Oldfield CJ and Dunker AK (2005) Showing your ID: intrinsic disorder as an ID for recognition, regulation and cell signaling. Journal of Molecular Recognition 18: 343–384.
    Weinreb PH, Zhen W, Poon AW, Conway KA and Lansbury PT Jr (1996) NACP, a protein implicated in Alzheimer's disease and learning, is natively unfolded. Biochemistry 35: 13709–13715.
    Wootton JC (1994) Non-globular domains in protein sequences: automated segmentation using complexity measures. Computational Chemistry 18: 269–285.
    Wright PE and Dyson HJ (1999) Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure–function paradigm. Journal of Molecular Biology 293: 321–331.
 Further Reading
    book Daughdrill GW, Pielak GJ, Uversky VN and Dunker AK (2005) "Natively disordered proteins". In: Buchner J and Kiefhaber T (eds) Protein Folding Handbook, Part II, vol. 1, pp. 275–357. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley VCH.
    Demchenko AP (2001) Recognition between flexible protein molecules: induced and assisted folding. Journal of Molecular Recognition 14: 42–61.
    Dunker AK, Brown CJ, Lawson JD, Iakoucheva LM and Obradovic Z (2002) Intrinsic disorder and protein function. Biochemistry 41: 6573–6582.
    book Fleming JP and Rose GD (2005) "Conformational properties of unfolded proteins". In: Buchner J and Kiefhaber T (eds) Protein Folding Handbook, Part I, vol. 2, pp. 710–736. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley VCH.
    Namba K (2001) Roles of partly unfolded conformations in macromolecular self-assembly. Genes to Cells 6: 1–12.
    book Rose GD (2002) "Unfolded proteins". In: Richards FM, Eisenberg DS and Kuriyan J (eds) Advances in Protein Chemistry, vol. 62. New York: Academic Press.
    Spolar RS and Record MT (1994) Coupling of local folding to site-specific binding of proteins to DNA. Science 263: 777–784.
    Tompa P (2002) Intrinsically unstructured proteins. Trends in Biochemical Science 27: 527–533.
    Uversky VN (2002) Natively unfolded proteins: a point where biology waits for physics. Protein Science 11: 739–756.
    Weathers EA, Paulaitis ME, Woolf TB and Hoh JH (2007) Insights into protein structure and function from disorder-complexity space. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 66: 16–28.
Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Dunker, A Keith(Sep 2007) Disordered Proteins. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0020213]