Informed Consent in Operation

Abstract

Informed consent is understood as a crucial aspect in the ethical practice of research involving the use of human subjects. However, evidence based on the experiences and understanding of research participants shows that they generally do not fully comprehend the study information they have been given. Some experience the consent process as abandonment or as a request to comply with the doctor's wishes, while others actively seek out participation or take charge of research to further their own health and welfare interests. While problems surrounding the limits of consent have been addressed by focusing on ways to improve the consent process, misunderstandings are often not due to a lack of information provided or the inability of subjects to comprehend the information, but rather the preexisting beliefs, norms and expectations about the clinical encounter and the trust, hope and faith in medicine of those taking part, influence their understanding.

Keywords: informed consent; risks; benefits; norms; expectations; hope

References

Appelbaum P, Roth L, Lidz C, Benson P and Winslade W (1987) False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Center Report 2: 20–24.

Bamberg M and Budwig N (1992) Therapeutic misconceptions: when the voices of caring and research are misconstrued as the voice of curing. Ethics and Behaviour 2: 165–184.

Bergler J, Pennington A, Metcalf M and Freis E (1980) Informed consent: how much does the patient understand? Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 27: 435–440.

Bevan EG, Chee LC, McGhee SM and McInnes GT (1993) Patients attitudes to participation in clinical trials. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 35: 204–207.

Bigorra J and Baños J (1990) Weight of financial reward in the decision by medical students and experienced healthy volunteers to participate in clinical trials. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 38: 443–446.

Burton B (2002) Proposed genetic database on Tongans opposed. BMJ 324: 443.

Cassileth B, Zupkiss R, Sutton‐Smith K and March V (1980) Informed consent – why are its goals imperfectly realized? New England Journal of Medicine 302: 896–900.

Corrigan OP (2003) Empty ethics: the problem with informed consent. Sociology of Health and Illness 25: 768–792.

Corrigan OP (2005) Morality, risk and informed consent in clinical drug trials. In: Redclift N (ed.) Contesting Moralities: Science, Identity, Conflict. London: UCL Press.

Council for International Organizations of the Medical Sciences and the World Health Organization (CIOMS/WHO) (1993) International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva: CIOMS.

Dixon‐Woods M, Ashcroft RE, Jackson CJ et al. (2007) Beyond “misunderstanding”: written information and decisions about taking part in a genetic epidemiology study. Social Science & Medicine 65: 2212–2222.

Donovan J, Mills N, Smith M et al. (2002) Quality improvement report: improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study * Commentary: presenting unbiased information to patients can be difficult. BMJ 325: 766–770.

Dresser R (2001) When Science Offers Salvation: Patient Advocacy and Research Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunn L and Jeste D (2003) Problem areas in the understanding of informed consent for research: study of middle‐aged and older patients with psychotic disorders. Psychopharmacology 171: 81–85.

Edwards SJL, Lilford RJ and Hewison J (1998) The ethics of randomised controlled trials from the perspectives of patients, the public, and healthcare professionals. BMJ 317: 1209–1212.

Epstein S (1996) Impure Science. London: University of California Press.

Estey A, Wilkin G and Dossetor J (1994) Are research subjects able to retain the information they are given during the consent process? Health Law Review 3: 37–41.

Featherstone K and Donovan J (1998) Random allocation or allocation at random? Patients’ perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 317: 1177–1180.

Freedman B (1987) Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. New England Journal of Medicine 317: 141–145.

Glass KC and Kaufert J (2007) Research ethics review and aboriginal community values: can the two be reconciled? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 2: 25–40.

Haimes E and Wong‐Barr M (2004) Levels and styles of participation in genetic databases: a case study of the North Cumbria Community Genetics Project. In: Tutton R and Corrigan OP (eds) Genetic Databases: Socio‐ethical Issues in the Collection and Use of DNA. London: Routledge.

Hassar M and Weintraub M (1976) Uniformed consent and the wealthy volunteer: an analysis of patient volunteers in a clinical trial of a new anti‐inflammatory drug. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 29: 379–386.

