Crop–Weed Competition

Competition from weeds is the most important of all biological factors that reduce agricultural crop yield. This occurs primarily because weeds use resources that would otherwise be available to the crop. The magnitude of yield loss is affected by many agronomic and environmental factors, but most importantly by the weed density, and time of emergence relative to the crop. Practices that (1) reduce the density of weeds or (2) maximize occupation of space or uptake of resources by the crop or (3) establish an early season size advantage of the crop over the weeds, will minimize the competitive effects of weeds on crops.

Keywords: agroecology; crop yield loss; interspecific; interference; weed management

Figure 1. Annual weeds interfere with pumpkin harvest and reduce fruit yield. The abundant seed rain ensures an abundant weed population in future years. Photo: E. Gallandt.
Figure 2. The effects of plant density on biomass in single species populations (‘monoculture’). At very low densities, there is no competition and total biomass increases linearly with density (a). As density increases, competition becomes important and the increase in biomass is less than proportional to density (curved part of graph a). At high densities further increases in density do not lead to any increase in biomass (‘Law of Constant Final Yield’). The effects of density on mean individual plant biomass are best illustrated with a log–log plot (b). The proportional increase in total biomass with density at low densities on graph (a) corresponds to the flat part of graph (b). The flat part of graph (a) corresponds to the linear decrease (slope=–1) on graph (b).
Figure 3. The right-rectangular hyperbolic model relating crop yield loss to weed density (Cousens, 1985). Crop yield loss (YL=iN/1+iN/A), where N=weed density, i and A are fit parameters with i representing the slope as N approaches zero and A the slope as N approaches infinity.
Figure 4. Results from an experiment designed to determine the ‘critical period’ for weed control. Data from two complementary experiments are plotted on the same axes. Results from one experiment show cabbage yield when the crop is maintained weed-free for 0, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 14 weeks. Results from the second experiment show cabbage yield when the crop is unweeded for 0, 2, 4, 6 and 14 weeks. Weeds present for only a short period of time have no effect on yield, and the end of the critical period marks the point at which the crop has a sufficient size advantage to be unaffected by subsequently emerging weeds. Data from Table 1, p. 854, Miller AB and Hopen HJ (1991) Critical weed-control period in seeded cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata). Weed Technology 5, 852–857.
Figure 5. Effect of sequence of seed sowing, and resulting sequence of seedling emergence, over 10 consecutive days on space, estimated as proportional to biomass, occupied by individual plants. Panels show the randomly selected positions in which seeds were sown, and the area occupied on day 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20 days, respectively. Earlier-emerging individuals preempt space from those emerging later, evident by the small amount of space occupied by seedlings sown on days 7 through 10. This figure was published by Harper JL (1977) The influence of density on yield and mortality. In: Population Biology of Plants, chap. 6. Copyright Elsevier.
close
 References
    Bleasdale JKA and Nelder JA (1960) Plant population and crop yield. Nature 188: 342.
    Callaway MB (1992) A compendium of crop varietal tolerance to weeds. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 7: 168–179.
    Connolly J (1986) On difficulties with replacement-series methodologies in mixture experiments. Journal of Applied Ecology 23: 125–137.
    Cousens R (1985) An empirical model relating crop yield to weed and crop density and a statistical comparison with other models. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 105: 513–521.
    DiTomaso JM (1995) Approaches for improving crop competitiveness through the manipulation of fertilization strategies. Weed Science 43: 491–497.
    Fischer RA and Miles RE (1973) The role of spatial pattern in the competition between crop plants and weeds: a theoretical analysis. Mathematical Biosciences 18: 335–350.
    book Glauninger J and Holzner W (1982) "Interference between weeds and crops: a review of literature". In: Holzner W and Numata M (eds) Biology and Ecology of Weeds, pp. 149–159. The Hague, Boston, London: Dr W. Junk Publishers.
    book Grime JP (1979) Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. New York: Wiley.
    book Harper JL (1977) Population Biology of Plants. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 892pp.
    van Heemst HDJ (1985) The influence of weed competition on crop yield. Agricultural Systems 18: 81–93.
    Knezevic SZ, Evans SP, Blankenship EE, Van Acker RC and Lindquist JL (2002) Critical period for weed control: the concept and data analysis. Weed Science 50: 773–786.
    Kropff MJ and Spitters CJT (1991) A simple model of crop loss by weed competition from early observations on relative leaf area of the weeds. Weed Research 31: 97–105.
    Lindquist JL (2001) Performance of INTERCOM for predicting corn-velvetleaf interference across north-central United States. Weed Science 49: 195–201.
    Lindquist JL, Mortensen DA, Clay SA et al. (1996) Stability of coefficients in the corn yield loss–velvetleaf density relationship across the North Central U.S. Weed Science 44: 309–313.
    Miller AB and Hopen HJ (1991) Critical weed-control period in seeded cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata). Weed Technology 5: 852–857.
    book Mohler CL (2001) "Enhancing the competitive ability of crops". In: Liebman M, Mohler CL and Staver CP (eds) Ecological Management of Agricultural Weeds, pp. 269–321. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Oerke E-C (2005) Crop losses to pests. Journal of Agricultural Science 144: 31–43.
    book Radosevich SR, Holt JS and Ghersa CM (1997) Weed Ecology, Implications for Management. New York: Wiley, 589pp.
    book Tilman D (1982) Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    other Tull J (1733) Horse-Hoeing Husbandry.
    Vandermeer J (1984) Plant competition and the yield-density relationship. Journal of Theoretical Biology 109: 393–399.
    Watkinson AR (1980) Density-dependence in single-species populations of plants. Journal of Theoretical Biology 83: 345–357.
    Weiner J (1990) Asymmetric competition in plant populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 5: 360–364.
    Weiner J, Gripentrog H-W and Kristensen L (2001) Suppression of weeds by spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) increases with crop density and spatial uniformity. Journal of Applied Ecology 38: 784–790.
    Willey RW and Heath SB (1969) The quantitative relationships between plant population and crop yield. Advances in Agronomy 21: 281–321.
 Further Reading
    book DeWit CT (1960) On Competition. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Institute for Biological and Chemical Research on Field Crops and Herbage, 82pp.
    book Firbank LG and Watkinson AR (1990) "On the effects of competition: from monocultures to mixtures". In: Grace JB and Tilman D (eds) Perspectives on Plant Competition, pp. 165–187. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    book Kropff MJ and van Laar HH (1993) Modelling Crop–Weed Interactions. Wallingford: CAB International, 304pp.
    book Liebman M, Mohler CL and Staver CP (2001) Ecological Management of Agricultural Weeds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 532pp.
    book Radosevich SR, Holt JS and Ghersa CM (1997) Weed Ecology, Implications for Management, 2nd edn. New York: Wiley, 589pp.
    book Tilman D (1990) "Mechanisms of plant competition for nutrients: the elements of a predictive theory of competition". In: Grace JB and Tilman D (eds) Perspectives on Plant Competition, pp. 117–141. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    book Zimdahl RL (1980) Weed–Crop Competition, A Review. IPPC #31-A-80 ed. Corvallis, OR: International Plant Protection Center. 196pp.
    book Zimdahl RL (2004) Weed–Crop Competition: A Review, 2nd edn. Ames, IA: Blackwell Publishing. 232pp.
Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Gallandt, Eric R, and Weiner, Jacob(Dec 2007) Crop–Weed Competition. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0020477]