Alternative Polyadenylation in the Human Genome: Evolution

Abstract

Messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) polyadenylation is an essential step for the maturation of most eukaryotic mRNAs, and is tightly coupled with termination of transcription. Over half of all human genes have alternative polyadenylation sites, resulting in transcript variants with different 3′ UTR (untranslated region) sequences and, in some cases, protein‐coding regions. Comparative genomic studies are beginning to elucidate the phylogenetics of cis‐elements and protein factors involved in the regulation of mRNA polyadenylation, and shed light on the evolution of alternative polyadenylation.

Keywords: mRNA polyadenylation; evolution; cis‐elements; splicing; 3′ UTR

Figure 1.

Cis‐elements in mRNA polyadenylation. A poly(A) site region is shown, with a poly(A) site (pA) in the middle. Cis‐elements that have been phylogenetically analysed are listed in a table containing different species and evolutionary groups. ‘+’ and ‘−’ indicate presence or absence of polyadenylation of cis‐elements in a species. ‘?’ indicates that the cis‐element has not been biochemically examined.

Figure 2.

Types of alternative polyadenylation. Alternative polyadenylation in the 3′‐most exon result in alternative 3′ UTRs. Alternative polyadenylation in introns can result in two forms of alternative terminal exons, i.e. composite terminal exon and skipped terminal exon. ORF, open reading frame.

Figure 3.

Alternative polyadenylation in 3′‐most exons. (a) Usage of human alternative polyadenylation sites. (b) Human 3′ UTR lengths resulting from alternative polyadenylation. Median 3′ UTR lengths are shown above the graph. The 5′‐ and 3′‐most poly(A) sites are those located 5′‐ and 3′‐most sites in 3′‐most exons. The middle poly(A) sites are located between 5′‐ and 3′‐most poly(A) sites. Poly(A) sites conserved in mouse are shown as ‘C’ and nonconserved one as ‘N’.

Figure 4.

Transposable elements (TEs) and alternative poly(A) sites. Poly(A) sites conserved in mouse are shown as ‘C’ and nonconserved one as ‘N’.

Figure 5.

Interplay between splicing and polyadenylation. ‘+’ indicates activation and ‘−’ indicates inhibition. pA, poly(A) site; the ‘A’ between 5′ss and 3′ss represents the branch point of intron.

close

References

Ara T, Lopez F, Ritchie W, Benech P and Gautheret D (2006) Conservation of alternative polyadenylation patterns in mammalian genes. BMC Genomics 7: 189.

Barbosa‐Morais NL, Carmo‐Fonseca M and Aparicio S (2006) Systematic genome‐wide annotation of spliceosomal proteins reveals differential gene family expansion. Genome Research 16: 66–77.

Beaudoing E, Freier S, Wyatt JR, Claverie JM and Gautheret D (2000) Patterns of variant polyadenylation signal usage in human genes. Genome Research 10: 1001–1010.

Chen JM, Ferec C and Cooper DN (2006) A systematic analysis of disease‐associated variants in the 3′ regulatory regions of human protein‐coding genes I: general principles and overview. Human Genetics 120: 1–21.

Cheng J, Kapranov P, Drenkow J et al. (2005) Transcriptional maps of 10 human chromosomes at 5‐nucleotide resolution. Science 308: 1149–1154.

Colgan DF and Manley JL (1997) Mechanism and regulation of mRNA polyadenylation. Genes & Development 11: 2755–2766.

Edwalds‐Gilbert G, Veraldi KL and Milcarek C (1997) Alternative poly(A) site selection in complex transcription units: means to an end? Nucleic Acids Research 25: 2547–2561.

Houseley J, LaCava J and Tollervey D (2006) RNA‐quality control by the exosome. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 7: 529–539.

Hu J, Lutz CS, Wilusz J and Tian B (2005) Bioinformatic identification of candidate cis‐regulatory elements involved in human mRNA polyadenylation. RNA 11: 1485–1493.

Lee JY, Yeh I, Park JY and Tian B (2007) PolyA_DB 2: mRNA polyadenylation sites in vertebrate genes. Nucleic Acids Research 35: D165–D168.

Paule MR and White RJ (2000) SURVEY AND SUMMARY Transcription by RNA polymerases I and III. Nucl Acids Research 28: 1283–1298.

Proudfoot NJ, Furger A and Dye MJ (2002) Integrating mRNA processing with transcription. Cell 108: 501–512.

Richter JD (1999) Cytoplasmic polyadenylation in development and beyond. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 63: 446–456.