Hayden C (2007) Taking as giving: bioscience, exchange and the politics of benefit sharing. Social Studies of Science 37: 729–758.

Hoeyer K (2003) Science is really needed – thats all I know: informed consent and the non‐verbal practices of collecting blood for genetic research in northern Sweden. New Genetics and Society 22: 229–244.

Meropol NJ, Weinfurt KP, Burnett CB et al. (2003) Perceptions of patients and physicians regarding phase I cancer clinical trials: implications for physician‐patient communication. Journal of Clinical Oncology 21: 2589–2596.

Miller PB and Weijer C (2006) Trust based obligations of the state and physician‐researchers to patient‐subjects. Journal of Medical Ethics 32: 542–547.

Moodley K, Pather M and Myer L (2005) Informed consent and participant perceptions of influenza vaccine trials in South Africa. Journal of Medical Ethics 31: 727–732.

News Feature (2006) Will volunteers still want to take part in research after the TGN1412 trial? The Pharmaceutical Journal 277: 387–388.

Novas C (2006) The political economy of hope: patients organizations, science and biovalue. Bioethics 1: 289–345.

O'Neill O (2002) Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rabeharisoa V and Callon M (1998) The participation of patients in the process of production of knowledge: the case of the French Muscular Dystrophies Association. Sciences Sociales et Santé 16: 41–65.

Reardon J (2001) The Human Genome Diversity Project: a case study in coproduction. Social Studies of Science 31: 357–388.

Ross S, Grant A, Counsell C et al. (1999) Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials – literature summary and annotated bibliography. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 52: 1143–1156.

Schutta KM and Burnett CB (2000) Factors that influence a patient's decision to participate in a phase I cancer clinical trial. Oncology Nursing Forum 27: 1435–1438.

Snowdon C, Garcia J and Elbourne D (1997) Making sense of randomization; responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial. Social Science & Medicine 45: 1337–1355.

Sugarman J, McCrory DC, Powell D et al. (1999) Empirical research on informed consent: an annotated bibliography. A Hastings Center Report (Special suppl.) 29(1): S1–S42.

Taylor KM (1992) Integrating conflicting professional roles: physician participation in randomized clinical trials. Social Science & Medicine 35: 217–224.

Weijer C, Shapiro SH, Glass KC and Enkin MW (2000) For and against: clinical equipoise and not the uncertainty principle is the moral underpinning of the randomised controlled trial FOR AGAINST. BMJ 321: 756–758.

Weinstein M (2001) A public culture for guinea pigs: US human research subjects after the Tuskegee study. Science as Culture 10: 195–223.

Williams E, Goodenough T, Kent J and Ashcroft R (2004) Children's participation in genetics epidemiology: consent and control. In: Genetic Databases: Socio‐ethical Issues in the Collection and Use of DNA. London: Routledge.

World Medical Association (WMA) (2004) World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Ferney‐le‐Voltaire, France: World Medical Association.

Further Reading

Beauchamp TL and Childress JF (1989) Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Beecher H (1970) Research and the Individual Human Studies. Boston: Little Brown.

Corrigan OP, McMillan J, Liddell K, Richards M and Weijer C (2008) The Limits of Consent: A Socio‐ethical Approach to Human Subject Research in Medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Doyal L and Tobias J (2001) Informed Consent in Medical Research. London: BMJ Books.

Fox R (1996) Experiment perilous: forty‐five years as a participant observer of patient oriented clinical research. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 39: 202–226.

Gray BH (1975) Human Subjects in Medical Experimentation. New York: Wiley.

Knoppers BM and Chadwick R (2006) Human genetic research: emerging trends in ethics. Focus 4: 416–422.

Pappworth M (1967) Human Guinea Pigs. Middlesex, England: Pelican.

Vanderpool HY (1996) The Ethics of Research Involving Human Subjects. Frederick, MD: University Publishing Group.

Weijer C (2000) The ethical analysis of risk. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 28: 344–361.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Corrigan, Oonagh(Dec 2008) Informed Consent in Operation. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0020655]