Evolution of Microsatellite DNA

Microsatellites are highly mutable tandemly repeated sequences that are ubiquitously distributed in bacterial and eukaryotic genomes. Microsatellites became the preferred molecular marker for a variety of applications under the basic assumption that they are selectively neutral. However, the simplicity of this assumption contrasts with the observed variability of mutation rates across microsatellite loci and with the increasing evidence supporting microsatellite functionality. The evolutionary importance of microsatellites is only recently being uncovered with the intense study of their impact on the regulation of gene expression and the interaction among genomic structures.

Keywords: tandem repeats; strand slippage; repetitive

Figure 1. Factors and processes affecting microsatellite mutation. Factors (italics) operate at different hierarchical levels (orange boxes), starting from the smallest scale the microsatellite locus itself and moving up to the species level. Selection operates across all levels. All these factors interact dynamically, affecting the rate of replication slippage and recombination and, therefore, microsatellite variability.
Figure 2. Models of tandem repeat length mutation. Unequal crossover, involving misalignment of homologous chromosomes or sister chromatids (Part A) and strand slippage (Part B) are the two main types of mechanism that have been proposed. Strand slippage can occur during any process requiring DNA synthesis, including recombination (Part C).
Figure 3. Functional implications of microsatellite length change. Microsatellite length variations have been shown to mediate diverse functions depending on the genomic region in which these are present. Within exons microsatellite mutations can induce changes in protein structure, therefore altering its function, or can directly inactivate the protein by trunctation or fusion of open reading frames (ORFs). Within introns and intergenic regions these changes can partake in the modulation of gene expression, either by modifying the structure of transcription factors or enzymes involved in transcription modulation, or by changing the secondary and/or tertiary structure of DNA or RNA regions that interact with transcription factors. Furthermore, microsatellites are involved in the regulation of their own and genome-wide mutation rates, by being present within the minor components of the mismatch repair system.
close
 References
    Fondon III JW and Garner HR (2004) Molecular origins of rapid and continuous morphological evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 101: 18058–18063.
    Hammock EA and Young LJ (2005) Microsatellite instability generates diversity in brain and sociobehavioral traits. Science 308: 1630–1634.
    Levinson G and Gutman GA (1987) Slipped-strand mispairing: a major mechanism for DNA sequence evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4: 203–221.
    Morgante M, Hanafey M and Powell W (2002) Microsatellites are preferentially associated with nonrepetitive DNA in plant genomes. Nature Genetics 30: 194–200.
    Moxon ER, Rainey PB, Nowak MA and Lenski RE (1994) Adaptive evolution of highly mutable loci in pathogenic bacteria. Current Biology 4: 24–33.
    Rockman MV and Wray GA (2002) Abundant raw material for cis-regulatory evolution in humans. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19: 1991–2004.
    Smith GP (1976) Evolution of repeated DNA sequences by unequal crossover. Science 191: 528–535.
    Sreenu VB, Kumar P, Nagaraju J and Nagarajaram HA (2006) Microsatellite polymorphism across the M. tuberculosis and M. bovis genomes: implications on genome evolution and plasticity. BMC Genomics 7: 78.
    Taft RJ, Pheasant M and Mattick JS (2007) The relationship between non-protein-coding DNA and eukaryotic complexity. BioEssays 29: 288–299.
    Verstrepen KJ, Jansen A, Lewitter F and Fink GR (2005) Intragenic tandem repeats generate functional variability. Nature Genetics 37: 986–990.
 Further Reading
    Buschiazzo E and Gemmell NJ (2006) The rise, fall and renaissance of microsatellites in eukaryotic genomes. BioEssays 28: 1040–1050.
    book Caporale LH (2006) The implicit genome. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Kashi Y and King DG (2006) Simple sequence repeats as advantageous mutators in evolution. Trends in Genetics 22: 253–259.
    Nikitina TV and Nazarenko SA (2004) Human microsatellites: mutation and evolution. Russian Journal of Genetics 40: 1065–1079.
Contact Editor close
Submit a note to the editor about this article by filling in the form below.

* Required Field

How to Cite close
Vargas Jentzsch, Iris M, Bagshaw, Andrew, Buschiazzo, Emmanuel, Merkel, Angelika, and Gemmell, Neil J(May 2008) Evolution of Microsatellite DNA. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester. http://www.els.net [doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0020847]