Rosonina E, Kaneko S and Manley JL (2006) Terminating the transcript: breaking up is hard to do. Genes & Development 20: 1050–1056.

Salisbury J, Hutchison KW and Graber JH (2006) A multispecies comparison of the metazoan 3′‐processing downstream elements and the CstF‐64 RNA recognition motif. BMC Genomics 7: 55.

Tian B, Hu J, Zhang H and Lutz CS (2005) A large‐scale analysis of mRNA polyadenylation of human and mouse genes. Nucleic Acids Research 33: 201–212.

Weiner AM (2005) E Pluribus Unum: 3′ end formation of polyadenylated mRNAs, histone mRNAs, and U snRNAs. Molecular Cell 20: 168–170.

Wickens M, Anderson P and Jackson RJ (1997) Life and death in the cytoplasm: messages from the 3′ end. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 7: 220–232.

Yan J and Marr TG (2005) Computational analysis of 3′‐ends of ESTs shows four classes of alternative polyadenylation in human, mouse, and rat. Genome Research 15: 369–375.

Zhang H, Lee JY and Tian B (2005) Biased alternative polyadenylation in human tissues. Genome Biology 6: R100.

Zhang XH and Chasin LA (2006) Comparison of multiple vertebrate genomes reveals the birth and evolution of human exons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 103: 13427–13432.

Zhao J, Hyman L and Moore C (1999) Formation of mRNA 3′ ends in eukaryotes: mechanism, regulation, and interrelationships with other steps in mRNA synthesis. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 63: 405–445.

Further Reading

Bucheli ME, He X, Kaplan CD, Moore CL and Buratowski S (2007) Polyadenylation site choice in yeast is affected by competition between Npl3 and polyadenylation factor CFI. RNA 13: 1756–1764.

Danckwardt S, Kaufmann I, Gentzel M et al. (2007) Splicing factors stimulate polyadenylation via USEs at non‐canonical 3′ end formation signals. EMBO Journal 26: 2658–2669.

Graham RR, Kyogoku C, Sigurdsson S et al. (2007) Three functional variants of IFN regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) define risk and protective haplotypes for human lupus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 104: 6758–6763.

Hall‐Pogar T, Liang S, Hague LK and Lutz CS (2007) Specific trans‐acting proteins interact with auxiliary RNA polyadenylation elements in the COX‐2 3′‐UTR. RNA 13: 1103–1115.

Kaneko S and Manley JL (2005) The mammalian RNA polymerase II C‐terminal domain interacts with RNA to suppress transcription‐coupled 3′ end formation. Molecular Cell 20: 91–103.

Kim Guisbert KS, Li H and Guthrie C (2007) Alternative 3′ pre‐mRNA processing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is modulated by Nab4/Hrp1 in vivo. PLoS Biology 5: e6.

Kubo T, Wada T, Yamaguchi Y, Shimizu A and Handa H (2006) Knock‐down of 25 kDa subunit of cleavage factor Im in Hela cells alters alternative polyadenylation within 3′‐UTRs. Nucleic Acids Research 34: 6264–6271.

Kyburz A, Friedlein A, Langen H and Keller W (2006) Direct interactions between subunits of CPSF and the U2 snRNP contribute to the coupling of pre‐mRNA 3′ end processing and splicing. Molecular Cell 23: 195–205.

Millevoi S, Loulergue C, Dettwiler S et al. (2006) An interaction between U2AF 65 and CF I(m) links the splicing and 3′ end processing machineries. EMBO Journal 25: 4854–4864.

Peterson ML, Bingham GL and Cowan C (2006) Multiple features contribute to the use of the immunoglobulin M secretion‐specific poly(A) signal but are not required for developmental regulation. Molecular and Cellular Biology 26: 6762–6771.

Sheets MD, Ogg SC and Wickens MP (1990) Point mutations in AAUAAA and the poly (A) addition site: effects on the accuracy and efficiency of cleavage and polyadenylation in vitro. Nucleic Acids Research 18: 5799–5805.

Venkataraman K, Brown KM and Gilmartin GM (2005) Analysis of a noncanonical poly(A) site reveals a tripartite mechanism for vertebrate poly(A) site recognition. Genes & Development 19: 1315–1327.

Zhu H, Zhou HL, Hasman RA and Lou H (2007) Hu proteins regulate polyadenylation by blocking sites containing U‐rich sequences. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 282: 2203–2210.

Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Tian, Bin(Jul 2008) Alternative Polyadenylation in the Human Genome: Evolution. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0020768]